December 13, 2004

The BuzzFlash Mailbag

The opinions expressed in the Mailbag are not necessarily those of BuzzFlash. Read the BuzzFlash FAQ for info on submitting to the Mailbag.


THIS IS PART 2 OF THE DECEMBER 13, 2004 BUZZFLASH MAILBAG. CLICK HERE FOR PART 1


Subject: Felony Fraud in Ohio

Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell has, by "locking down" the voting records of the state, committed felony fraud, by Ohio's own statutory definition, and must be prosecuted under that same statute. Furthermore, the lockdown is defined, by that statute, as a priori proof of fraud in the electoral process. There is no escape from this legal straightjacket, no way that any court in the land could find defendant Blackwell "not guilty" by reason of lack of incontrovertible evidence. He's running for his life.

Ohio Revised Code Title XXXV Elections, Sec. 3503.26 that requires all election records to be made available for public inspection and copying. ORC Sec. 3599.161 makes it a crime for any employee of the Board of Elections to knowingly prevent or prohibit any person from inspecting the public records filed in the office of the Board of Elections. Finally, ORC Sec. 3599.42 clearly states: "A violation of any provision of Title XXXV (35) of the Revised Code constitutes a prima facie case of election fraud within the purview of such Title."

Please, all honest citizens of this once-great country, PAY ATTENTION and CARE. Kerry/Edwards did not lose. WE did not lose. Stand up and demand justice for our country and our world.

Margaret T. Clark
Brooksville, Maine

Subject: Do we even need a recount?

Dear Sir/Madam,

I was just wondering...

Since we were not capable of holding a free and fair election here in Florida, nor in Ohio, hasn't the Constitution allowed for this? Surely since there is now documented evidence of fraud in both states their Electors should not be allowed to vote. This would mean that Bush has 223 electoral votes and Kerry 252, making him the clear victor. Even if Pennsylvania is shown to have similar problems, the electoral votes would still be 231/223 in Kerry's favor. I think that rather than trying to get a recount in Ohio, which will never be fair with Blackwell at the helm, we just need to show the courts that there was indeed widespread fraud in both states and that since these states were not capable of policing themselves, that they be excluded from the process. Wouldn't that be the fairest solution for all concerned? It is certainly in keeping with the wishes of our founding fathers.

Instead of scrabbling over every vote in Ohio, which may or may not prove possible, given the nature of the frauds committed, we need to say to Florida and Ohio that if they can't keep their own house in order that they cannot have a seat at the national table. I think that this would prove more effective in preventing this type of behavior among election official and politicians in future than any amount of laws ever would. The Republicans are always advocating state's rights and so, they should support the decision. The Democrats' advocating implementing Federal guidelines, would have less bipartisan support, and be too difficult and time-consuming to affect this years' election. Simply implementing a provision already in our constitution which is there to ensure that the individual states take responsibility for their own actions, seems like the only reasonable way forward at this point.

What are your thoughts?

BTW: My husband and I, as well as three other ladies are off to Tallahassee tomorrow morning (Sunday 12/12/04) to protest in the 51 Capital event, I hope we have a good turnout :-).

regards,

Rachel Latham
Jacksonville, Florida

[BuzzFlash Note: Sounds like a plan...Have you shared this with Kerry's lawyers?]


HI ...

1st, I LOVE YOUR SERVICE .... plz never stop.

i was wondering though if you would consider expanding your GOP HYPOCRIT section to include DEM HYPOCRITS as well ......... as a PROUD LIBERAL, i am beginning to feel a shift in the DEM leadership towards a more diet-REPUBLICAN ideology .... we need to see both sides, when a DEM is slouching towards the Conservative side, we need to know about it and let them know this is NOT acceptable.

the way i see it, the DEMS need to either shake up their party and really become PROUD TO BE PROGRESSIVE [liberal] or i am switching to the GREEN PARTY ... they may never win the presidential election, but at least i will have my integrity intact when i vote and i KNOW they care about the same issues i do and will fight for them.  and i know MANY who are beginning to feel this way.

the DEMS have to be proud to be liberal just the same as the REPUGS are proud to be conservative.  fuck the moderates, that's just what they are MODERATE ... we need passion and that's [at least] what DEAN was able to do ... he inspired the most passionate people in the base, the LIBERALS ... moderates sit at home, flipping channels, going tsk tsk, that's such a shame but there's nothing we can do ...... the LIBERALS care, they will fight, but we feel abandoned by the DEMS right now .... and the dissention is growing ...... if the Dems are not careful, they will continue to become REPUBLICAN-LITE and thus minimized to a benign entity that is propped up as an illusion of an opposition party to the NEO-CONS ...

thank you.

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Lack of coverage of the Conyers hearings (sent to NY Times)

Dear Sirs,

How startling and disappointing it is to read nothing about this critical issue in the pages of the nation's 'newspaper of record.' The fact that all the electoral 'glitches' now being revealed (seemingly in spite of major papers like the Times) exclusively favor the Bushites is clearly beyond the realm of coincidence.

You folks have largely betrayed the public trust throughout the Bush administration, and particularly with regard to Bush's war in Iraq. It's never too late to start doing your job, though. Thorough coverage of the 2004 election fiasco would be a good start.

Sincerely,

Chuck Van Wey
www.bushwatch.net/van.htm


Subject: Reid . . . Just Another Buss Boy for Bush . . .

BuzzFlash,

Regarding your Hypocrite of the Week, I think you hit it right when you said, Reid was just being himself. Reid is carrying on the Daschle tradition and he evidently loves to be loved by the Bush Boys. No real passion-ridden Democrat could say that about Scalia or any of the other members of the fake five of the Supreme Court, when in actuality, they all deserve to be impeached and should have been . . . or should be.

I have always held the idea that not only have the Republicans infiltrated every decent organization in the US, but have also infiltrated the Democratic Party or compromised many of the Democratic members in Congress.

Reid is no Democrat and he is another example of why this Party is gasping for breath right in front of our eyes and why I don't want anything to do with the DLC and when the DNC got in bed with the DLC, they quit representing the base of the Democratic Party too.

The DLC has done nothing except run interference for the Bush administration. Out here, away from DC . . . I can't believe when I hear this stuff and I wonder how do these people get into government, and how do they get into a leadership position and call themselves Democrats? It would seem that members of Congress such as Reid, care more about what the Republicans think of them than their own Party members. When we have Democratic members in Congress cross Party lines that enable the Bush massacre of our government, they also boost Republican morale and kill Democratic morale in the process. Whose side are these people on? They aren't idiots . . . so it's pretty evident, they aren't Democrats.

I yearn for the Democratic passion of Harry S.Truman and John F. Kennedy. I have never seen so many neophytes and so much nepotism on such a grand scale as in this Bush administration and Scalia is part of that, as is everyone involved with Bush. This government has Top and Bottom feeders everywhere one looks.

And, what do we get for leadership out of our Democratic Congress? Bush Buss Boys!
I have said it over and over again, these people have no passion about their Party affiliation. They have no direction and they couldn't lead a blind donkey to an oasis in the desert if the donkey was already wading in it. They would somehow find a way to drain the pool.

These Representatives such as Reid, who are enablers for the Republicans and their agenda that defies the Democratic Party base . . . are causing the Democratic Party to become very anemic. They drain the lifeblood and energy out of the Party members . . . the real workers . . . the money. I feel that I am not alone when I say that people such as Reid give me the feeling of how really powerless I am to make changes in this government, when we, not only have to fight to preserve our freedoms from these Bush Republicans, but we have to also fight our own members in Congress . . . this makes our Party use up energy in useless ways by feeding on itself.

If we want to survive as a Party that represents Democratic values, then we have to drain the Democratic Party of these lifeless, light weights who insist on carrying the banner for Bush that enables Bush to keep waging his Class War against the American citizens in this Country and a war that will also kill our two party system of government, and it's pretty close to that now. How many stab wounds in the back does it take to kill the Democratic Party?

Just askin . . .

Thanks BuzzFlash,

Shirley Smith


Subject: Your outrageous failure to cover urgent issues of voting integrity (as sent to NY Times)

Dear 'newspaper of record,'

The USA is becoming a giant 'banana republic,' with voting integrity inferior to that of many 'third world' countries. Your failure seriously to cover this deplorable situation is outrageous! Why do you cover vote fraud in the Ukraine, but not in the USA???

Please cover the current Ohio vote inquiry initiated by John Conyers and other Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee. Why haven't you yet covered these important proceedings???

Further, I ask that you cover ongoing recount efforts in Ohio, and elsewhere. Our citizenry must learn why election reform is an urgent priority for maintenance of our democracy.

Respectfully,

Ron Rattner, retired attorney
San Francisco, CA

Subject: a response to Barb in Athens GA + another suggestion

Barb in Athens, GA says:

Here's my idea: Why not turn ALL of the inaugural events into costume parties? Attendees would buy -- in lieu of cash donations -- and wear full body armor to the dinners, lunches, and balls. (Of course, no one would be caught dead wearing the same armor twice, so multiple outfits would be purchased.) When the festivities ended, the armor would be shipped -- presumably even THIS administration would foot the shipping bill -- to Iraq and distributed to our troops. The faithful elite would have a blast pretending to be authentic military personnel (isn't that what key members of this administration do all the time anyway?), and maybe our military personnel wouldn't have to dumpster dive for scrap metal to protect themselves. Just a thought. 

Dear Blue soul in Red state: how about building up on your idea. While you say: "When the festivities ended, the armor would be shipped..."

Why stop there? Why just armor? What about contents?

If you don’t mind, I will develop your concept a bit.

When the festivities end, gather all the armor-wearing folks, and ship the lot to Iraq, armor and all, to fight the war they enjoy and profit from so much. At the same time, bring our children home from Iraq, sans the homemade armor they had to procure for themselves and the weapons they had there. The armored elite will be much better off if they have something to keep their hands occupied, like some guns, perhaps a few vehicles, a bazooka or two. It should not take them 3 days to lay the weapons down and beg for mercy.

Of course they should not be allowed to come back home BEFORE they rebuild Iraq with their bare hands.

And while they are busy toiling to improve Iraq, Bush should visit them with a plastic turkey, on a community service assignment. He also should pay for the turkey and the trip out of his own pocket.

While nobody will take the above seriously, this is an entertaining idea, and a good one. From one Blue Soul in Red state to another. Happy Solstice.

Malgoska


Dear New York Times:

Please start paying attention to the election fraud story in the U.S. as well as the Ukraine.

It IS a story.  Check out computer security expert Chuck Herrin's web site, 

http://www.chuckherrin.com/hackthevote.htm

for instructions on how to download Diebold's election software and hack the mickey mouse Microsoft Access database which underlies it.  Florida 2000 proves that the Republicans have no qualms about stealing an election.  This proves they had the easy opportunity. 

No other plausible explanation not involving convoluted stretches of logic has been proposed for the extremely improbable election poll discrepancies in 10 of 11 swing states observed by Dr. Steven F. Freeman of U. Penn.

http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/04/11/Expldiscrpv00oPt1.pdf

Both Diebold president's Walden O'Dell and his brother who heads "competitor" ES&S are major Bush backers, and at least five people involved with the management and development of Diebold's systems are convicted felons, including Senior Vice President Jeff Dean, convicted of 23 counts of felony Theft in the First Degree, felonies involving a high degree of sophistication in the alteration of records in a computerized accounting system.

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/301469.shtml

Why has Diebold hired this man to oversee software development?

Cover this story.  Do your job!

(And I haven't even mentioned Ohio.)

"So now we have someone who's admitted that he's been blackmailed over killing someone, who pleaded guilty to 23 counts of embezzlement, who is given the position of senior programmer of the (Diebold) GEMS central tabulator system that counts approximately 50 percent of the votes in the (Bush-Kerry) election, in 30 states, both paper ballot and touch screen."

Michael Bein
Chelsea, Quebec
Canada


Subject: Alabama values

Is it just me or does this Guardian Unlimited | Arts features | 'We have to protect people' bear a striking resemblance to this Plot Summary for Porky's II: The Next Day (1983)??

Jason
Birmingham, AL

Subject: forwarded from http://www.theangryliberal.blogspot.com/

Sunday, December 12, 2004

The papers report today that the U.S. has been listening in on phone conversations between Mohammed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and Iranian officials. The NSA (responsible for collecting and decoding electronic communications for the U.S. government) is cited in the stories.

It brings to mind a "60 Minutes" story I saw a few years ago, profiling this very secretive arm of intelligence. I recall the NSA having the resources to tap nearly all forms of communication (voice, email, etc.) and target word phrases (i.e. they could encode certain words or phrases to set off alerts). My question: during the lead up to 9-11, are we to believe that the NSA saw NOTHING suspicious in this regard? Nothing set off alarms with regards to troubling phrases in all of the forms of communication they track? In the post 9-11 investigation(s), I don't recall the NSA ever being mentioned, anywhere -- why not?

Anyone?

IAEA Leader's Phone Tapped (Washington Post)

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Re: Hypocrite of the Week: Harry Reid

Sirs,

I/we/you knew this man from a reactionary red state, in order to survive politically supposedly over these years, would take this tack or direction. Daschle hung on until he got hung out to dry and lost. This Reid critter will be targeted ad infinitum and disappear in due course. Does he really think that at the appropriate election cycle the Repugnants care that he supported Nino and such ilk, and not try to swat him like a bug? Be used, fool, and be gone!

My intent was to ask for an email or fax address to swamp this leader-designate and other DEMwitted (lovely phrase) with our feelings about issues, in particular, that grotesque 'brethren," oh so faux church-rights supremee's aim to be promoted.

Grateful Reader


Subject: Is there such a thing as Good? or is it all "Us vs Them"?

Like philosophers, I am asking is there such a thing as Good? If someone lies, is that bad, or only if they get caught? If someone lies, and gets caught, is it ok if they maintain that the other party is just "partisan"? It's Us vs Them, and if any of Them point out a lie, then we can ignore it? Or is there some kind of over-arching Good?

If the Emperor has no clothes, but no one mentions it, is he still naked?

As an admirer of Christ, I always believed in a Good, that is above individual opinion. There IS a reality. Some of His basic tenets still stick with me:

- feed the poor -- in Texas, Gov Bush did not recognize that there were any hungry people. So, of course, he did not feed them.

- blessed are the peacemakers -- President Bush launched an optional war, and has killed probably 100,000 Iraqis. But since he did it in the name of "peace," it is a noble thing.

- the meek shall inherit the Earth -- President Bush and the Republican party in general, are not known for being meek. They are widely viewed by others as arrogant, but that is just "Them" speaking. Limbaugh, Coulter, O'Reilly are meek? <snort>

- turn the other cheek -- Vice President Cheney is now famous for saying "Go F*ck yourself." That is basically the attitude the Republicans have.

- love your enemies -- for Bush, it is Us vs Them, and he plans on killing Them. Harpies like Ann Coulter want to just kill them all.

- what you do to the least of them, you do to Me -- if Christ really DOES exist, then Bush may be in for a little trouble.

What I am forced to conclude, is that President Bush is the opposite of what Christ was teaching. In Bush's small minded approach, there is no independent Good. It is ok to lie, if you don't get caught. And if you DO get caught, just claim it is a partisan attack. He has no sense of duty to any higher Power; no sense of common decency. It is all "Me vs Them" to him.

Bill Peterson
(a child of West Texas from the 1950's, grew up in Odessa, 20 miles from Midland)


Subject: Nobody Could Have Predicted...THE SALT PETER PRINCIPLE

The Peter Principle was first introduced by L. Peter in a humoristic book describing the pitfalls of bureaucratic organization. The original principle states that in a hierarchically structured administration, people tend to be promoted up to their "level of incompetence."

This priniciple suggests that once that level of incompetence is reached, the people will not be promoted further, but will instead remain at the level of incompetence.

So along comes the Bush Administration. Incompetence is not only promoted to the level of incompetence, it is further rewarded with more promotions. I would like to dub this process as the "Salt Peter Principle." Incompetence to the point of impotence, if you get my drift. People will continue to rise (may be inappropriate verb) up the hierarchy as long as they are loyal and can lie straight faced when confronted with an uncomfortable reality. If ever there was an example of this, it has to be Condoleezza Rice, the worst NSA ever, but a damn good liar and workout partner.

Posted by Turk to Nobody Could Have Predicted...


Subject: Howard Dean for DNC chair!

HOWARD DEAN GETS IT

I urge everyone who has a voice to support the candidacy of Howard Dean for DNC Chair. Howard Dean gets it. I know I don't have to preach to the choir of Deaniacs; I want to reach out to everyone else in all corners of the Democratic Party and ask you to support, in any way you can, Howard Dean for DNC Chair. In a city where people take themselves too seriously, Dean is a refreshingly clear thinker who can have self-deprecating fun.
Dean's presidential candidacy made history. It was a monumental grass-roots mobilization that was strategically brilliant, energetic and effective, and so became the model for campaigns by other candidates. His internet volunteerism and fundraising were off the charts. By using the Dean model, Democrats matched Republican corporate donors during this very surprising presidential election cycle. Yet Dean also understands that you need more than money to win elections.

He understands that the party must empower the base, and believes that all must be included in that base. He sees the party's pro-life contingent as an asset, understanding that its members revere life at all its stages-not only before birth, which is partly why they have not left the party. He embraces the need for a reframing of the choice issue so that we don't fall prey to its demagoguing, which is an idolatrous perversion of the Gospel. He can engage in a new dialogue that will enable real compassionate solutions to such problems. He is not one to wedgify the issues, which only deepens national antipathies instead of building bridges that will make America stronger.

As the Governor of Vermont, he was committed to-and delivered-universal health care coverage for every child. In Vermont today, as a result of his efforts, every person under 18 has access to health insurance. Dean also understands that we cannot run a country on runaway reality-bending deficits. He understands the economics of health care. He understands the needs of working professional women, as his wife is a working physician. He understands the seriousness of the health impact of the environmental default inattention threatening the country and the world.

Howard Dean is a straight talking, straight shooting, tell it like it is guy. He is smart. He is principled. He is effective. I like him.

Cynthia Butler
Washington, DC