February 23, 2005

The BuzzFlash Mailbag

The opinions expressed in the Mailbag are not necessarily those of BuzzFlash. Read the BuzzFlash FAQ for info on submitting to the Mailbag.


Subject: On The Ins and Outs . . .

BuzzFlash,

I don't think people should worry about Gannon being "outed publicly," when he put himself on several websites advertising his tax-free business . . . that's a pretty full-blown outing. I think we also know that the "Gay" issue coming from the White House, before an election, is only there to split Americans when they vote . . . the White House knew plenty about Gannon and the Republican Party has many Gay members. Gannon was "in like Flynn." Look at the pictures . . . how many strangers does Bush hug . . . besides Lieberman.

We don't know how many other people in the White House are Gay. Do we? That is not the real issue. The real issue is that our White House has swinging doors and that has always been the issue. Bush doesn't think he works for Americans. He thinks he owns the White House and can do whatever the hell he wants to do and allow whomever he wants to into the White House on his say so and only on his say so. Gannon is just one unknown that we now know about. He's mid-forties. I would be real interested in the last 20 years of his life. Just out of curiosity, because he "seemed" to be such a fast climber within the Bush Loyals. Gays do not have access to our military . . . but if they were a pseudo reporter, they could have access to critical information in the highest office of the US. Gay interpreters of the Arabic language were fired for being Gay . . . they didn't know how to speak Bushit.

It's not the first time and it won't be the last time that we see the Hypocritical Republican Party use social issues for getting votes from Americans who vote their prejudices. Gay issues, Religious issues, Black issues, Minority issues, Women's issues . . . when people start being prejudiced against the Republican Party because of what it stands for today, then I will feel that the American public have been revived . . . wealthy people do not have to live by the rules they put in place for everyone else. That's the reality. I don't feel sorry for Gannon because Gay or not Gay, he has been complicit in what I consider illegal activity and I'm not talking about his tax-free business.

Gannon will be another person that bites the dust and takes the blame alone, instead of Bush and his comrades, who keep going on with their secret, bargain-basement business-as-usual in the White House until the next crime is committed. How many crimes does it take to get a Bush out of office?

Just wonderin . . .

Thanks BuzzFlash,

Shirley Smith


Subject: BUDGET

Dear W,

What a budget!

There's so much I like about it, but I want to thank you specifically for your efforts to slash 150 programs that benefit middle-class and working-class Americans. Who needs the Centers for Disease Control? Who needs a world-class public education system? Who needs police officers on the streets? Not me. That's why you cut the successful COPS program by 96 percent. That's right, 96 percent!

I was most impressed that your budget completely "overlooked" the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which will cost at least $350 billion over the next 10 years. (I make my corporate accountants do the same thing when we cook the books.) Brilliant!

You also did a great job of ignoring the costs of our plan to eliminate -- I know, I know, I'm supposed to say "privatize" -- Social Security. Sure, Social Security is running a huge surplus (unlike the rest of our government). And yes, your Social Security plan would cost almost $5,000,000,000,000 over the next 20 years...but that doesn't mean you have to put it in your budget!

It's just a matter of time before public investments in schools, housing, and roads are a thing of the past. In no time, the middle class will struggle further to make ends meet, working three jobs while we reap even greater profits off their backs. I can't wait!

Our joyful journey continues: More backdoor tax cuts for the richest 0.01 percent! More hidden costs for the middle class! Take from Main Street and give to Wall Street! Make Social Security neither! Budget cuts for schools and police! Huzzah!

Sincerely,

William Rosen
Kansas City, MO


Subject: Major Bush gaffe

Dear Buzz:

I'm watching CNN right now (Feb. 22), covering the president speaking at the United Nations. An audience member asks both the president and the UN speaker on stage with the president a question. After Bush answers his question, he thanks everybody, rushes over to shake hands with the UN speaker, in a hurry to leave, completely forgetting that the UN speaker has not yet had his turn to answer the question.

What an embarrassment. So what does CNN do? It cuts the sound (while the UN speaker is answering the question) and brings in Soledad O'Brien, who dutifully summarizes Bush's comments about our incessant "march for peace."

I am so sick of TV news cutting out vital parts of live coverage, constantly covering up for Bush's gaffes, never EVER giving anything but adoring, damage-control coverage for this president.

You can bet the bloggers will have a field day with this one, though, haha: "Bush, alarmed at having hard, unscripted questions lobbed at him in Europe, makes a quick exit---oops, major faux pas--the other speaker hasn't finished yet. Priceless!"

A BuzzFlash Reader

[BuzzFlash Note: It was probably a NATO gathering where this happened, not the UN. We saw Bush's goof on Olbermann/Countdown.]


Subject: Bush In Europe

Please, someone ... why does your trigger-happy President insist on calling heads of state by their first names? I find it extremely offensive and an indication of the arrogance (or is it simply stupidity?) of Bush when he says things like "Every time I meet Jacques he gives me good advice." It was terrible in the debates with Kerry when he referred to Putin several times as Vladimir. Never do you hear anyone refer to Bush as just George, especially by another political person. You have an awesome site. Thank you!

from Toronto

[BuzzFlash Note: We cringed, too.]


Subject: Liberal vs. Conservative compassion

It's interesting these days on how people are marked by the charity with which they associate themselves. Animal rights means interfering with animal experimentation? No. Try defending these creatures from brutal mistreatment. Sponsoring on behalf of the prevention of child abuse means interfering with parental rights? I don't think so. How about applying that biblical parable about how we treat the least among us, especially if they are our own children? Supporting a battered womens' shelter turns off those opposed to feminism? Huh? How about it being extremely anti-woman to NOT support such a shelter, not to mention to possible breakup of families? Or are these so-called moralists not as pro-family as they claim to be?

And, then, of course, there is the Bush Senior/BIll Clinton trip to Asia to witness the damage by December's tsunami. It's true that most, if not all, of us would agree that to represent the United States is more than worthy. It is the right thing to do. After all, the tsunami was a horrible natural disaster and not, as at least one neoconservative pundit put it in so many words, "God's will" (because of the supposed sex trade going on in Thailand).

Yet, a man who claims that God wanted him to become President decides to unilaterally bomb a sovereign nation which was no threat to the safety and security of the U.S. Since this man was God-appointed, he cannot be questioned about any actions he has taken, and cannot be held accountable for more than roughly 1,500 [American military] dead and many more wounded.

Was, and is, this man really following God's orders? Or, does he just think that he IS God?

Just let Ann Coulter try to get away with her "Conservatives feel they are the image of God while liberals think they ARE God" comments now.

Lisa
Boston, Massachusetts


Subject: The hoopla about the "revelations" of the Bush's tapes

Dear Buzzy,

With all that hoopla about the Bush's tapes and its "revelations," the whole thing seems to be another one of Karl Rove'S clever ploys and machinations. I wouldn't be surprised if the whole conversation was scripted and planned and George W knew he was being taped. From all that was "revealed," George W came out looking good and wise. Yes, he tried marijuana in his youth, what an earth shattering revelation!!

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Jim Wallis on God's politics

I understand where Jim Wallis is coming from when he argues that the Right wing have co-opted God, faith and values and claimed them exclusively as their own. But, I can also understand why the Left has seemingly embraced a more secularist view.

Secularists, at least to me, encompass values that do not necessarily need to have a religious or biblical view to back them up. Caring for the least among us, the civil rights of all who contribute to a society, and not casting stones and being judgmental are, to me, universal and not limited to any one religious faith. When the Right started its moral crusade after Goldwater's defeat in 1964, they began an intense campaign to paint anyone not fundamentally Christian as someone not worthy of any care, of any civil rights, and ripe for judgment picking. The Right's view of religion, of God, of so-called "moral values" of course has turned off many who see themselves as Left of center; and, unless we all can sit down and rationally discuss religious faith, or even the absence of religious faith, in a rational manner, the Left will not (nor should they) embrace a religious view of intolerance and ignorance.

I don't want a religious war to intensify in this country any more than anyone else who cares about the well-being of its citizenry. But, a religious war will start, or, rather, intensify, if the Right, not the Left, [do not?] change their collective attitudes.

Lisa
Boston, Massachusetts


Subject: "secret Tapes"

I agree with your reader, Shirley Smith, when she questions the validity of these supposedly "secret tapes." After a couple minutes of listening to a network broadcast of them, my husband started rolling his eyes and I started laughing. It was so obvious they were fake! My husband asked the TV, "Who are you kidding?" The tapes reveal nothing we didn't already know, but portray Bush as fairly articulate and reasonable, and that we know isn't true. Ahh, distractions, distractions...Karl's job is so much fun!

Scheri Janssen


Subject: Hillary

Chatting up McCain notwithstanding, Hillary has impressed NY Republicans from the start. Why? Because when she meets with various constituents, like the dairy farmers, etc., she shows up prepared. She's totally familiar with the nuts and bolts of their concerns, she knows their issues, and they don't have to waste time educating her on matters. That's impressive.

Rosamond


Subject: Clinton and Bush, sr.

Has anyone except me...noticed the strain on Bill Clinton lately? Almost since the beginning of this tour of the Tsunami region...Clinton has looked sick. He looked much better campaigning for Kerry, three weeks after his surgery! There are even times, when Bush, Sr., is speaking that he looks very uncomfortable. I have a feeling that this is a humanitarian effort at its worst! Clinton, I think does not feel good about the diversion he and Bush, Sr., are causing. Most people...5 years ago...would have thought Clinton would have tainted the good name of Bush! Now, what is this, an effort to boost the bad name of Bush??? God knows...that needs to be done...even though the mainstream press will never do it...the name of Bush is not good...Canadians do not like the name...many Americans are getting damned sick of it...and many Europeans think he is a dimwit...and most Englanders, other than Blair. I am embarrassed by him, most of the time...and I think at last he may be in deep doo doo! And of course, there is the Jeff Gannon/Guckert mess that has to be embarrassing to everyone but Bush, whom nothing embarrasses!

Shirley................St. Louis

PS: a poll out this morning...has Hillary Clinton even leading in the republican poll...for president in 2008...that has to be embarrassing...I cannot wait to hear what Rush does with that little tidbit!!!


Subject: As You Like It

As You Like It - William Shakespeare All the World’s a stage and the men and women merely players

George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, John Negroponte, Karl Rove, and a wide cast of characters will be coming to your country soon. After a four-year stint and continuing in the US, plus a trial balloon in Afghanistan and Iraq, the cast of characters will take their act on the road to Iran, Syria, Korea.

This thrilling dramatization of 21st Century power is produced and directed by the PNAC [Project for the New American Century.]

Cathy L.


Subject: Jim Wallis interview

Thanks so much for helping to draw attention to Jim Wallis. I really like the interview you did with him. It gets at some important questions and helps further the dialogue about religion that Dems need to be having among themselves. Great job!!!

Thanks again,

Mike Pridmore


Subject: LOL

Homeland Security officials in the Bush administration are considering ways to use the insurance industry as a free-market-friendly vehicle to drive chemical facilities, food companies, utilities, and other businesses to take greater precautions against terrorist attacks without heavy-handed new regulations.

US sees insurers as possible tool in terror fight (Boston Globe)

Let's see if Rush Limbaugh screams night and day about how "Washington DC is interfering with business and trying to regulate through legislation" like he did whenever Democrats enacted legislation intended to encourage good environmental practice, for example.

Rosamond


Subject: Outrage at the mainstream media (as sent to many of them)

I am surprised and disappointed that the mainstream media has devoted little, if any coverage to the "Jeff Gannon" scandal in the White House press corps.

Mr. Gannon, a fake reporter who espouses family values GOP-style, pretends to write for a pretend news agency called Talon News, itself an extension of gopusa.com, has been in bed with Scott McClellan since at least 2003 [so to speak], lobbing pretend questions to the press secretary, including some culled from the Rush Limbaugh show.

The intrepid reporters who make up the White House press corps shared a room with this man, who they must have known was a fraud, and said absolutely nothing. Indeed, it was those much-maligned "liberal bloggers" who exposed "Gannon" for what he is: a fraud.

Your newspapers made ... a big deal of Dan Rather being passed forged documents, but you say nothing now when the administration is caught red-handed trying to manipulate the media. I wonder if your lack of outrage betrays a desire that the events pass without further embarrassment?

Sincerely,

William Rosen
Kansas City, MO


Subject: Re Justice Department Caves In: Allows Publication of Retroactively Classified Information

Well, why wouldn't they give up, I ask you. After all, the election is OVER. Furthermore, the public now knows that out of 102 terror warnings Bush and his crooked, lying, thieving pals received prior to 9/11, 52 of them related to air transportation security. Kind of like the cat's already out of the bag, eh?

The big question is, when will the the FBI's Inspector General's report be declassified and the state secret classification be rescinded so that Sibel can pursue her lawsuit against the U.S. government for wrongful termination?

SherAn


Subject: Feds Order Beloved Teacher Deported

WHY??????????????? I AM FILLED WITH TOTAL HATRED FOR OUR GOVERMENT. I WANT TO VOMIT ON A DAILY BASIS. I am surprised I have not had a heart attack and I am only thirty years old.

Feds Order Beloved Teacher Deported (ABC News)

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Big Brother or a Friend of Big Brother . . .

BuzzFlash,

When we have an administration in power that is capable of anything . . . large crimes tend to stand out, and the last paragraph that I quote here should make people wonder if "Big Brother" is involved. This is what happens when people are not brought to justice for previous crimes. The crimes will keep happening as long as the Bush administration is in power. We can count on it. Whether they are complicit or not . . . they are not about the business of running a government . . . they are about the business of ruining a government.

"We are getting very close to `Big Brother is watching you, '' U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., said during a news conference Monday. "If this is not an eye-opening threat to our privacy, then nothing is.''

...ChoicePoint is one of the largest warehouses of personal data in the country. The Georgia-based company keeps a massive store of records that includes everything from an individual's date of birth and Social Security number to their employment history and driving records. Employers, loan officers, law enforcement and media outlets, among others, pay ChoicePoint for access to its databases....

PAST SCANDALS

Publicly-held ChoicePoint is no stranger to controversy.

In 2000, it bought Boca Raton-based DBT, a data collection company that had its contracts with the Drug Enforcement Administration and FBI suspended because its founder was once suspected of ties to Bahamian drug smugglers. DBT also was hired to help build Florida's infamous felon list for the 2000 presidential election. Many of those people, who were purged from voter rolls, were actually eligible to vote.
 
Thieves get data on 10,000 in state (Miami Herald)

It's every day folks. Every single day of the Bush administration and yet, our members in Congress remain silent . . . media remains silent . . . is it because Democracy in America is already dead? It wouldn't be the first time that a crime was committed for other reasons than those that seem so obvious . . . or because of the connection to the Bush administration . . . this company is allowed to commit crimes without being punished. I don't believe in coincidences when it involves the Bush administration.

How many crimes does it take to remove Bush from office?

Just wonderin . . .

Thanks BuzzFlash,

Shirley Smith


Subject: The Pope

Dear BuzzFlash,

So, the pope calls homosexuals "evil," but promotes Bernard Law, guardian of child molesters, to one of the top positions in the Roman Catholic Church. I can now say that I am more in tune with the teachings of "Christ" than the pope himself. If this man is "holy," I am GOD.

Rob Moitoza
Seattle, WA


Subject: The Lameness Of The Left

Definition of lameness: adj. lam·er, lam·est Disabled so that movement, especially walking, is difficult or impossible: Lame from the accident, he walked with a cane. A lame wing kept the bird from flying. Marked by pain or rigidness: a lame back. Weak and ineffectual; unsatisfactory: a lame attempt to apologize; lame excuses for not arriving on time.

To whit; the same group that excoriated John Kerry have now been "hired" to push the Administration's trashing of Social Security. Like """DUH""" how come the left is so far behind the curve? The Right is so far ahead of what's going on, might I dare say it: There is a coordinated effort from the Right, to repeat; A COORDINATED EFFORT FROM THE RIGHT!!!!. Like, maybe there is a conspirancy? Or is it just excellent politics.

Three decades ago HST had the gonzos to 'tell it like it is.' And now we belatedly praise HST. Will his legacy be thrown into the dumpster of today's 'journalism' that is a garbage pit today? Or will he be resurrected to the hights of Ambrose Bierce, H. L. Mencken or even Mark Twain? In an age when Franz Kafka, George Orwell and Phillip K. Dick have become quaint, we are in some deep doo-doo, to quote George H. W. Bush. All of HST's drug-addled, brilliant, caustic and yes, truisms are becoming today's obits for a true rebel. Is it too late? Unless, unless we take the same high road that he took, we are all doomed. Might as well take a .45 to the head also if we don't do something NOW. Forgive me for paraphrasing, "Suicide is an act of faith because one refuses to put up with the bullshit."

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Sex toys, only for prescribed uses in Alabama according to the Supreme Court

This is one of the stupidest things I have ever heard of and things are pretty stupid in the Oklahoma legislature. One of our brain-damaged democrats has suggested putting itty bitty boxing gloves on the spurs of roosters to preserve the “sport” of cock-fighting.

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected on Tuesday a constitutional challenge to an Alabama law that makes it a crime to sell sex toys. The high court refused to hear an appeal by a group of individuals who regularly use sexual devices and by two vendors who argued the case raised important issues about the scope of the constitutional right to sexual privacy.

Court won't rule on sex toy ban (Reuters/CNN)

I guess you are allowed to use one, but you have to drive to Florida to buy one.

The law prohibited the distribution of 'any device designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs.' First-time violators can face a fine of up to $10,000 and as much as one year in jail.

I guess you could find something else they are useful for, like maybe for making milkshakes and then you could sell them. Wow, $10,000 and as much as a year in jail?

The law, adopted in 1998, allowed the sale of ordinary vibrators and body massagers that are not designed or marketed primarily as sexual aids. It exempted sales of sexual devices 'for a bona fide medical, scientific, educational, legislative, judicial or law enforcement purpose.'

Where do they buy them and is there a sign that says; "We check ID's and it better not be for recreational use"?

Here's my prescription, and the Doc and I plan for a night of "bona fide medical" use.

We have to have it for a scientific, educational assignment for Home and Family Living class and we have a permission slip from our teacher.

Here are my teaching credentials and we are using it in Sex Ed class to demonstrate what fun you can have without having actual pre-marital sex.

I plan to use it to educate my girlfriend on the finer arts of artificial love-making.

I am Senator/Doctor Frist and we are handing them out to use, congressionally, to stay awake during filibusters by democrats who want to keep sex-obsessed prudes off the bench. Congressionally is the same as legislatively or is this a state's rights thing?

I can tell you Oklahoma is way too conservative to allow the legislature to use sex toys during sessions, no matter how boring it gets. I have been to some sessions that would cure insomnia. What in the world could you possibly need one for, legislatively speaking?

They just forced Judge Thompson off the bench in Oklahoma for using one of these devices, judicially, while on the bench. You could hear it on the court reporter's recorder. I guess he could move to Alabama.

Of course using them on prisoners for torture is alright, as long as they don't enjoy it. Are there other ways law enforcement might use them? They sure could liven up those FOP meetings.

Georgia and Texas are the only other states that restrict the distribution of sexual devices, according to the court record in the case.

How completely asinine can you get? Were the Supremes judiciously using vibrators during this debate?

Karen Webb
Moore, OK


CLICK HERE FOR PART 2 OF THE FEBRUARY 23, 2005 BUZZFLASH MAILBAG.