December 9, 2004

The BuzzFlash Mailbag

The opinions expressed in the Mailbag are not necessarily those of BuzzFlash. Read the BuzzFlash FAQ for info on submitting to the Mailbag.


Subject: Rumsfeld vs. reality

Dear Buzz,

A quote of the year from Rumsfeld, a man who has never faced combat himself, but has the gall to remind our soldiers, complaining to him about lack of protective armor, that...

"You can have all the armor in the world on a tank and it can (still) be blown up," Rumsfeld said.

Disgruntled Troops Complain to Rumsfeld (AP/Yahoo)

Spoken like a true armchair warrior.

When is he going to be fired? When are our soldiers coming home?

Elizabeth


THE HEADLINE WE SHOULD SEE...

Rumsfeld Faces Tough Questions from Press Corp

THE HEADLINE WE DO SEE...

Rumsfeld Faces Tough Questions from Troops (AP/CNN)

Turk


Subject: the charlie rose show pbs

i have a favour to ask, can someone please obtain the transcript of the Charlie Rose show that took place on Dec 7 / 2004, with an interview with LEE RAYMOND, Chairman & CEO, Exxon Mobil Corporation

i caught some of it, and the way i heard it, everything, according to Raymond, that is happening now on this planet is about oil and gas, all the wars, everything, but you should read the transcripts, after what i heard, this guy Raymond basically says it's about survival, and he and those like him will do anything to get the oil in any part of the world, whether one gives consent or not, it is a scary interview...a must, it sums up everything that the US is about and its real goals

thanks for reading this............

jesse


Subject: More evidence of vote fraud

On election morning, the Bush margin of victory was about 3.56 million votes. Well it's shrinking down to 3 million - a shift to Kerry of nearly 600,000 votes. In '00 Gore gained about 300,000 additional votes to his margin from Election Day after all the votes were cast and certified. Absentee Ballots continue to be counted around the US. Who knows how many Kerry votes will come crashing down from the sky?

I believe we are seeing this fairly significant "readjustment" to Kerry because Board of Election officials around the country fear that an audit of their results might be in the offing. Why not head them off at the pass by "readjusting" their books to reflect reality rather than this alleged Bushmania which struck the country on 2 November?

Anomalous results usually indicate vote fraud. Cleaned up results may keep them out of jail. They prefer life outside bars over George W. Bush. Most BOE officials are standing pat-and sweating it out-while others are in full panic mode.

Brad F.


Subject: Bush's new jacket creeps me out!

There is something about Bush's new faux-military "outfit" that makes my skin crawl.

Joe W.

[BuzzFlash Note: Maybe it's because the American way is to have civilian control at the top of the military chain of command. Or is it because, in this jacket, our Commander in Chief resembles Buffalo Bob of the Howdy Doody Show?


Subject: question about muzak at Wal-Mart

I want to thank you, first of all, for your great web page. I read it every day and spread the word as much as I can. I am hoping you can help point me in the right direction.

Yesterday, I had to call our local Wal-Mart regarding an account issue, and of course was not really surprised when I was switched from one person to the other and put on hold for extended periods of time.

While I was on hold for the last 11 minutes, I was surprised to hear that the hold music that was being pumped into my ear was Christian music. I am not kidding. I don't know the name of any of the songs, but one in particular that really "got my goat" was one where the guy was singing about how our nation, the good ole USA, was in such trouble because we had turned away from God. Can you believe that?

It has been on my mind since last night, as I was wondering who chooses the music that you are forced to hear when you've called Wal-Mart and are put on hold, so I called the front desk and asked them. The lady said unless she was mistaken, the content of what you heard while on hold was chosen by Wal-Mart's main office, which she believed to be Missouri, and she also is under the impression that that same content is played at all of the Wal-Marts in the USA.

I am wondering, first of all, if that is true, and am hoping that whoever answers this email will call their local Wal-Mart and try to be put on hold for something, to find out. And if it IS true, is this even legal? How can I find out? I think if you could somehow choose to at least turn it off that it may be, but of course that isn't the case.

I hope this email finds you well.

Bright Blessings,

Lisa Carroll
North Bend, OR


Subject: Campaign to spend inauguration money on service people

Hi,

I just sent this email to the Mr Bush and I am wondering about the idea of trying to shame them (a joke) into canceling the inaugural ceremonies.

Subject: Humvees and Balls

I heard Mr. Rumsfeld's elitist remarks today concerning the armor or lack thereof, to protect our children in your war. I think a person who cares would consider their protection first and foremost especially since none of you have any first hand experience in a war. How much did I hear the taxpayers are spending on your inauguration and the fancy dress balls? I would love to see that postponed as long as we are mired in this war, and the money better spent to take care of our servicemen and women. This would be the fair and proper thing to do in this emergency. Like any other family, the government must pay their bills before they play.

The address is Whitehouse.gov and I copied to one of my senators, Hardball and Russert. I want them to at least know their opposition is still out here and we will never give up the fight for what is right.

Suellen


Subject: How Would Rummy or Bush Know? . . .

BuzzFlash,

Regarding CNN.com and your article Rumsfeld faces tough questions from troops . . .

It is hard to read this stuff without just becoming so pissed off . . . it is my understanding that Rummy has never had to be in any type of combat and yet, his cavalier answers. Well, Rummy, it was you and the Bush administration who decided to attack an unarmed country, knowing we didn't even have the equipment for an "invasion."

Is there anyone in the Bush administration who has the background for their job? Anyone?

Promoting because of loyalty is one thing, but when it kills people, is quite another thing, and since we have to provide such ungodly protection for our illustrious leader (cough), then I think if they make such outlandish and dangerous decisions for Americans and put American lives in danger and not their own, then those Americans should have the same protection that Bush is so inclined to give himself. I mean, really, who is in the most danger here . . . our soldiers, or Bush?

The Bastard.

Thanks BuzzFlash,

Shirley Smith


Subject: Bush Masthead Photo

On that Bush-in-uniform photo on your masthead--maybe I'm crazy, but it looks like on his chest it says, "George W. Bush/Commander In Chief."  How insecure is that? He needs a Commander In Chief UNIFORM? Most wartime presidents were PROUD to wear civilian clothes to highlight that the military was under civilian control at all times. Who does
he think he is, frigging CASTRO?

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Every Dictator's Dream . . . uh, Becomes a Nightmare . . .

BuzzFlash,

Regarding your article sent in by a blogger on Americablog: Because a great nation deserves the truth

I couldn't agree with him more, yes it is great because when there is no justice in the world, even a little justice here and there can give one hope . . . and it would seem that Bush and his administration are becoming victims of their own propaganda . . .

These actions are very telling in their own way. Bush and his cabal know they are hated and what they don't know is by whom. They know everything they have done has been against the majority of people in the US and around the world. They know this, and that is one reason why their paranoia will only grow to giant proportions and we are already seeing such results in Bush's behavior and his protection blankets he wears every day and night. In fact, when we heard questions raised about why no threats to our food chain, well, Bush couldn't care less, with seven people used as tasters. What a job. How useless could one feel by one's boss . . . I wonder how many people lined up for that job or does he use family members? What are the benefits of such a job?

And, I don't care except that we taxpayers are paying for his asininity. We didn't cause him to be hated. He did it on his own. And, if there is any success story to the Bush administration, it would be that . . . he has done the best job in the shortest amount of time of being the most hated Pseudo President in the US history. I have visions of him ending up like Hitler, in a room with just a few people, because he can't trust anyone and wondering who or when they were going to come and get him. But, unlike Hitler, I envision Bush on his knees crying and begging for forgiveness because God made him do it and promising that he won't do it anymore . . . if we would just tell him what he did wrong.

Bush and his administration are carriers of the disease of "the fear of terrorism." They breed fear into people who have a low resistance to the Bush administration and fall as victims of this fear that drives people to make decisions that under normal circumstances, they would not make, i.e., such as believing the duct tape advice by this reckless regime, and their decisions to vote for Bush or any Republican.

The terrorists are winning the mind game, at least with Bush and his Gestapo. Mental abuse and programming are far more effective than physical abuse, unless a person gets killed in an attack, of course, or if the abuse is just for the enjoyment of abuse itself and used on innocent people in Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib. The terrorists can just sit back and watch the Bush administration do a much better job than they (the terrorists) can do by constantly terrorizing US citizens because of their own paranoia. I can understand their paranoia, if I were anything close to what these monsters are, I would be scared of my own shadows, too, because when a person is a criminal or dishonest . . . they can't be trusted . . . so it is no wonder that the Bush administration does not trust anyone . . . even their most loyal Geheime Staatspolizei.

We will know when the Bush administration reaches the "breaking point," because they will start living underground or in caves in the mountains (how ironic) . . . of course, does it count if Cheney already lives underground . . . I remember all those miniature explosions over three years ago and now Bush with his water palace . . .

Who wants to bet that Bush will have helicopters or planes circling constantly above his floating boat and it will also be surrounded by small boats, and then there will probably be hundreds of divers with their underwater detection equipment swimming around the boat, not counting all of the nets to make sure that no angry whale gets close or those horrible electric eels, they can be dangerous, and those porpoises, well, they just pretend to be friendly, one can never tell what dangers lurk in the shadows of the deep . . .

Maybe the Bush administration has reached the breaking point already, or do they know something that maybe they just forgot to tell the rest of us? Hmmm . . . I wonder how much caves are going for these days?

Just wonderin . . .

Thanks BuzzFlash,

Shirley Smith


Subject: 60 minutes

for the first time in several years, I decided to watch 60 minutes...what i observed in the first 10 minutes made me physically ill...some jerk interviewing awol soldiers in canada...he was saying 'but u signed a contract'...so did our sanctimonious resident in washington d.c....where is the outcry from these broadcasters (not)...where is the outcry for all the innocent iraqis being slaughtered...I am so ashamed of this country I would leave if I were a young person but I am not...my heart aches for all the injustices being heaped on us all

suzy in tucson


Subject: mailbag 12/8/04 (Judy Walsh)

Judy Walsh....I too, refuse to lie down with the dogs...never, never, never, never!! I am sick of the dogs...I have had it with the dogs...unfortunately, I have to live in a world
with the dogs...but, I still refuse to lie down with them.

Most times.....I just mope....but, each day I read a good article on BuzzFlash, and I think
hopefully...I will still be here in 2008, and Howard Dean still is the smartest man alive (dem.) so, we can always hope! Even Democrats say...ignorantly....Howard is not Presidential material....how in the hell does one know...he never had a chance....between the 'suck up' dems, and the right wing media....they did the Dogs' job for them...and they knew that!

Howard Dean would never lie down with the Dogs!!!

I get a smug satisfaction when someone gets to Don Rumsfeld, like today...or something
happens like the lies regarding Pat Tillman (God rest his soul) and bless Jessica Lynch
for living and telling us the truth...those things make me realize that I am not just
imagining all this!

Thank you Buzz...for telling the truth and giving us a place to vent. And a special thanks to JUDY WALSH!

Shirley St. Louis


Subject: President dress-up

Oh my God, now there's absolutely no doubt about it; Bush's favorite part of being pResident, next to starting wars, is that he gets to play dress-up. I didn't know whether to laugh or cry when I saw him in that ridiculous jacket at Camp Pendleton. What a freaking joke our thieving leader is. That is, it's a joke until you remember history's past tyrants who also loved to dress up in snappy uniforms. Then it seems rather ominous.

Rumsfeld was so disgusting with the troops today. What an arrogant bastard. Of course, that's why he fits in so well with this administration. He and all the other chicken-hawks should be fired, or at the very least, they should be shipped out to an Iraqi combat zone, some hot-spot like Fallujah, and let them experience first hand what our battle weary soldiers are going through. Let's see how they'd like to try to fight a war when they're ill equipped, poorly trained, ill informed and under appreciated. It's such a disgrace the way this administration treats our military. They're nothing but cannon fodder to them.

They better watch it though. Even the most casual observer had to pick up on the tension with the soldiers at the briefing today. If the military turns on Bush and his criminal cohorts, that'll put an end to their dreams of global imperialism. By the way, does anyone know what the military vote was? I never heard anything although I can't help wondering why anyone in uniform could possibly vote for pResident Dress-up.

Judy Maclean
Colorado

[BuzzFlash Note: We thought they would've learned from the "Mission Accomplished" flight suit costume. Maybe we should create paper-doll outfits for Bush to try on, like cowboy, fireman, etc.?]


Subject: something to think about

Recent news reports suggest that the United States is on the leading edge of a homeless veteran's surge that may rival the post-Vietnam era. Similar news stories have reported wholesale warehousing of wounded soldiers absent conscious medical care.

Still more media coverage reveals backdoor draft of previously discharge military personnel. Even some special ops personnel from the Vietnam days are looking at Iraq as a deja vu all over again quagmire.

The original Russian Revolution of 1917 began as a soldiers' revolt. Until crushed, the old Wobblies (Industrial Workers of the World) unionist movement sowed seeds of discontent among potential American troops during World War I. Nineteenth century European history is replete with various military mutinies.

Thus, the question arises as to whether the disruptions caused by the *war* in Iraq, when combined with a faltering economy and political corruption at home, might lead to rebellion from within the ranks in 21st century America.

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: good thing

also, i want to know where is the outrage by the public as to the lies they have been told--what is happening to our military and innocent iraquis? who are we fighting and why? what is the definition of insurgent? what is happening to the mentally ill and old and sick and children in iraq? it drives me nuts.

http://www.freepress.net/tools/order.php

karin dicker


Subject: Spooky

Remember how we used to scoff in disdain over the 'state-run' media in the USSR.  Well, Russians are reverting back to what they used to be (if they ever really did change) and the good old USA is becoming more and more like the former 'evil empire'. Doesn't this sound as if it could happen here?

Russian TV Journalist Suspended for On-Air Sarcasm (Reuters//Yahoo)

MOSCOW (Reuters) - A leading Russian television presenter was suspended on Wednesday from the NTV channel's flagship news program after making sarcastic comments on air about the sacking of a journalist.

The suspension of Alexei Pivovarov will raise fresh fears of press censorship in Russia after the sacking earlier this year of journalist Leonid Parfyonov for publicly objecting to his NTV managers' role in editorial decisions.

Pivovarov anchored the evening news show Strana i Mir created by Parfyonov.

A BuzzFlash Reader



Subject: My Note to the DNC

Dear BuzzFlash,

After several columns about powers that be in the Democratic party continuing to insist that we need to shift ever further to the right, I decided to send them the note copied below:

The Democratic party CANNOT shift further to the "center." That's in quotes because, guided by the DLC, this party seems right of center already on some issues.

We stand for equality of people, with all citizens above corporate power; we fight for civil liberties and basic Constitutional freedoms, even for unpopular views; we know that "privatization" and "deregulation" are code words for shifting wealth further from hard-working Americans to those already blessed with much material comfort.

We have MORALITY on OUR side because we're disgusted by poverty, discrimination, job loss and the death of women in back alley abortions.

We should shout these beliefs from mountaintops, not bury them under acquiescent protestations of the need to get along. Republican pols and pundits call us traitors and terrorists. Why on earth should we open our arms to them? Or deal with them on their terms?

If the DNC leadership continues to insist that the party needs to be more like the Republicans, it will be demoralizing at the base and the polls.

Choose leadership that reflects what we really are and what we know this country can be.

Sincerely,

Cathy Vance


Subject: What's this crap???!

What's this crap about we had to go to war with the army we've got? Hell, it's been Bush and Rumsfeld's army for four years! I want to know why, if we can buy things like flak jackets to send to our family member in Iraq...why the hell can't the army get them?

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: The Silence of the Lambs

There comes a time in every wedding ceremony where the pastor gets to the part where he looks at the audience of friends and relatives gathered before him and says, "If anyone knows why these two should not be joined in holy matrimony speak now or forever hold your peace." Well that's exactly where we are right now in the history of this country. We must speak up now or forever hold our peace. Some people refer to it as the tipping point. Or the point of no return. Whatever you wish to call it, it is upon us.

It is the place in time where those in power are so encouraged by the lack of resistance to their lies and corruption that they feel there will be no consequences to more and more overt acting out of their schemes.

Much like a child who pushes its parents to see how far it can go, our government has been trying for the last four years to see just how much it can get away with. And the answer so far has been relative silence. It's amazing just how far we have let things go when one outrage after another has piled up around us. The stolen election of 2000. The lies of this administration to get us into a war in Iraq. The totally inept waging of that war. The turning of a huge surplus into the mother of all deficits. The deliberate rolling back of environmental standards and ignoring of the solid global warming science. The trade deficit and the devaluation of the dollar which threaten the global economy. Iraq Prison scandals, the failure to get Osama, distracting from the war on terror with the bogus Iraq war, And the steady chipping away at our civil liberties... I could go and on.

And, look, I know it's part of the problem. When confronted with a mess of epic proportions the natural tendency is to run and hide. Just pretend it's okay and go on with your life. Maybe someone else will clean it up. But we all know that if we do that eventually things get so out of hand it becomes a crisis. I hate to say it but we have arrived at that point.

This administration has stolen another election through voter suppression and fraud. You don't want to admit it or believe it, but it's true. You know in your gut there could not be a majority of americans who observed the wreckage piled around them and said "YES GIVE ME FOUR MORE YEARS OF THIS"! There is more than enough evidence out there to convince your average american if they only looked for it. But you don't want to see.

Yes the Major Media outlets are controlled by the corporations and they are not telling us about it. But if you are at BuzzFlash reading this, you already know how to find the info.

Why are we silent? Why are we not in the streets raising our voices? After 2000 when they told us we were crazy and stopped the vote count and it turned out when all the votes WERE counted, Gore won, do we not have the right to raise bloody hell at the merest hint of such tactics again? I understand your fear. These people are ruthless. But that fear is also telling you this threat to our way of life is real.

People who would rule through fear are the opposite of what this democracy is all about. That is the way of dictators and facists. So this is it folks. Four more years of this and America will be an entirely different place just as it is now from where we were four years ago. Let them steal the will of the people yet again and there will be nothing left of our democracy. We didn't ask for this nor do we want to face it. But it is here none the less. It's up to you and I to raise our voices and let them know this cannot be tolerated.

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Rummy gets an earful from the troops!

I heard part of the Rumsfeld dog and pony show on CNN this morning, and was stunned by Rumsfeld's "answers" - quite frankly I have a hard time understanding why this man has not been sent either to prison, or the funny farm!

When asked why - after almost 2 years of war - so many vehicles in Iraq still lack sufficient armor to protect our troops, the best he could say was "You can have all the armor in the world on a tank and it can (still) be blown up." Who did this man study military management under, Robert MacNamara?

He said that we are working as hard as possible to produce the 6,000 plus armored humvees (and bolt on armor kits) needed now in Iraq - at the astounding rate of 400 per month.

400?

What happened to the nation that produced thousands of liberty ships in a matter of months during the 1940's, while also producing thousands of B-29's in those same months? Is our industry so weak it can no longer function to meet the demand for vehicles - are they so badly hampered by outsourcing that we can no longer produce enough vehicles in TWO YEARS?

Man, this just boggles the mind - that the nation that can put out millions of cars and trucks for the paying public cannot find the capability to produce more than 400 vehicles every month that could save lives.

Perhaps, just perhaps, the administration needs to consider additional emergency contracts to manufacture the needed vehicles - even if this does upset some of Bush's friends in those companies currently struggling to keep up with demand.

Stephen


Subject: Greetings from the White House

December 8, 2004

How was your Pearl Harbor Day?

Happy Holidays!!!! The House passed the Intelligence Bill so Bush can go ahead and put Goss in charge since he has been extraordinarily successful at getting rid of most of the guys at the CIA who told Bush the truth, which he proceeded to ignore.

Two ladies from the 9/11 group were on the Today Show and said they would have liked to have had something in the bill about people who funneled money to terrorists. Surprisingly there was no mention of there being disappointment that bin Laden is still out there which brings me to…

Seasons Greetings!!!! to the USA and Afghanistan from the Cheneys. Hamid Karzai was inaugurated president of Afghanistan. Cheney has declared that Afghanistan is now free. Presumably they are free because they had a controversial election, but succeeded in electing Bush’s chosen one. Let me predict now that Allawi will be elected in Iraq, even if Bush has to wipe out every Sunni in the country.

Gucci Fashion House has come out in favor of Karzai and they need a fashion plate. Bin Laden is much too ethnic. Karzai’s sense of fashion will only get better when the oil pipeline is secure. Happy Birthday, on Christmas Eve, Mr. Karzai. What happens if Karzai decides to speak up for the Afghanis and tell Bush to get the hell out of Kabul? Ask Mr. Aristide in Haiti or Chalabi in Iraq, what happens when our puppets try to cut the strings?

Deck the halls with regime changes. I know Bush campaigned against nation building and regime change and that wasn’t a mistake (he doesn’t make any), but he has changed his mind. We did it in Haiti, we supposedly did it in Afghanistan, we probably will get Allawi in Iraq, but Venezuela didn’t cooperate. We just need to shock a little awe into those people, but how? We can’t just go bomb the crap out of them, can we? Hell yes!

They won’t be home for Christmas, you can bet on that. Bush went to Camp Pendleton in a strange, but stylish, Star Trek meets GI Joe jacket. I noticed that not all soldiers in the usual photo-op choir loft were cheering or clapping. He won’t be in Iraq because those Marines are armed.

"In the battle for Fallujah, the terrorists hid weapons in a cemetery, they hid ammunition in private homes, they hid bombs in mosques," the president told the cheering crowd of Marines and family members. "But they could not hide from the United States Marines."

And you bombed cemeteries, private homes and mosques and how many civilians, who couldn’t afford to leave the city, did you slaughter, Mr. Bush? You can’t tell us because then the US citizenry will know why the Iraqis don’t want us there.

Rummy was with Cheney in Afghanistan, but he ran into a GI with an actual question about sending soldiers to Iraqi junkyards to search for armor for their vehicles. Searching for something appropriate to say, since his boss had said the soldiers are sent with everything they need because we take care of our troops, was a no-win situation. Most of the Humvees are as well armored as the one belonging to Governor Schwarts-his-fart and he does occasionally run into people who hate his administration almost as much as they hate hearing him say things like, "I'll be back, girlie boys."

I can’t seem to find Rummy’s actual quote for some unknown reason, but I heard it on the Today Show and it went something like, "sometimes you have to go with what you have and not what you might want." You would think the guy had asked for accommodations at the Holiday Inn. They want Kevlar vests, they want armored vehicles, they want to live to get their college benefits, they want an actual reason to be there, they want what you and Bush promise, you pompous turd. You said the best.

They went to war without preparation because we had to get there before they debunked all the reasons for the war. They want the best and you gave it in tax cuts to the people with the highest incomes. Maybe Bush will dress like Santa and take vests and armor to the troops for Christmas. Nah, he will be at the ranch, safe and secure, with his girls while yours are dying.

Peace on Earth? Not a chance, but there is another Christmas decoration controversy. We had a manger scene stolen in OKC and the owner hopes they learn about Jesus from it. Madame Trousseau's in England is being accused of being offensive in their treatment of the same. They have not chosen wisely.

Tony Blair, Prince Phillip and Dubya as the wisemen, is good and sarcastic. I have no idea why they put poor silent Phil in there, but Tony and Dubya are quite amusing. Bringing completely useless baby gifts is very Bush-like, except for the gold, but Bush would have given that to the guy who told them where to find God’s other chosen one. Jesus would have been given no health care. They could have had Scalia, Thomas and Rehnquist. One wiseman is always depicted as black.

I have never heard of the people portraying Mary and Joseph, but they could have used either of Bush's "virginal" type daughters and maybe Clay Aiken or Jebby Bush. They seem to be more upset about Samuel L. Jackson and Hugh Grant as the lowly shepherds.

There was a priest asking why be so offensive. Which is more offensive, recasting the nativity or using Jesus and God to wage a completely unjustifiable war for fun and profit? Portraying George W. Bush as God’s man, the savior of the world, when he takes from the poor to give to the rich and the only jobs he creates involve getting kids shot at, is as offensive as it gets.

All of you "Young Republicans" and "College Republicans" give George W. Bush a really good Christmas present and dig out your patriotism and sign up. There should be NO young or college Republicans on campus to protest anything, they should be fighting THEIR war in Iraq. The next one who tries to convince me that Bush is God's man for us is going to get a snoot full.

Karen Webb
Moore, Ok.


Subject: Take a minute or two

Here's the link to contact the Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee. Send them a brief note to express your feelings on the rigged election.

http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/contact.html

Here's the one I sent:

Free and fair elections are the bedrock on which democracy rests. Failure on elected officials to ensure free and fair elections will lead to chaos and civil breakdown. If you fail to address the most recent shortcomings, we the people will have been robbed of our franchise. This may have worked for Caligula, but the Romans didn't have the Internet. Our future as a democracy depends on your actions today. No retreat, no surrender. We will not go quietly into that dark night. The p-Resident and his gangster cohorts in Congress must be exposed. These guys make the Corleones look like Walt Disney.

Barry Sussman


Subject: Check out Kerik made millions from agency contractor (AP/MSNBC)

Isn't this a MAJOR conflict of interest...or with the BUSHEVIKS...BUSINESS AS USUAL?!?

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Back to the past!

All across the country we have read reports about unreliable electronic and optical scan voting.

We all should insist on going back to the old fashioned manner of voting....no punch cards...no optical scans...nothing but the real thing. Yes, a paper ballot with boxes next to a candidate’s name. Just like the Canadians, you mark an X in the box next to your candidate’s name. And Canadians can attest to the smoothness of their elections. I can just hear the republicans howling their objections...we won’t get national results for 2-3 days after poll workers hand count the ballots! We will have to hire more poll workers! I say to the howlers, "Better late than incorrect. Better to hire extras...human error is a lot easier to uncover."

We should be yelling back, "SO WHAT, if we don’t get the total national votes for 2-3 days. What’s the big hurry?" And if it takes more poll workers to guarantee the correct count, then so be it! Our votes should never be compromised by those who insist on instant vote results and half-assed, cheap and manipulated elections.

Cathy


Subject: Jonathan Greenberg Interview--BEST EVER

I must tell you that, as a political historian, the interview is the best I have read which means 200,000 pages, or more, copied plus many books since Bush came into power.

This interview should be circulated through the internet and major press. I have not read his book but will start tonight.

What has distressed me is the absence of study on PNAC and ATR whose policies are exactly what Bush is proposing and some he has implemented. Is not Bush a TOOL of those two groups?

BuzzFlash is a great site. I never miss a day on it and copy much of your information.

OK! Why not support us? I will. I have been remiss and my only rationale is that I visit so many I cannot afford to support all of them. You are SPECIAL.

clarence swinney
-political historian-
burlington nc


"At a well-attended Christmas party where Vice President Cheney stood sipping white wine a few feet away, Snow explained he was at the White House for the regular weekly economic lunch when Andy Card appeared and ushered him into the Oval Office. President Bush asked Snow to remain on the job and Snow agreed. Was he surprised? 'I'm not going to say anything more,' but his expression confirmed it."

Oh, great. Cheney, who is not only bat-shit crazy but has a history of multiple DUIs, is still drinking. God help us all.

Rosamond


Subject: What they really need....

Let's see, 2.3 trillion or is it 3.2 trillion goes missing from the DOD (poof - gone, no investigation, just money down the ol' memory hole -- even BuzzFlash can't jog people's memory now and then) and the military can't get decent equipment?????? How many new billionaires were made with that missing moola? (And what else do you think it got spent on?????) But what those troops really need is to get home and stop dying for, as Ted Rall so aptly puts it, George Bush's geopolitical aims.

In the long run, like so much of the planned chaos, it's just another way to get more money sent their way and to get the draft reinstated. Fighting for America has absolutely nothing to do with Iraq.

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: Conyer's hearing on ohio vote fraud coverage...Please pass this on

Pacifica broadcast the entire John Conyers hearing on Ohio Vote Fraud Coverage on Dec. 8, 2004, but not the mainstream media. No Republicans attended the forum held by the Minority members of the House Judiciary Committee. Below are some reports.

John Conyers is trying to collect a couple million emails on the voting investigation. He has set up a special form for you to ask questions of the committee.

Please send off an email with a question for the Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee Hearing on the Ohio Vote.

Click below and take a moment to write your opinions of the 2004 Presidential vote.

http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/contact.html

Conyers Hearings on Ohio Vote Fraud Coverage (truthout)

From Selma to Ohio: A Report from the Conyers Hearing (truthout)

Hana G.


Subject: Neglected Coverage of 2004 Election Irregularities

On December 8, Rep. John Conyers hosted a congressional forum in which verifiable evidence of vote suppression and compelling indications of vote manipulation in Ohio were detailed by panels of witnesses. One witness who previously served as an international elections inspector recounted incidents in Ohio that would never have been permitted in El Salvador’s elections. Yet we ignore these disturbing reports from within our own borders?

C-SPAN and several radio stations carried the forum live. Concurrently, mainstream media covered stories such as Basketbrawl, Martha Stewart’s incarceration and Scott Peterson’s sentencing hearing. One day later, a search on CNN.com returns no hits regarding this forum and the only mention at MSNBC.com is on Keith Olbermann’s blog. ABC.com has a short story, but the headline does not appear on their home page.

I am baffled by the media silence and appalled by the republican absence in this critical moment in American democracy. This may well be the least partisan yet most important issue facing our nation today. We cease to function as a representative republic when we cannot guarantee that the will of the people has been upheld. I urge the media to begin full and prominent coverage of the investigations into the 2004 election and the process to reform our voting systems.

Link to watch the Conyers Forum online: http://www.c-span.org/
(click on House Forum on Ohio Election Voting Procedures (12/08/04):

Link to 113 under-reported election irregularities/potential fraud stories (11-2 to present): http://www.independentmediasource.com/election_art_1128_1204.htm

Tom McIntyre


Subject: Spoiled Ballots are overwhelmingly in favor of Kerry

A hand recount should be able to discern voter intent of at least 40%, as possibly as high as 60%, of the 92,000 uncounted ballots. They will break for Kerry in the range of 70% - 80%. Projected Net Kerry gain: 25,760 - 44,160. That would reduce Bush's margin down to as little as 63,000 or as high as 81,000.

That is why it is urgent that these vote counters be watched like a hawk.

UNCOUNTED VOTES IN HAMILTON COUNTY Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D. December 8, 2004 (northnet.org)

Challengers need to be present to raise objections if the crooks start throwing out Kerry votes - as they have no doubt been instructed to do by Uncle Tom Blackwell. Uncle Tom wants to be governor, then President.

Brad F.


Subject: The Associated Press is a whore

Hi Buzz,

Here is a "press release" I just sent to the Associated Press. They are really pissing me off lately.

Thanks - you guys rock.

Dear AP:

Here's a news flash: You people are whores for the crooks in power. I urge any honest people with journalistic integrity who work for the AP to quit and start news organizations that practice journalism.

The headline says

Poll: Fla. Voters Had No Voting Problems (AP/Yahoo)

and then a couple of paragraphs down in the article, it says:

... 95 percent of the Republicans quizzed said they were very or somewhat confident in the result, compared with only 58 percent of Democrats...

So nearly half of Democrat voters were less than "somewhat confident" that their vote was counted and the headline says the voters say there were "no problems." That is a case of the headline misrepresenting the content of the article.

And your article Jackson Vows to Continue Ohio Vote Probe (AP/Yahoo) says:

Many of the election complaints, such as disparities in vote totals and a shortage of voting machines in Democratic-leaning urban precincts, have already been cited and explained.

What on earth does that mean? Explained by whom? The co-chair of the Ohio Bush campaign? As it stands, the sentence suggests that Rev. Jackson and those investigating this election are wearing tinfoil hats. However, if you actually included the "explanation" you cite, it would make the investigators seem very sensible indeed.

This is not journalism. I see what you are doing. You are using the good name of the Associated Press to blind people to the fact that you are discrediting those that seek to preserve democracy in an attempt to further empower the counter-democratic coalition of which you are a part.

This will be the downfall of the Associated Press as a credible organization. If I was running Yahoo news, I wouldn't even bother printing the crap that you send out.

Thanks for nothing,

Peter Glasser


Subject: today's headline

BuzzFlash:

Today's headline on your website should have read:

RUMSFELD TELLS TROOPS TO TOUGH IT OUT, EVEN THOUGH YOU DON'T HAVE TANK ARMOR, BODY ARMOR, ENOUGH BULLETS, AND OTHER CRITICAL EQUIPMENT

A BuzzFlash Reader


Subject: A plan for fighting back

We can challenge their licenses, we can get institutional investors to question their officers, and we can boycott them and their sponsors.

UCC Challenges Miami Licenses (Broadcasting & Cable)

By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 12/9/2004 10:33:00 AM

The United Church of Christ has asked the FCC to yank the licenses of CBS' WFOR-TV and NBC's WTVJ-TV, both Miami, charging that they unreasonably refused to air a UCC ad and because they and their parent networks do not air enough programming reflecting "the full range of religious expression."

NBC says the ad violated its policy on controversial ads, though it has suggested changes that would pass muster. CBS says its station was never approached to run the ad in question.

In fact, neither station is being targeted for its own actions. The UCC ad buy was national, with the CBS and NBC networks not taking it due to standing policies. The two Florida stations were targeted because they are network owned and because their license renewals have come due and can be challenged up until Jan.2…

Carolyn Kay
MakeThemAccountable.com


Subject: Rumsfeld Poetry

Hi BuzzFlash,

A little Rummy poetry to lighten the day for U.S. troops.

(I didn't edit this...he actually made these statements. Only in America.)

Good luck Mr. Wilson.

The Poetry of Donald Rumsfeld

(in reply to Specialist Thomas Wilson question)

On War

You go to war with the army

you have

not the army

you might want

or wish to have

at a later time

That is the way

war

and insurgencies

and combat

operate

You go in

you have an enemy with a brain

that does things

and then you make adjustments

Does everything happen instantaneously

as the brain in the enemy

sees things and makes changes?

No.

it doesn't happen instantaneously


About Wilson

I don't know what the facts are

but somebody's certainly going to

sit down with him

and find out what he knows

that they may not know

and make sure he knows

what they know

that he may not know

and that's a good thing.

I think it's a very constructive exchange

by D. Rumsfeld

Andy Grainger
London Canada


Subject: Am I nuts?

Okay, I've heard the tape of O'Reilly saying "Christmas is a federal holiday to celebrate the philosopher Jesus" on Air America Radio twice today. I swear, each time I heard it, it sounded to me like he said "felafel-er." Am I nuts?

Cory Hinman, another liberal Evangelical who, if he's not nuts, fears that his brother in Christ Bill O'Reilly makes a mistake common among Christians, in that rather than letting Jesus impress His values on him, O'Reilly impresses his values on Jesus.

Ann Arbor, MI