January 31, 2005

The BuzzFlash Mailbag

The opinions expressed in the Mailbag are not necessarily those of BuzzFlash. Read the BuzzFlash FAQ for info on submitting to the Mailbag.


Subject: Social security

Dear Buzz:

Bush claims there will be a funding crisis in social security and a cut in benefits;
so, he then puts forth a plan that guarantees a funding crisis and a cut in benefits.
What a guy.

All that needs to be done is raise that $87,900 limit on income subject to FICA tax to an appropriate level and good-bye crises for a long, long time. I know some people, who will never need social security, may resent helping to pay for the rest of us, who worked our asses off to make them rich. They will survive.

Dave in WV


Subject: Torturegate

Dear BuzzFlash,

At what point will the actions of the Bush administration rise to the level of a "gate?" During the Clinton years everything was a "gate" (i.e. travelgate, filegate, etc.) We have gone through 4 years of Bush scandals with none being described as a "gate." The so-called mainsteam "liberal media" has been doing a very poor job, therefore it is up to BuzzFlash to elevate the Bush scandals to the "gate" level which they deserve. From now on you should refer to torturegate, payolagate, etc.

Daniel Fee
Ft Lauderdale, FL


Subject: Letter to BuzzFlash

As I read the news day after day, I cannot understand how the American people continue to support policies that are devastating to their own self-interest. Our greatest threat comes from the mammoth debt that President Bush has accumulated. He changed a projected surplus into rivers of red ink as far as the eye can see. Americans seem to believe that this debt ($7½ trillion and still mounting) doesn’t matter. The projected deficit for the coming year is more than $400 billion (not including the $80 billion or more for the war and the trillions needed to extend the tax cuts). If his Social Security privatization is passed, that’s another $2 trillion of “transition” cost and does not take into account the very real possibility that our enormous debt will cause another stock market decline.

These are more than incomprehensible numbers. These are the future of our country, and the future is bleak. With both the trade and budget deficits, we are coming closer and closer to economic disaster. Foreign governments hold a quarter of our debt. Because our debt is growing, investing in the United States becomes a greater and greater risk. That means we must raise our interest rates to attract foreign investors. China has already said that it regards the U.S. currency as risky and is looking to other countries to invest their surplus funds. If the value of the dollar continues to drop, imports become more expensive, and prices rise for everything from oil to t-shirts. Combining higher interest rates and higher prices means financial devastation for most Americans.

There is no free lunch. As debt and interest rates rise, Americans become poorer and poorer. We must repay the IOUs that are held by the rest of the world, and we don’t have the resources because of Bush’s tax cuts. Bush is willing to sacrifice the average American in order to continue his enrichment of the rich. Somehow we must wake up before it’s too late. We must tell our elected officials we will no longer accept their disinterest in our well-being. The 2006 elections are not that far off.

Marlene Aderman
Roseville, CA


Subject: Why Christians should not embrace Bush as leader

Jesus says "And do not be called Leaders; for One is your Leader, that is, Christ. Matthew 23:10

As a Christian, I am sick of seeing people worship Bush and attacking anyone who doesn't bow down to him.

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Three comments

Dear BuzzFlash,

I'm writing for three reasons. Thank you for always being there, holiday or work day or weekend - Buzz never goes off on vacation.

The second thing was this idea that your headlines are offensive. They're meant to grab attention and often to be funny. Someone doesn't find it funny? Okay, well if my best friend Buzz tells a joke that's not funny, I might not laugh. I might even feel the need to weigh in. But I wouldn't say, "Buzz, get it together, girl! You need to change now!" Buzz is a great friend. I like all your jokes, even the corny ones! Keep the humor.

Third, Matt Carmody was kind enough to share his opinions. Shirley did today. Both are allowed to their opinions and I thank them both for sharing. My own opinion is that things were better under Clinton than they are now; however, I did not then and do not support the welfare reform (aka war on the poor). I'm glad some love Clinton (Bill or Hillary). I don't. I like them. And when either's wrong, I'll say so.

I appreciate that both Matt and Shirley shared their opinions and I hope that we can continue sharing and accepting that some on the left will not feel exactly the same as I do, or Matt does or Shirley does. And though I'm a lifelong Democrat, I hope we'll remember that Buzz has Green readers and others and all are welcome to express their views.

Keep buzzin' Buzz!

Martha


"The 1400 Americans killed in Iraq and the 10,000 American casualties are the equivalent of a full division of our Army -- and we only have ten active divisions. "

The above statement is from Senator Kennedy's Jan 27 speech.  The dictionary defines the word "decimate" to mean to reduce by 1/10th.

Therefore, the U.S. army has truly, and accurately been "decimated" in Iraq.

R. Jackson


Subject: The Iraqi election

The fall of Baghdad didn't do it. Killing saddam's sons didn't do it. The capture of saddam hussein didn't do it. The handover of "authority" to an "interim Iraqi government" didn't do it. Maybe the election of a 275 member National Assembly, to select a president and committee to then draft a constitution will see us finally "turn the corner" on Operation Iraqi Freedom, bringing "stability," "democracy" and "liberty" to "the region."

The election we heard so much about during, prior to, and since the presidential campaign is finally here. It's funny how many people thought (and still think) it is an election to directly select a president in Iraq. Details weren't that important during the last presidential campaign. This Sunday brave Iraqi citizens, some outside the country, will go to the cardboard voting booth and select 275 leaders out of a field of 7,471 candidates from 111 different parties. One candidate is the former friend of the neo-cons, ahmed chalabi. Will the man who helped CONvince the administration and their closest friends of saddam's weapons of mass destruction, as well as saddam's connection to al qaeda for $300,000 a month be part of the government we've spent so much blood and treasure building?

Eight candidates have been murdered, polling places have been bombed, and foes of this election (and anything else the United States is a part of in Iraq) have threatened more intense violence leading up to and on election day.

The intimidation involved in this election makes what happened in the Ukraine look like a Board of Education election. The world's standards on legitimacy for this election will have to be minimized, if not waived all together. The fact that there are no neutral foreign observers monitoring the vote is, in itself, proof of this.

One can only hope that somehow a civil war doesn't break out, and our troops can be brought home [like] the Ukraine, Poland, Hungary, Portugal, and Denmark are planning to.

There was a great speech given at the Johns' Hopkins School of International Studies by Senator Edward Kennedy on America's future in Iraq. In it he describes how "We need a serious course correction, and we need it now." He also addresses the possibility that "We have reached the point that a prolonged American military presence in Iraq is no longer productive for either Iraq or the United States. The U.S. military presence has become part of the problem, not part of the solution."

David C.


Subject: Democracy In Action -- In BuzzFlash's Mailbag

I couldn't agree more. It doesn't seem quite fair to take a news site that champions free speech to task for exercising their free speech.

Anyway, I just bought America 2014 from you and now have another book to scare the hell out of me.

Barbara in NYC

P.S. I like your headlines way more than the ones I see in the newspapers.


Subject: Republican Platform for the Second Term

1. Economic Plan

a. I got mine, now you go get yours.

2. Health Care Plan

a. Get plenty of rest, eat a balanced diet and exercise. Avoid stress. (And here's a low, low interest loan for some overpriced pharmaceuticals)

b. See 1a

3. Environmental Plan

a. Don't worry. The earth is doomed, so let's use it up as fast as we can.

4. Social Security reform

a. Influenza

b. Decreased longevity due to #2

5. Republican Morality

a. You can lie, cheat, steal, or kill, as long as you don't let anyone be gay or have an abortion.
 
Becky Miller
Moscow, Idaho


Subject: Still Insufficient: Printer for E-Voting Machines

Diebold has just announced adding a printer to their E-Voting machines ("voter-verifiable printer prototype for use with touch-screen electronic voting machines"). The key "missing" requirement is independently auditable -- not simply having a printed voter receipt. Did the voter's vote really get recorded in the machine as it was printed out? The requirement of independently auditable would allow voters (and 3rd parties) to independently verify a vote made into the total election count and stays in the total election count until the election is certified. We need to keep our eye on the bigger result we want here.

A BuzzFlash Reader
Redmond, WA


Subject: Barbara Boxer

Why don't we call Barbara's challenge to the administration the "Boxer Rebellion" and have readers join?

A BuzzFlash Reader

[BuzzFlash Note: It's catchy. Do you think she would like it?  Here's an interesting historical note about the first Boxer Rebellion.]


Subject: Rude Pundit on Cheney

I use BuzzFlash often and until today have had nothing but positive to say about the posts; however, Rude Pundit's bit on Cheney is definitely crude, personal, bad taste, and should be removed to maintain your integrity.

Anne in Upstate New York


Subject: Al Quaida suspect arrested in Germany received orders directly from Bin Laden

but the US doesn't consider him important.... is that why the only Quaida suspects actually arrested are by countries NOT part of the great coalition..... (is Bin Laden still being protected by the Bush family because he might spill some beans?)

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,339160,00.html

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Cheney's inappropriate outfit was no accident

I think Cheney's inappropriate outfit was a deliberate sign to many in the far right that hold anti-semitic views and opinions that refuse to believe the holocaust even happened. This group does nothing by accident. I say it was intentional. He wore appropriate clothing for the inauguration and it was even colder. He didn't fly commercial airlines and had his luggage lost. And he showed up the next day with the correct clothing after being criticized. Now just why would he wear his snow blowing get-up to a most solemn occasion that highlighted the liberation of a torture camp? It is no stretch to see this act as a deliberate gesture to deny the reality of the holocaust. Perhaps Cheney thought the concentration camp tour was just a little outing to get better ideas for our own torture chambers. Sort of an on the job training seminar. That would explain the wardrobe mal-fashion. Mega faux pas!

BuzzFlash Addict


Subject: Transferring cost of war to Latin America is morally, politically wrong (Miami Herald)

Now U.S. officials seem to have hit on a new strategy to minimize U.S. casualties: recruit people from Latin America to do some of the fighting. A Dec. 9 Washington Post story reports that two U.S. private security firms, under contract to the Pentagon, are recruiting in El Salvador for people to do guard duty and other security work in Iraq. And a Dec. 12 report from El Tiempo in Bogota says that a major U.S. contractor is recruiting retired Colombian military officers to work in Iraq. Salvadorans and Colombians are apparently being recruited to guard embassies and other public buildings in Baghdad, protect oil and gas pipelines and provide security.

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Army Reserves wants my 13 yr old for cannon fodder

I am very disgusted. My 13 year old daughter received a recruiting brochure in the mail today. On the outside it says: Citizen. Soldier. Defender of Freedom. Inside: Be One of America's Most Powerful Weapons. "I am an American Soldier. I am a Warrior and a member of a team. I serve the people of the United States and live the Army values..." The soldiers' creed. Also on the outside of brochure: The Most Important Weapon in the War on Terrorism you. I have started a round of phone calls on this. I called the number on the flyer and had them remove her from their list.

The guy on the phone advised that the schools were one of the 3 avenues that would have submitted her information.

The other: self request drivers license application. I asked the school their policy, they said that they don't give out the info. I called the district administrator's office, they are looking into it. I expect to find out what Forsyth County Schools policy is on this. I told them what I thought of this idea of asking my daughter to participate in killing and raping people, and destroying their homes. I don't want my daughter to be a part of that. They must be running out of cannon fodder.

Regards,

Joyce in NC


Subject: Efforts underway to limit class action suits against corporations--urgent action req'd

President Bush, Sen. Frist and the Republicans are pushing a class action bill to limit the ability of consumers to have their day in court. Bush will talk about it next week during his state of the union address, the bill will be voted on Feb. 3 in Senate Judiciary Committee without even a hearing on it, and an opportunity for consumers to testify, and then it is scheduled to be the first bill voted on in the Senate on Feb. 7. Consumers will have a much harder time suing large, out of state corporations under this bill because the Republicans are shutting off the state courts and insisting that all consumer class action cases go to federal court where the judges are much more industry friendly.

A coalition of over 90 consumer, environmental and civil rights groups, the Coalition to Preserve Access to Justice is fighting this bill, and we need your help. Please get the word out to the online community to email your senator, urge him/her to vote against S. 5, the so-called Class Action Fairness Act, on Feb. 7.

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Neo-Nazi PNAC GOP Calls for Military Draft

BuzzFlash,

I realize it is Friday night, but here is the letter on the internet saying the neo-conservative Republican "Project for a New American Century" (PNAC) wants Congress to increase our troop strength 25,000 per year for several years. The only way to do that when recruiting and retention are falling sharply is with a military draft.

Using the slick and misleading euphemism, "to take the steps necessary to increase substantially the size of the active duty Army and Marine Corps," the neo-conservative Republicans who brought the world the failing Iraq War now want a full-scale military draft. The "back door draft" may turn into the "front door draft" soon – is Iran or North Korea next on the list for this cult of war mongering fanatics?

Letter to Congress on Increasing U.S. Ground Forces, January 28, 2005 (Project for the New American Century)

Thanks,

A BuzzFlash Reader


Hi BuzzFlash,

Just wanted to let you know, Governor Baldacci of Maine is actually a progressive's nightmare. And the piece on his stance on gay civil rights doesn't accurately reflect the real situation. Baldacci is part of a right-wing Washington, DC based cult called 'The Family.' This was reported by a local paper 'The Portland Phoenix.' He is in the process of decimating our Medicaid system, even cutting funding to group homes for people with mental illness (he's specifically targeted that group of people). When asked what people living in group homes should do, given that group home funding is being cut off, his rep responded 'live with friends or neighbors.' The guy's as bad as Bush.

As for gay civil rights, he's saying he won't send it out to referendum, BUT, he'll allow the legislature to do it (which is guaranteed). So he's just taking a safe position for himself politically. He will not stop attempts by the legislature to send it out, which is tantamount to supporting it. He's waffled on gay rights...he's not a great advocate at all. Just wanted to let you know that Baldacci's hardly a hero.

Best regards,

James (LOVE the site!)


I have a perfect prescription for Shirley Smith: Tell her to listen to Mike Malloy on AirAmericaRadio.com Monday through Friday at 7pm Pacific Time. Makes you feel sane again to hear that there are other liberals out there that are sick to death and tired of the traitors in the Democratic Party

Cindy
BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Al Gonzales

Rumor has it that Alberto Gonzales did a stint at the Air Force Academy as a POW torture specialist instructor. Human dog piles, urine, feces, hoods, were standard fare. Sound familiar? Randi Rhodes received a call from a former Cadet who exp'd this vile ordeal. developing ....

Mr.D
Panama City, FLA

[BuzzFlash Note: We only know he did attend the Air Force Academy.]


Subject: In response to Shirley ... St Louis

Shirley, I love reading your comments. I'd vote for you in a heartbeat. I wanted to respond to your answer to Gary Sartori...mailbag of 1/27/05.

I agree that the thing that killed the Gore campaign was his distancing himself from the presidency of Clinton. That Clinton was the "best president...since Roosevelt" is, I think, an exaggeration. That being said, I agree with everything else - including the advice to watch "Control Room."

I encourage BuzzFlash readers to watch "Hotel Rwanda" before reflecting with great fondness on the Clinton presidency. I don't know where my head was during the days of the Hutu and Tutsi, but I know where I am today. And I am both angry at President Clinton and ashamed of the behavior of the United States (and the UN) during the time of the genocide in Rwanda. It is incumbent on all of us who say that we care about (and oppose) the war in Iraq, and care about the conditions of the third world nations, to hound your representatives and senators to stop the killings in Sudan.

By the way, there is hope for your son. A close family friend was a HUGE Bush supporter, Fox News fiend, Sean Hannity/Joe Scarborough fan, and person-who-would-never-have-to-fight-in-the-war supporter of the Iraq war. After opening his mind to people around him and seeing the light, he voted for Kerry, talked his family into voting for Kerry, and is now ranting along with the rest of us every time the boy-king opens his mouth.

Leslie ....evanston


Subject: Alberto Gonzales bad choice for Attorney General

President Bush's choice of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General is a really bad decision. Alberto Gonzales was the one who wrote Bush's pro torture memo that led to American sponsored torture and murder at Abu Ghraib prison.

If America is going to portray itself as a civilized nation it has to send the world a message that behaving like Nazis is something that we don't condone. Alberto Gonzales who would be our chief law enforcement officer is someone who should be tried as a war criminal. He brings America down to the same level as the Muslim terrorists that we are at war with.

Torture is just plain wrong - period. You don't torture people. Alberto Gonzales doesn't seem to understand this. What kind of a country do we live in where people who believe in torture run the country? Alberto Gonzales makes us a nation of barbarians. Our enemies have won when we become like them.

I'm Marc Perkel - And I approved this message!

Marc Perkel
San Francisco, CA


Subject: Are we falling into a ditch?

IF THE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND, BOTH SHALL FALL INTO THE DITCH! -- Matthew 15:14

The news media is said to be our window to the world. If this window is clouded by dishonesty, how can the American people be expected to make proper judgments? If two wrongs do not make a right, both wrongs should be held accountable for their deception! At a press conference held recently, Mr. Bush's first answer to a question when asked about payola to Armstrong Williams was to say, "Armstrong Williams made a mistake!!" Only when pressed by a reporter did he admit the White House also made a mistake! He also qualified that remark with a statement that he did not know anything about it.

It is quite obvious that Mr. Bush never knows anything when it has to do with admitting fault! Since then, we have learned about two more incidents where this Administration has paid journalists for advancing Bush propaganda! The amount paid to advance Bush policies is not as important as the dishonesty. For a campaign and a Presidency that touts "moral values," paid communications do not back up their pious words! How many times and in how many ways does George W. Bush and his Administration have to be caught red-handed hammering one more nail in their coffin of corruption before the people and/or the Congress take action??!!

Every day we have more reason to question the integrity of George W. Bush and his Cabinet. The whole picture of their misrepresentations and deceit is condemning enough, yet each additional offense is quickly dispensed with by this Administration and the media as easily as swatting a fly off their nose. The trouble is that pesky fly keeps returning! Ignorance of a situation whether it is used in denial by George Bush, or dismissed by the public, who is ill-informed, is dangerous to our Democracy! We cannot afford to continuously jump on the bandwagon of indifference! It is crucial to us and our self-respect, as well as our nation"s respect, that we open our eyes and not be led by the blind.

As for the press, we appreciate their freedom. Justice George Sutherland said, "A free press stands as one of the great interpreters between the government and the people. To allow it to be fettered is to be fettered ourselves!" While the press should not be shackled, it also should be held responsible for presenting the truth to the American people and not be influenced by political gain or bribery!

Susan Carr
Tucson, AZ


Subject: Idaho and The Gay Marriage Issue

Idaho is now debating the issue of having the state constitution not only outlaw gay marriage but will not allow civil rights to gays either. No, I am not a homosexual but I do believe in equal rights for all Americans. Please flood their mailboxes with letters from all over the BuzzFlash community. Some of the legislators are concerned about the loss of tourist dollars and their intolerant image. I read in the paper yesterday that it was not until the 1950's that women could even own a business in Idaho without their husband being registered as the legal owner! Unbelievable! Let them know the whole country is watching. The real problems here are wife and child abuse. Kootenai County is number one in the number of meth labs (from yesterday's Idaho Spokesman Review). Only 44 per cent of high school grads here in Idaho go on to higher education (including voc tech.) Is it any wonder there are so many backward thinking citizens? It is a red, red, red, state but they do care about tourism.

Pisces
Idaho


Subject: Felon's Voting Rights

Dear Buzz,

I was reading the story on how Republican legislators, and influential Republicans in the state of Florida want Jebba the Hut to give back the voting rights of Felons. Why? His brother that slimy, pencil neck, beady-eyed, awol,war-monger, smirkfaced retard is already in the White House........ Ah...I see.....Jebba the Hut will look good to all Felons which might change their vote from Democratic to Repug when he runs for pRes in 08? Those electoral votes sure would come in handy when the system is rigged once more to let a Bushkavik in control of this sham of a gov't because Jebba the Hut sure wouldn't be doing it because of compassion or the tugging of heart strings.

A Loyal Buzz Fan Forever!

Sharon Carlton
Bellevue, Nebraska


Subject: Social Security -- Private accounts vs. personal accounts

Well, sir, the White House pressure to reframe its debate on Social Security deform (no, that's not a typo) to a matter of private accounts, as reported in the Washington Post and NYT, is bull. For four years it/they called them private accounts, talked about privatizing a portion of a wage-earner's government-mandated set asides, and about privatization in general. Now that their focus groups prove that privatization is not popular, that "private" polls 20 percent lower than the term "personal," they want to change the language.

Will you please tell me why in the hell The New York Times is playing this game? It is bull. But, but, but I suspect I know what's going on. Major media conglomerates are presently appealing a federal appeals court ruling against further media consolidation. So as a matter of self-interest, The New York Times is courting favor, hoping to influence that vote by accepting the White House's new terminology as it relates to the Social Security battle. Well, sir, that also is bull.

I request that -- since all your readers are not drooling morons and your management should not patronize us and should not assume we don't recognize its condescending attitude for what it is -- you forward a copy of this message to your BOD and senior management with the message that the White House obviously pays well for reporters and pundits to advance its positions, but, hey, they're criminals and the reporters/pundits were/are ethically challenged. Leave the fight to them. Let them sink or swim on the merits of their argument for privatizing Social Security, but do NOT aid and abet their criminality.

Sharon Andrews
Fort Lauderdale, Florida


Subject: Making me equal doesn't take anything from you and never has

I have been listening to the Ken Burns series on Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, for the umpteenth time, and am always struck by how 19th century the right wing heterosexual male still is.

The women folks have just held a convention up in New York and passed a sort of bill of rights affirming it their right to vote to become teachers, legislators, lawyers, divines and do all and sundry the lords now do. They should have resolved at the same time that it was obligatory for the lords, aforesaid, to wash dishes, handle the broom, darn stockings, wear trinkets, look beautiful, and be as fascinating as those blessed morsels of humanity whom God gave to reserve that rough animal, man, in something like reasonable civilization. -- Lowell Massachusetts Courier, 1848

In order to extend equal rights to any group; whether it be voting rights or marriage rights to women, blacks or gays, it is always interpreted as somehow taking some of the heterosexual male rights away.

If blacks are equal, then our women will not be safe. If women were equal then men become housewives. If gays are allowed equal marriage rights it will destroy marriage as we know it.

Only June Cleaver types wear trinkets and look beautiful while doing dishes, sweeping and darning socks and there wasn’t much fascinating about June and there still is nothing fascinating about housework, which is why men thought it would be degrading for themselves.

Isn’t it nice that in a time when women couldn’t vote, testify in court, sit on a jury, inherit property, get custody of her own children, keep their own wages or leave an abusive husband that this jerk would say she had the right to reserve anyone in any semblance of anything? She had no right to do anything to force him to behave. If she refused sex he could divorce her and take the children, she could never divorce him, even if he beat her and the children.

I am so stinking tired of this mind-set, so I am willing to let white heterosexual males keep all their rights, if they give the rest of us equal rights. So let's see if we can at least make it into the 20th century.

Karen Webb
Moore, Ok


Subject: an idea  

We all know that the Republicans have become very adept at getting their word out to their people. In that vein, I was thinking that since you reach so many people, why can't there be a site on your home page where we can get the word out to our people, e.g., by supplying websites or e-mail addresses of people or organizations to contact with our point of view. We can deluge people just as much as the other side can. Is this possible?

Marie

[BuzzFlash Note: We do have links at the bottom of our homepage to media outlets and government offices. These may be helpful at times of "Action Alerts."]


Subject: killing the innocent in Iraq

As I read this article by a Catholic nun, I am almost shaking from the anger I feel towards Bush et al. What will it take to get this country moving on the correct path again? I mourn for us and for our future. What have we as a nation done to this world that we all must share? When will we as a nation wake up to what the rest of the world must think of us?

What the Rest of the World Watched on Inauguration Day (National Catholic Reporter/Common Dreams)

Gail


Subject: Be careful what you say

"Sometimes you've got to start a fight to win one." These words, ennobled by Paul Wellstone, are the same words Bush used as a pretext for the invasion of Iraq. There is no moral certainty in the world. Just understand that while you value life, and certain people in high places seem to value it slightly less, be mindful of what you are really saying. If you find words you like, and you still like them after holding them up to the mirror of your reality, fine. But, if you hold your words up to the mirror, and they come back at you as their own evil twin, don't use them.

Paul Wellstone knew that bullying was not an answer, but he said a dumb thing, and you quoted his dumb thing. Now Bush has killed approximately 114,000 borrowing the same dumb quote. Wellstone and Bush were both wrong.

Starting fights leads invariably to unintended consequences. The most powerful position is that of the peacemaker, who brings a solution which satisfies both parties who didn't really want to fight in the first place.
 
Richard Mann
seattle/wa


Subject: Halliburton Scurries Mysteriously Out of Iran (Reuters/LA Times)

This is a most disturbing development. If any company might know the intentions of the Bush administration, it is surely Halliburton, via the Cheney connection. The company pulls out now, waiting for the inevitable "spread of freedom" (read: invasion) envisioned by "Our Leader." Then, after American troops are on the ground there, Halliburton goes back in under no-bid contracts to service the troops, just like in Iraq. Disgusting. And, where will it end?
 
A BuzzFlash Reader
New York


Subject: Freedom

I hear from Bush and from many who post how noble and godly our mission is in Iraq. Being a Christian I have gone to my Bible and to the life of me I have not been able to find that in my Bible. The only freedom we are promised is in Christ. Physical freedom and wordily prosperity and happiness are not promised but IN Christ. I would really like to know where they are getting this teaching....freedom for all......
 
A BuzzFlash Reader
OK


Subject: Buzzword Bingo for the State of the Union Address

We've got a free set of Bush buzzword bingo cards for the State of the Union Address up on our site.

The cards include words that Bush is likely or unlikely to use during his speech on Wednesday, February 2, 2005. Many of the words are like tombstones, markers for words that used to mean something, words that have been conscripted and lost in Bush's wars against all who don't think he's respectable. Some of the words still stand for something, so Bush is unlikely to use them. For me, listening to Bush speak is worse than a barium enema; maybe this can lighten it up a little bit.

http://ableplus.com/buzzwords/

Al Christians
Lake Oswego, OR


NEW LETTER TO CONGRESS FROM PNAC!!

PNAC has just written a new letter to Congress, and it's highly interesting to say the least:

So we write to ask you and your colleagues in the legislative branch to take the steps necessary to increase substantially the size of the active duty Army and Marine Corps. While estimates vary about just how large an increase is required, and Congress will make its own determination as to size and structure, it is our judgment that we should aim for an increase in the active duty Army and Marine Corps, together, of at least 25,000 troops each year over the next several years.

There is abundant evidence that the demands of the ongoing missions in the greater Middle East, along with our continuing defense and alliance commitments elsewhere in the world, are close to exhausting current U.S. ground forces.

So, if by "next several years" they mean 4 years, and taking their lower limit of "at least 25,000 troops," that's 100,000 new troops they're talking about.

If by "next several years" they mean 6 years, and taking a higher troop increment of 50,000 new troops each year, that would be 300,000 new troops.

Interesting. Gotta be ready to fight those new wars.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/defense-20050128.htm

Ken


Subject: Running From Arnold . . .

BuzzFlash,

Regarding the mailbag and the fact that I have seen advertised all week on A&E, See Arnold Run, I must confess I always thought they had higher standards than that. I don't plan on watching Arnold, I have had enough of him since he took over California, but I was just wondering if they are going to show Arnold running after every tit and ass and actually fondling them which most people would have sexual harassment court appearances in their background . . . but not so, if you are a rich Republican and a "star," nobody cares if you have any sense of morality. To me, Arnold's treatment of women is a prime example of how Republicans view women. It's amazing how these people seem to flock together.

When we celebrate, nominate and elect people such as Arnold Schwarzenegger without his taking any responsibility for his abuse towards females when he was in their presence . . . anyone else would have had a sexual offender offense behind their name because of what Arnold had been known to do . . . but in the US, we seem to celebrate the criminal and debasing of humanity if they are in politics, Republican or entertainment . . . it's okay and they are allowed to buy off everyone and keep their name clean even when their actions and their nose are not. No wonder our society is so screwed up. What kind of role model is "Schwarzenegger?" His wife plays the part of a "Kennedy gene" gone awry.

Just a thought,

Thanks BuzzFlash,

Shirley Smith


Subject: From Where I Stand: a must read on bush, death, and a child

BBC news announced that the picture was spreading across Europe like a brushfire that morning, featured from one major newspaper to another, served with coffee and Danish from kitchen table to kitchen table in one country after another. I watched, while Inauguration Day dawned across the Atlantic, as the Irish up and down the aisle on the train from Killarney to Dublin, narrowed their eyes at the picture, shook their heads silently and slowly over it, and then sat back heavily in their seats, too stunned into reality to go back to business as usual -- the real estate section, the sports section, the life-style section of the paper.

Here was the other side of the inauguration story. No military bands played for this one. No bulletproof viewing stands could stop the impact of this insight into the glory of force. Here was an America they could no longer understand. The contrast rang cruelly everywhere.

What the rest of the world watched on Inauguration Day (National Catholic Reporter)

Rex E.


Subject: Senator Rick Santorum, "GOVERNMENT OF, FOR, AND BY THE PEOPLE"

I just completed a 10 minute phone call with Senator Rick Santorum’s office. I phoned to ask if they keep a tally of the amount of calls they receive on any particular issue, and I was specifically interested in any constituent input his office had received regarding the vote to confirm the nomination of Condi Rice. She told me that they did have that information, but it could not be released to me, as it was for their internal use only.

After she put me on hold three times when she would not answer my simple repeated question, my call was transferred to a Santorum staffer named Josh. First Josh told me that yes, they do keep a tally. Then Josh told me that they keep a tally, but they only do so after the fact, after the vote. Then Josh told me that they have a good idea as to how much constituent input they receive, and which way the constituent input is leaning, either for or against. But then Josh told me that they discount a lot of the constituent input, if they believe that it was generated by any activism organization of any type. Then Josh told me that while the Senator does ask him (Josh) which way the will of the people is leaning, he told me that that does not determine the Senator’s vote. He told me that the Senator votes "his" conscience, "his" opinion, and "his" will, and not the will of the people.

So I again asked him if he would tell me if he knew whether the will of the people was in favor of, or against, voting for the confirmation of Condi Rice. He told me that the constituent input that the Senator’s office received; that the people were strongly in favor of voting against her confirmation. Of course Senator Santorum voted in favor of her confirmation.

So I switched the topic slightly, and asked Josh for his opinion of government of, for, and by the people. I told him that I thought that the Senator was supposed to represent the will of the people. I asked him what quantity of input or preponderance of demand on one side of an issue would encourage the Senator to vote accordingly. I asked "what if the Senator had received one million requests, and that 90% of them were against her confirmation?" Josh told me that while that would be significant, that the Senator would still vote his own conscience. I again asked about the part of representation being "of, for, and by the people." Josh told me that if I were to ask the Senator that personally, that the Senator would tell me that the U.S. is not a democracy, but rather a Republic, and while the will of the people might be of consideration, it is subordinate to the will of the Senator. Then he told me that if I don’t like that, too bad, and that my only option is at the voting booth in the next election.

Having written letters, sending emails, and telephoning my and other Senators, my Congressman, the President, and the Vice President – and those contacts totaling well over 1,000 in just the last 8 months alone – I can tell you that Senator Santorum is endemic of a much larger problem. And that is, with VERY FEW EXCEPTIONS, no one in government is listening to the people. No one. They are just doing what they want. And if you don’t know by now that our government is taking America down the toilet, then you are either a victim of government psyops brainwashing, media collusion, or you are simply disinterested or uninformed.

If you are aware of what our government is up to, and you are doing nothing, then get up off your ass, and do something. It doesn’t take much time, very little effort, and certainly no cost to email or toll-free phone a politician. It is inexcusable if you are doing nothing. It is time for all of us to rise up, start screaming, and bombard the government and media with our demands.

Will that achieve anything? I don’t know. But I hope so. So excuse me while I go write yet another letter, and make another phone call.

Don Barletta
State College, PA


Subject : An Open Letter To US Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL)

Greetings Senator Obama,

I was recently watching the confirmation hearings for Ms. Rice to become the next U.S. Secretary Of State. Although a good number of the questions that were asked of her were, to a degree, tough, but in this voter's eyes, as well as many others I'm sure, weren't tough enough, or, for that matter, seemed like punches were pulled, just to appease the critics of the atrocious and embarrassing policies and actions of the current administration. After reviewing the Senate's Committee on Foreign Relations vote to approve Ms. Rice's name to be forwarded to the whole United States Senate, I saw that the overwhelming vote of 16 yea to 2 nay [was] rather embarrassing as well.

I am extremely disappointed in your decision to vote in favor of Ms. Rice. It sends an early signal to voters that the Democratic Party has weakened considerably, and that this country is headed into a very dark direction for at least the next four years. This vote, in addition to the DNC's lack of integrity and strength in regard to the challenge of the Ohio voting statistics this past election, only shows that the Democratic National Party has given up, and the fight that was fought when the current 'regime' stole the election from V.P. Al Gore, drained any life the party had left.

Why didn't the DNC challenge the Ohio results? Even AFTER Diebold SETTLED for admittingly using ILLEGAL electronic voting software? There was such a strong case. And the DNC laid down. Other embarrassing issues that haven't been brought to light: Karl Roverer's dual citizenship between the U.S. and Germany, in addition to his family's historical connections to the 3rd Reich and the building of various concentration camps.

But, let's not stop there. How about the history of George Herbert Walker and Prescott Bush and the 3rd reich as well? Let's add in Chase Bank, Shell Oil, Standard Oil, General Motors Corp. of America as well as RCA Corp. of America, to list only a few. There are way too many issues that aren't being challenged hard enough, or at all, and the lack of attention will certainly bring the integrity of this country down even further. Not only in the eyes of the world, but the eyes of its citizens as well.

Don't get me wrong Senator, I REALLY do love my country, and I can appreciate what our forefather's went through to make it possible, but by the actions, or lack of, by the DNC, really makes me wonder about my government of today, and who do they really represent.

Thank you in advance for your time,

Sincerely,

Raymond D Bollacker - Pissed off American


Subject: Some of the Dems still Disappoint me

To the Dems that voted in support for Dr. Rice in the name of "the president has the right to choose who he works with," is just another example and reason how we have been strapped with the singing Attorney General, and the Rumsfeld. There is a reason for cabinet positions needing to be confirmed by the senate, and not just rubber stamped. You would think that they would understand that by now. Maybe they should stop crying about how they are treated by their follow members on the other side, and understand that a bully will always find and run over the weak.
 
Chris
New Orleans, La.


Subject: What A Joke.... Where are the Voters?

BuzzFlash,

I'm sitting here watching CNN, MSNBC, FoxNews, surfing the web and I see NO VOTERS at the polls.

There are like two ballots inside the clear plastic bin, and Fox, et al., keeps showing the two Iraqi Puppets President who voted...and NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE is voting in Iraq.

This is SUCH an embarrassment.... I can't wait to see how the Evil New World Media Spins their way out of this one.

Wouldn't doubt if some "Diversion" story takes over the news cycle instead of all the news stations showing empty voting booths.

What a Joke. Except, it's no joke.

Regards,

Noble Eagle
FIGHT THE FUTURE


Subject: Hypocrite of the week

Once again, using Gonzales as your hypocrite of the week, you show that you have no idea what the word hypocrite means. A hypocrite says one thing, and does the opposite. Gonzales never spoke against what he now champions. Just because you don't like someone, doesn't mean he's a hypocrite. Please look up the word in the dictionary so you can figure out who a real hypocrite is. In the future please title your piece "People I don't like" rather than using words you can't define or pronounce.

A BuzzFlash Reader
laguna beach, ca

[BuzzFlash Note: Our Webster's says hypocrisy is "pretending to be what one is not, or to feel what one does not feel; esp. a pretense of virtue, piety, etc." Gonzales' statement (here), and his actions as chief counsel to the president (see memo) reflect a person who says he will defend human rights, but wrote the justification for his government not doing so. What is that? To us, his prevaricating seems much worse than Clinton's meaning of "is" testimony.]


New facts I just saw on MSNBC: Voters must show 2 forms of ID, and must give fingerprints. Some random notes about the election and coverage:

The past few days, I have been watching news coverage about the Iraqi election in several major cable and network news shows. I haven't heard a single media voice ask whether the Iraqi voters know who or what they are voting for. No one has commented or reported on the information available to voters and its accuracy. In media coverage, "legitimacy" is apparently defined by turnout alone, with no other factors considered when discussing legitimacy.

The importance of the election's legitimacy has not been stressed, when it is mentioned. I have heard no news reporter, anchor or commentator mention the issue of whether the threat of insurgent attack and possible death to voters may compromise the legitimacy of the election. I have heard no discussion of what standards should be expected of any election in order for it to be considered a valid expression of the will of the people. I have heard no one ask how the vote count will be conducted or verified, or what laws and enforcement exist to prevent fraud. I have heard no one represent my opinion - that an election should express the verifiable and informed will of the voters, so there should be some accountable system in place to evaluate and demonstrate that result. If you hear any discussion of those points in US media, please let me know.

Scott


Subject: Surprise!!! 72% of registered voters vote, just like yesterday's late pred. of 75%

I guess they decided yesterday - the Bushies and their puppets - that a 75% turnout would be good for them...and with no observers, and 75% being such a round figure, they settled on 72%, and CNN already knows it.. the polls won't be closed for a while, but CNN wouldn't bother to send Christiane Aman Pour somewhere she wasn't going to be able to get a great scoop, would they? Isn't it all amazing and democratic?

Hurray for George Bush for bringing freedom and democracy to Iraq!!! (and for having all his favorite people elected, too...wow, that is SOME feat). On to Iran but, first, taking bows for this great feat in Europe. Ride on George, ride on Condi.

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Rupert Murdoch buys Al Jazeera, re-named Fox News Middle East

Ah, I can see it now. Al Jazeera gets put up for sale because it just won't toe the Bush administration's party line...and Rupert Murdoch adds it to his stable of right-wing stations for a few billion dollars. That's just pocket change to him, by the way.

Soon, Arabs in the Middle East will be treated to Abdul O'Reilly, Mahmoud Hannity, Mazaran Coulter and a host of other "no-spin," Republican Party-friendly commentators who aren't (wink, wink) on the Bush dole, but might as well be.

Arab viewers will see a daily dose of Iraqi men and women working and playing and being friendly toward U.S. military forces in Iraq. Car bombing? What car bombing? And Bush and the other neo-cons can sleep easier at night knowing that their "message" is getting through finally to Arab viewers in the Middle East.

Sincerely,

Paul Sorrells
Austin TX