|
World Media Watch
by Gloria R. Lalumia
BuzzFlash Note: WMW provides BuzzFlash readers
foreign views and perspectives that are not usually available from the
media here in the U.S. The presentation of these articles from these international
publications is not an endorsement of their viewpoints.
* * *
WORLD MEDIA WATCH FOR MAY 13, 2005
1//Asia Times Online, Hong Kong--IN IRAQ’S INSURGENCY, NO RULES, JUST
DEATH
(… To fight the enemy, America cannot have any strategy other than its
willingness to fulfill the desire of the insurgents. One has to paraphrase
18th century US statesman Patrick Henry's famous statement: "Give
me liberty or give me death." In this instance, the Iraqi insurgents
are not interested in living under what the Americans call a system based
on liberty. They have chosen death as a price of destroying that system.
In the process of dying, they are also willing to take a whole lot of
Iraqis and Americans with them. This is not a reality that America wanted
to create in Iraq. Still, the Bush administration is poised to stabilize
Iraq through increased reliance on the indigenous security forces, while
keeping a high operational tempo that is aimed at catching the insurgents
off guard and capturing or killing their top leaders. It is hoped that
the capture or eradication of the top leadership of the insurgency will
eventually lead to the defeat of that movement. The American thinking
is sound; however, the tactics used might produce contrary results. …)
2//The Middle East Times, Cyprus--WORST ANTI-US PROTESTS SPREAD ACROSS
AFGHANISTAN (The biggest anti-US protests since the fall of the Taliban
spread across Afghanistan on May 12, as unrest sparked by alleged abuse
of the Koran at the US jail in Guantanamo Bay left three more people dead.
Seven people have been killed and at least 76 injured during three days
of violent demonstrations, all of them in clashes with security forces
and police in conservative towns east of the capital Kabul. Angry Afghans
shouting "Death to America" poured onto the streets of Kabul
itself for the first time on Thursday and protests at the reported religious
slur have now broken out in 10 of Afghanistan's 34 provinces. The Koran
controversy has also spread to Pakistan, where demonstrations were held
in Peshwar and Quetta, two major cities close to the border with Afghanistan.
… Thousands of people also took to the streets in the northern provinces
of Parwan, Kapisa and Takhar, Laghman in the east, Logar and Khost in
the southeast and the southern province of Kandahar. The United Nations
and foreign aid agencies evacuated hundreds of workers from Jalalabad
fearing further violence.)
3//The Khaleej Times, United Arab Emirates--RUSSIA TO SEND FIRST FUEL
TO IRANIAN NUKE PLANT AT YEAR’S END: OFFICIAL (Russia plans to make its
first delivery of nuclear fuel to Iran at the end of the year or early
next year under a landmark agreement to fire up the country’s first atomic
power station, a senior Russian nuclear official said on Thursday. “They
have to start to fire it up mid-2006. The fuel has to be at the plant
six months before that,” Alexander Rumyantsev, the head of the Russian
atomic agency said in an interview due for publication in daily Vremia
Novosti, quoted by the Ria Novosti news agency. Under the accord between
Russia and Iran signed in February, Russia is to send nearly 100 tonnes
of fuel in several consignments under the supervision of the International
Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA].)
4//RIA Novosti, Russia--FSB BELIEVES FOREIGN NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIOINS
PREPARE NEW “VELVET REVOLUTIONS” (The Russian Federal Security Service
(FSB) has information on preparation of new velvet revolutions on the
post-Soviet space by a number of foreign non-governmental organizations.
… According to him, the Russian special services know that a western non-governmental
organization allocated about $5 million to finance a velvet revolution
in Belarus. … Among these non-governmental organizations are the US Peace
Corps, the Red Crescent from Saudi Arabia, some Kuwaiti organizations
and others, he said.)
5//Deutsche-Welle/DW-World.de, Germany--GERMANY APPROVES EU CONSTITUTION
(German parliamentarians overwhelmingly approved the EU constitution on
Thursday. While the treaty has been at the center of impassioned public
debate in France, it has failed to ignite similar interest in Germany.
With 569 yes votes, 23 no votes and two abstentions, the German Bundestag
approved the new European Union Constitution. The result masks growing
public unease at the EU's direction. But reservations about the constitution
have failed to gain momentum, partially due to widespread ignorance of
its finer points. The anti-globalization activist group Attac has now
launched a campaign entitled "Europe: No to the EU Constitution Treaty;
Yes to a social, democratic and peaceful Europe," which it hopes
will boost public awareness of an issue that has so far gone largely ignored.
… Berlin's vote comes one day after Austria's lower house of parliament
voted overwhelmingly for the charter -- with its upper house expected
to approve the treaty right before France holds its hotly-contested referendum
on May 29. Slovakia also approved the constitution Wednesday, bringing
the number of states to have approved the treaty up to seven. In order
for the constitution to take effect, it must be ratified by all 25 member
states.)
* * *
1//Asia Times Online, Hong Kong May 13, 2005
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/GE13Ak01.html
IN IRAQ’S INSURGENCY, NO RULES, JUST DEATH
By Ehsan Ahrari
In the very initial phase of evolution, Iraq's insurgents decided that
Iraq would not be governed by the American-appointed government. After
the elections of January 30, they also determined that a government elected
under the American-written constitution would not govern it. But how are
they are going to impose their will? Their decision all along seems to
be that one side has to be either eradicated or defeated.
The American side cannot be eradicated, but the insurgents seem to have
decided that they will not be defeated, as long as they are willing to
die for their cause. One US Marine recently described the battle with
insurgents in Ubaidi, 15 miles east of the Syrian border, by observing,
"They came here to die. They were willing to stay in place and die
with no hope. All they wanted was to take us with them." How do you
develop an effective strategy to fight those who follow no rules, except
their willingness to die for their cause? No one on the American side
seems to have an answer.
The insurgents in Iraq comprise a variety of groups. First and foremost
are the Ba'athists and pan-Arabists, including persons of civilian bureaucracy
and armed forces under Saddam Hussein. They had careers and retirement
plans. They had guaranteed sources of income to support their families.
Even in the uncertain political environment of Iraq under a dictator,
they did not harbor grave doubts about having a secure means of earning
a living, as long as they did not antagonize the wicked regime. Today,
almost 90% of them have no job, no income and no future. Thus, they form
a majority of the Iraqi insurgency. A large number of army personnel are
reportedly well trained in urban warfare. They are eager to destroy the
current evolving system, which, from their point of view, is highly illegitimate
because it is created by the United States.
Then there are the Sunni Islamists who wish to see their country ruled
under the banner of Sunni Islam. There is also the Iraqi branch of al-Qaeda,
whose goals of having an Islamist Iraq may not be too much different than
that of the Sunni Islamists, like Ansar al-Islam, and its offshoot, Ansar
al-Sunnah. They are driven by the jihadi frame of mind. The "super-Infidel"
is occupying the land of Islam, according to this perspective, and should
be driven out, no matter the cost. In this frame of reference, there is
no compromise, just death, either for them, or for their enemy, or for
both. Consequently, Iraq has gone beyond a point where it could be described
as "hell."
To fight the enemy, America cannot have any strategy other than its willingness
to fulfill the desire of the insurgents. One has to paraphrase 18th century
US statesman Patrick Henry's famous statement: "Give me liberty or
give me death." In this instance, the Iraqi insurgents are not interested
in living under what the Americans call a system based on liberty. They
have chosen death as a price of destroying that system. In the process
of dying, they are also willing to take a whole lot of Iraqis and Americans
with them. This is not a reality that America wanted to create in Iraq.
Still, the Bush administration is poised to stabilize Iraq through increased
reliance on the indigenous security forces, while keeping a high operational
tempo that is aimed at catching the insurgents off guard and capturing
or killing their top leaders. It is hoped that the capture or eradication
of the top leadership of the insurgency will eventually lead to the defeat
of that movement. The American thinking is sound; however, the tactics
used might produce contrary results.
(MORE)
2//The Middle East Times, Cyprus May 12, 2005
http://www.metimes.com/articles/normal...
WORST ANTI-US PROTESTS SPREAD ACROSS AFGHANISTAN
Sardar Ahmad
KABUL -- The biggest anti-US protests since the fall of
the Taliban spread across Afghanistan on May 12, as unrest sparked by
alleged abuse of the Koran at the US jail in Guantanamo Bay left three
more people dead.
Seven people have been killed and at least 76 injured during three days
of violent demonstrations, all of them in clashes with security forces
and police in conservative towns east of the capital Kabul.
Angry Afghans shouting "Death to America" poured onto the streets
of Kabul itself for the first time on Thursday and protests at the reported
religious slur have now broken out in 10 of Afghanistan's 34 provinces.
The Koran controversy has also spread to Pakistan, where demonstrations
were held in Peshwar and Quetta, two major cities close to the border
with Afghanistan.
Two protesters were killed on Thursday when gunfire broke out as police
stopped them marching into the eastern Afghan city of Jalalabad from a
district just to the northwest, a provincial official said.
Jalalabad was the scene of a major riot on Wednesday in which four people
died when police opened fire to control a mob that torched the buildings
of several aid agencies, the Pakistani consulate and the governor's house.
(SNIP)
The protests were sparked by a small report in Newsweek magazine last
week that interrogators at the US military detention center in Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba, desecrated copies of the Koran by leaving them in toilet cubicles
and even stuffing one down a lavatory to rattle Muslim prisoners.
More than 500 detainees, most captured in Afghanistan or Pakistan following
the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, are held as "enemy
combatants" at Guantanamo.
The US, which leads a coalition of some 18,000 troops hunting Taliban
militants three years after the regime was toppled, has promised to look
into the claims. The US military has not been involved in policing the
protests.
But in Kabul, student demonstrators shouted slogans calling on US President
George W. Bush to apologise to Islamic countries and set a US flag ablaze.
The protest ended peacefully.
Thousands of people also took to the streets in the northern provinces
of Parwan, Kapisa and Takhar, Laghman in the east, Logar and Khost in
the southeast and the southern province of Kandahar.
The United Nations and foreign aid agencies evacuated hundreds of workers
from Jalalabad fearing further violence.
Afghan officials have suggested that elements opposed to the US-backed
effort to rebuild the war-ravaged country have coordinated the violence,
and protests come amid a recent deterioration in security.
(SNIP)
Veteran Afghan analyst Rahimullah Yusufzai said the protests gave the
public a chance to vent their anger at President Hamid Karzai's government
and the United States itself, but were unlikely to be coordinated.
"This is the biggest protest campaign in Afghanistan since the ouster
of Taliban regime. This is bloody, widespread and countrywide," the
Pakistan-based analyst said.
"This also shows that they are fed up with the United States and
they just needed a spark to vent their feelings," he said.
(MORE)
3//The Khaleej Times, United Arab Emirates 12 May 2005
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle.asp?xfile...
RUSSIA TO SEND FIRST FUEL TO IRANIAN NUKE PLANT AT YEAR’S END: OFFICIAL
MOSCOW (AFP) - Russia plans to make its first delivery of nuclear fuel
to Iran at the end of the year or early next year under a landmark agreement
to fire up the country’s first atomic power station, a senior Russian
nuclear official said on Thursday.
“They have to start to fire it up mid-2006. The fuel has to be at the
plant six months before that,” Alexander Rumyantsev, the head of the Russian
atomic agency said in an interview due for publication in daily Vremia
Novosti, quoted by the Ria Novosti news agency.
Under the accord between Russia and Iran signed in February,
Russia is to send nearly 100 tonnes of fuel in several consignments under
the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
“All the necessary precautions have been made in line with
international standards,” Rumyantsev said.
The United States alleges that the Bushehr nuclear power
plant in southern Iran is part of a cover for weapons development.
(SNIP)
As a concession to Western concerns, Russia will fuel the
reactor on condition that Iran sends back spent fuel, which could potentially
be upgraded to weapons use.
Tehran initially rejected the condition, but eventually
relented after two years of negotiations.
4//RIA Novosti, Russia 13/05/2005
http://en.rian.ru/world/20050512/39973262.html
FSB BELIEVES FOREIGN NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIOINS PREPARE NEW “VELVET
REVOLUTIONS”
MOSCOW, May 12 20:06 (RIA Novosti) - The Russian Federal Security Service
(FSB) has information on preparation of new velvet revolutions on the
post-Soviet space by a number of foreign non-governmental organizations.
"Foreign special services are proactively using non-traditional methods.
They promote their interests using educational programs of various non-governmental
organizations and collect information, particularly, on the post-Soviet
space," FSB director Nikolai Patrushev told the Russian State Duma
deputies.
According to him, the Russian special services know that a western non-governmental
organization allocated about $5 million to finance a velvet revolution
in Belarus.
"Moreover, oppositionists who made the orange revolution in Ukraine
can be involved in the training of Belarussian oppositionists," Patrushev
added.
Among these non-governmental organizations are the US Peace Corps, the
Red Crescent from Saudi Arabia, some Kuwaiti organizations and others,
he said.
(MORE)
5//Deutsche-Welle/DW-World.de, Germany 12.05.2005
http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,1564,1581297,00.html
GERMANY APPROVES EU CONSTITUTION
German parliamentarians overwhelmingly approved the EU constitution on
Thursday. While the treaty has been at the center of impassioned public
debate in France, it has failed to ignite similar interest in Germany.
With 569 yes votes, 23 no votes and two abstentions, the German Bundestag
approved the new European Union Constitution.
The result masks growing public unease at the EU's direction. But reservations
about the constitution have failed to gain momentum, partially due to
widespread ignorance of its finer points.
The anti-globalization activist group Attac has now launched a campaign
entitled "Europe: No to the EU Constitution Treaty; Yes to a social,
democratic and peaceful Europe," which it hopes will boost public
awareness of an issue that has so far gone largely ignored.
One of its signatories is Jörg Huffschmid, director of the Institute
for European Economics and Social Policy (EWIG) at Bremen University.
"The German ratification process is a stitch-up," he said. "The
politicians are simply going ahead with its implementation."
While other European nations have been mulling over the pros and cons
of the EU Constitution in recent months, Berlin has managed to sweep the
issue under the carpet.
"If we were to hold a general knowledge quiz about the contents of
the European Constitution in France and Germany," pointed out Huffschmid,
"Germany would come out of it pretty badly."
"Not even the media are paying any attention to the matter,"
said Janis. A. Emmanouilidis, EU expert at the Munich Center for Applied
Political Research and an advisor at the Foreign Ministry's European Department.
"The best compromise"
Berlin's vote comes one day after Austria's lower house of parliament
voted overwhelmingly for the charter -- with its upper house expected
to approve the treaty right before France holds its hotly-contested referendum
on May 29.
Slovakia also approved the constitution Wednesday, bringing the number
of states to have approved the treaty up to seven. In order for the constitution
to take effect, it must be ratified by all 25 member states.
(MORE)
|