Ms. Smith Goes to Washington
March 1, 2006
Supreme Court Promoting Violence
MS. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON
by Shirley Smith
What would our illustrious Supreme Court say if those in one of these clinics, such as in Florida, happened to think they were being "threatened," and fought back in a deadly manner? How can any Supreme Court of the US come out and say that any kind of violence is okay? To me, they just made themselves complicit with any murder committed by these, not-at-all-religious people, but by extremists and hate mongers, who use their religion to hide behind, and as a reason to exploit their dark sides. They are no different from any other criminal who breaks the law and uses violence to do so.
But, what can we expect from a Supreme Court that is stacked by a Bush GOP government who is responsible for tens of thousands of deaths, highest US debt ever, and the complete breakdown and destruction using violence against another country? Lied and still haven't been tried. We Americans get what we pay for, don't we, and we are still paying for this criminal violence.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court sided with anti-abortion groups in a 20-year-old lawsuit by ruling on Tuesday that federal law did not cover the physical violence by protesters cited in the shutdown of health clinics.
I've always said this Supreme Court should be impeached right along with those criminals that they placed into the White House. And, I'm still for it. They do not represent democracy or the right to individual freedom without the fear of being violated or killed by religious hate-filled fanatics, who are supported by the Bush GOP government. With these such rulings, who in the hell needs a so-called Supreme Court. Supreme indeed. A person doesn't have to have a law degree today, to know right from wrong.
Thanks BuzzFlash,
Shirley Smith
Shirley Smith is a regular BuzzFlash Reader and Contributor. Many of her earlier posts can be found in the Mailbag.