|
World Media Watch
by Gloria R. Lalumia
BuzzFlash Note: WMW provides BuzzFlash readers
foreign views and perspectives that are not usually available from the
media here in the U.S. The presentation of these articles from these international
publications is not an endorsement of their viewpoints.
* * *
WORLD MEDIA WATCH FOR MARCH 23, 2005
1//The Daily Star, Lebanon--NORWAY READY TO TAKE EXTENSIVE OILFIELD EXPERIENCE
TO IRAQ (Norway, a major oil exporter, is ready to help Iraq's oil industry
by sharing experience, training, and technology, a deputy minister said
Tuesday. "There is real interest in doing this and getting it going
this year," Norwegian Deputy Minister of International Development
Leiv Lunde said. … Lunde said Norwegian aid could include training and
education for Iraqi oil officials, setting up regulations for oil field
operations and accounting. "Openness in accounting for money coming
in and going out from the oil industry is very important," he said,
adding that developing countries often have problems with accounting,
sometimes due to corruption. … Lunde said other countries, the World Bank
and the UN are also likely to become involved in efforts to help rebuild
the Iraqi oil industry.)
2//The Chosun Ilbo, South Korea--ROH HINTS AT NEW EAST ASIAN ORDER (President
Roh Moo-hyun said Tuesday the power structure in East Asia will shift
depending on what choices Korea makes. At a graduation ceremony of the
Korea Third Military Academy on Tuesday, Roh said Korea's new role was
of a stabilizer for peace and prosperity not just on the Korean Peninsula,
but in East Asia as a whole. "Korea will calculate and cooperate
if need be, and move forward with its proper authority and responsibility,"
he said. His comments were being read as a pointed reference to the country's
alliances with the U.S. and Japan rather than a mere statement of principle.
Among core figures in the administration, there is growing dissatisfaction
with U.S. and Japanese policies in East Asia, including North Korea. …
President Roh’s address today can be seen as a warning that Seoul cannot
be counted on if the U.S. and Japan insist on a strategy of pressure on
China and North Korea.)
3//The Telegraph, UK-- EU ARMS EMBARGO AGAINST CHINA SLIDES INTO CHAOS
(The European Union's fragile consensus on lifting its arms embargo on
China was crumbling last night as Tony Blair arrived for a summit in Brussels.
Lifting the ban, an initiative spearheaded by France and Germany, appeared
certain only weeks ago. However, the proposal to end the arms freeze provoked
a furious reaction from America and warnings from the US secretary of
state, Condoleezza Rice, that allies "should do nothing" to
alter the balance of power in Asia. American anger, and apparent British
second thoughts, were stoked still further by China's passing of an "anti-secession
law" last week, authorising military force against Taiwan if it declared
formal independence from Beijing.)
4//The Moscow Times, Russia--THREAT OF A KYRGYZ CIVIL WAR LOOMS (The Kyrgyz
opposition might have hoped to start a velvet revolution by protesting
parliamentary elections, but President Askar Akayev's decision to use
force appears to have brought the country to the verge of civil war. Moscow,
wary of sparking instability in Central Asia, is taking a more cautious
role in Kyrgyzstan than it did in Georgia's Rose Revolution and Ukraine's
Orange Revolution … "The fierce confrontation may threaten the unity
of the country," said Alexei Malashenko, an analyst with the Carnegie
Moscow Center. "It may tear apart the country and set off a war between
the north and south.")
5//Inter Press Service New Agency, Italy--PRIVATE SECTOR STILL EYEING
TO OWN EVERY DROP (Selling water rights to private institutions and then
having people buy them back again is an issue that keeps rearing its ugly
head at every World Water Day, which falls on Mar. 22. Goaded by international
financial institutions and corporate interests, regional governments are
pressing ahead with plans for more private participation in water services.
And yet all across Asia, water privatisation schemes are failing to deliver
clean and safe drinking water to communities, despite forcing consumers
to pay for a basic human right. ''If you look for a water privatisation
arrangement that works ... I cannot think of any,'' Manila-based Mary
Ann Manahan, a researcher with Focus on the Global South, told IPS in
a telephone interview.)
* * *
1//The Daily Star, Lebanon Wednesday, March
23, 2005
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id...
NORWAY READY TO TAKE EXTENSIVE OILFIELD EXPERIENCE TO IRAQ
By Agence France Presse (AFP)
OSLO: Norway, a major oil exporter, is ready to help Iraq's oil industry
by sharing experience, training, and technology, a deputy minister said
Tuesday. "There is real interest in doing this and getting it going
this year," Norwegian Deputy Minister of International Development
Leiv Lunde said.
Norway is the world's third-largest oil exporter with a capacity of 3.2
million barrels plus natural gas from offshore fields.
Iraq is also a potentially major oil supplier, but its industry has been
hit hard by war, sabotage, and mismanagement under the regime of ousted
President Saddam Hussein.
"Iraq presents its own special challenges," said Lunde.
(SNIP)
The talks were requested by Iraq, which is seeking help in such areas
as training and technology, Lunde said. Ministry spokesman Espen Gullikstad
said Norway envisions a three-year, $3.8 million program.
Lunde said Norwegian aid could include training and education for Iraqi
oil officials, setting up regulations for oil field operations and accounting.
"Openness in accounting for money coming in and going out from the
oil industry is very important," he said, adding that developing
countries often have problems with accounting, sometimes due to corruption.
Lunde said the Norwegian oil and finance ministries, as well as training
institutions and possibly private companies, will also be involved in
the project.
"But this would be a state to state agreement, and not a door opener
for Norwegian companies," he said.
Lunde said other countries, the World Bank and the UN are also likely
to become involved in efforts to help rebuild the Iraqi oil industry.
2//The Chosun Ilbo, South Korea Updated Mar.22,2005 19:40
KST
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news...
ROH HINTS AT NEW EAST ASIAN ORDER
President Roh Moo-hyun said Tuesday the power structure in East Asia will
shift depending on what choices Korea makes.
At a graduation ceremony of the Korea Third Military Academy on Tuesday,
Roh said Korea's new role was of a stabilizer for peace and prosperity
not just on the Korean Peninsula, but in East Asia as a whole. "Korea
will calculate and cooperate if need be, and move forward with its proper
authority and responsibility," he said.
His comments were being read as a pointed reference to the country's alliances
with the U.S. and Japan rather than a mere statement of principle. Among
core figures in the administration, there is growing dissatisfaction with
U.S. and Japanese policies in East Asia, including North Korea.
A high-ranking government official said the East Asian order in which
Korea plays one leg of the three-way alliance with the U.S. and Japan
was a product of the Cold War. He said Korea could not be locked into
such a framework forever. In other words, Korea wants to extract itself
from a standoff centered on the Korean Peninsula between a “southern alliance”
of South Korea, the U.S. and Japan and a “northern alliance” of North
Korea, China and Russia.
Another high-ranking government official cautioned the president was not
talking about breaking the Korea-U.S. alliance. But as tensions rise between
the U.S. and Japan on one hand and China and North Korea on the other,
Seoul will not be cornered into an exclusive alliance with Washington,
he added.
(SNIP)
When Roh met with U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Sunday,
he told his visitor that while the U.S. was in a position to view the
development of a particular order in East Asia as a strategic tool, for
Korea it was a matter of destiny. That amounted to asking Washington for
an alliance that was inclusive, not exclusive, the official explained.
The official said Roh was deeply concerned that Japan is hostile to both
China and North Korea and raising the level of tension. These concerns
formed part of the background to President Roh’s new doctrine of Korea-Japan
relations, he added.
President Roh’s address today can be seen as a warning that Seoul cannot
be counted on if the U.S. and Japan insist on a strategy of pressure on
China and North Korea. It was in an address to another graduation ceremony,
of the Air Force Academy on March 8, that the president made clear his
opposition to the deployment of the USFK in possible conflicts with China.
3//The Telegraph, UK (Filed: 23/03/2005)
http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/...
EU ARMS EMBARGO AGAINST CHINA SLIDES INTO CHAOS
By David Rennie in Brussels
The European Union's fragile consensus on lifting its arms embargo on
China was crumbling last night as Tony Blair arrived for a summit in Brussels.
Lifting the ban, an initiative spearheaded by France and Germany, appeared
certain only weeks ago.
However, the proposal to end the arms freeze provoked a furious reaction
from America and warnings from the US secretary of state, Condoleezza
Rice, that allies "should do nothing" to alter the balance of
power in Asia.
American anger, and apparent British second thoughts, were stoked still
further by China's passing of an "anti-secession law" last week,
authorising military force against Taiwan if it declared formal independence
from Beijing.
As Mr Blair flew to Brussels, Downing Street denied that Britain was leading
a covert drive to postpone lifting the embargo, which dates back to the
1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. The Prime Minister's official spokesman
played down reports that Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, had discreetly
reached out to EU counterparts in an attempt to delay lifting the ban.
Downing Street said Mr Blair remained convinced that a planned "code
of conduct" governing all EU arms exports to China, though non-binding,
could address US concerns.
Mr Blair's spokesman insisted that Britain was not pushing the issue and
that the key was forging a European consensus.
The arms embargo was not on the formal agenda for the summit, but senior
diplomats said they were braced for the thorny subject to be raised by
one or more EU leaders or foreign ministers.
British hopes for a fresh "consensus" appeared dim as French
diplomats vowed that President Jacques Chirac, who is keen to build up
EU-China ties, is committed to lifting the arms embargo.
The export ban is scheduled to be lifted as early as this June.
A spokesman for Javier Solana, the EU high representative on foreign and
security policy, said that "officially" that timetable remained
in place.
4//The Moscow Times, Russia Wednesday, March 23, 2005.
Issue 3130. Page 1.
http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2005/03/23/001.html
THREAT OF A KYRGYZ CIVIL WAR LOOMS
By Anatoly Medetsky, Staff Writer
The Kyrgyz opposition might have hoped to start a velvet revolution by
protesting parliamentary elections, but President Askar Akayev's decision
to use force appears to have brought the country to the verge of civil
war.
Moscow, wary of sparking instability in Central Asia, is taking a more
cautious role in Kyrgyzstan than it did in Georgia's Rose Revolution and
Ukraine's Orange Revolution.
The Kyrgyz opposition, which won just six of parliament's 75 seats in
recent elections, held peaceful street demonstrations that erupted into
violence when protesters started seizing government buildings in southern
Kyrgyzstan last week. The government responded by sending riot police
to retake the buildings -- a show of force that fueled protesters' anger.
Arming themselves with sticks, stones and Molotov cocktails, demonstrators
seized more federal buildings and the airport in Osh, the country's second-largest
city. Buildings have also been seized in nearby Jalal-Abad.
Northern Kyrgyzstan, including the capital, Bishkek, backs Akayev and
remains calm, but protesters on Tuesday boarded buses for Bishkek in an
effort to increase pressure on the government. The opposition is demanding
a revote and the resignation of Akayev, his ministers and election officials.
"The fierce confrontation may threaten the unity of the country,"
said Alexei Malashenko, an analyst with the Carnegie Moscow Center. "It
may tear apart the country and set off a war between the north and south."
Akayev has no one to blame but himself for the crisis because he ignored
the opposition for too long, considering it "flabby," Malashenko
said. In a sign of Akayev's confidence, his son and daughter ran and won
in the elections, he said.
Akayev also might have underestimated the protesters' determination, believing
that the opposition would back down if he sent in riot police, said Andrei
Grozin, analyst with the Commonwealth of Independent States Institute.
(MORE)
5//Inter Press Service New Agency, Italy Mar 22, 2005
http://ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=27969
PRIVATE SECTOR STILL EYEING TO OWN EVERY DROP
Anil Netto
PENANG, Malaysia, Mar 22 (IPS) - Selling water rights to private institutions
and then having people buy them back again is an issue that keeps rearing
its ugly head at every World Water Day, which falls on Mar. 22.
Goaded by international financial institutions and corporate interests,
regional governments are pressing ahead with plans for more private participation
in water services. And yet all across Asia, water privatisation schemes
are failing to deliver clean and safe drinking water to communities, despite
forcing consumers to pay for a basic human right.
''If you look for a water privatisation arrangement that works ... I cannot
think of any,'' Manila-based Mary Ann Manahan, a researcher with Focus
on the Global South, told IPS in a telephone interview.
In contrast, the sterling performance of some major publicly managed water
utilities in Asia has demolished the argument that private sector participation
is the only way to improve efficiency.
Cities like Osaka, Phnom Penh and Penang, where water is publicly managed,
have outperformed Jakarta and Manila, two cities with massive privatisation
arrangements in several key sectors.
Osaka, for instance, has a non-revenue water level (NRW) - an indicator
of the level of unaccounted water and lost income due to leakages and
unpaid bills - of seven percent. This is an outstanding performance.
Phnom Penh records an NRW of 26 percent and Penang a commendable 19 percent.
In comparison, Jakarta has NRW of 51 percent and Manila 62 percent.
The British-owned Thames Water Plc and the French operated Suez-Lyonnaise
respectively operate the largest water privatisation schemes in Jakarta
and Manila.
The Public Services International (PSIRU), based in Britain, which analyses
the privatisation and restructuring of public services around the world,
revealed in a recent study that Sri Lanka's capital Colombo, where water
is publicly managed, has a water leakage level of only 23 percent compared
to a leakage level of 35 percent for the city of London covered by Thames
Water Plc.
''There has been an extremely high failure rate for private concessions
and long-term BOT (Build Operate Transfer contracts) which may get worse
if Suez and Thames leave their contracts in Manila and Jakarta,'' said
the study.
And yet, privatisation schemes are being pushed with vigour by international
financial institutions such as the World Bank and the Asian Development
Bank, coupled with lobby groups such as the Global Water Partnership and
the World Water Council. Manahan points out that the World Bank has increased
its lending on water projects from 546 million U.S. dollars in 2002 to
three billion U.S. dollars in 2005.
''But there is no clear indication that this has led to cleaner, more
affordable water for people on the margins,'' she said.
In addition, the European Union has come up with initiatives in the World
Trade Organisation to prise open national water services to the big foreign
players. Indeed, since the mid-1990s, developing countries have been coaxed
to privatise water services through 'public-private partnership' or private
sector participation.
But many of these schemes in Asia have had disastrous results: soaring
water tariffs, unmet targets, and crippling financial losses and debt.
Faced with embarrassing results, several Western multinationals that once
thirsted for water privatisation projects in Asia have tried to make a
quick exit from loss-making or problem- saddled privatisation agreements
in Asian countries. Instead, they are now restricting themselves only
to sure-fire problem-free projects or 'safer' markets like Japan and South
Korea.
(MORE)
|