June 21, 2004

MAILBAG ARCHIVES  
The BuzzFlash Mailbag

The opinions expressed in the Mailbag are not necessarily those of BuzzFlash. Read the BuzzFlash FAQ for info on submitting to the Mailbag.


Subject: Help Needed for Farhenheit 9/11

Buzz,

My family in Madison, WI, wants to see Fahrenheit 9/11. But it looks like the Marcus movie chain may have pulled it due to the Right Wing. Now, nowhere in Madison will be playing 9/11. Can you alert your readers and tell them to call their local movie houses and demand they show Fahrenheit 9/11.

Best,

Chutter


Subject: presidential prayer team

The Presidential Prayer Team is compiling a commemorative book for George W. Bush's birthday July 6th. Let's all be sure to send our thoughts to King George on this very special day!

www.presidentialprayerteam.org

Mary Johnson


Subject: Response Re Farenheit 9/11

I sent an email to the Little Theatre thanking them for showing Farenheit 9/11. The response I received below, quoting Amendment I of our Constitution, blew me away!

The Little Theatre will be showing FAHRENHEIT 9/11, opening June 25.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Keep sending those emails folks thanking all the theaters who have decided to show Michael Moore's movie. The Website listing them is:

http://www.moveamericaforward.org/MichaelMoore/

This is an anti-Moore Web site, but it lists all the theaters who intend to show the movie
and those who are sitting on the fence.

Claire


Subject: here we go again......

Dear Buzz,

Here we go again.....I find it amazing that in the capture of Mr. Johnson by Al Qaeda in Saudi Arabia, that for days the Saudis were 'looking' for this group of terrorists/kidnappers to no avail, but today 6/18 after the announcement of the beheading of Mr. Johnson, Saudi officials announce that they killed the leader of this group,who just so happens to be the second in command of Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden. Wow, they managed to 'find' him in one day, when they couldn't before? Give me a break, the Saudis knew where he was all along! Think about how stupid this sounds, is anyone besides me thinking this way?...Hmmmm ...just wondering.

A Loyal Buzz Fan Forever!

Sharon Carlton
Bellevue, Nebraska


Subject: 9/11 Commission

Hi Buzz,

I'm freeking ready to go postal over the 9/11 commission's report.  Talk about a cover up!  You may recall that not long ago there was a news report that a FAA manager destroyed the tape that the air traffic controllers made on 9/11 following the hijackings.  After they made the tape they were relieved of their duties so they could receive some kind of grief counseling.  No one would begrudge them that.  What I want to know is why the commission failed to address the incident?.  Did they ever interview any of those air traffic controllers?  Did they make an effort to find out what was on the tape?  Did they even bother to ask the manager why he/she destroyed the tape?  I just have a nagging feeling that we're missing out on something important there.  Maybe we need Michael Moore to investigate the major screw-ups of the FAA on 9/11.  I think I'd trust him before I'd trust another government commission that seems to be afraid to find out what the hell happened.

I keep trying to find the silver lining in this mess.  Like Bush's WMDs, it has to be somewhere.  Perhaps it lies in the fact that anyone who paid even a little bit of attention throughout the 9/11 commission hearings had to have noticed the poor leadership this administration has repeatedly demonstrated.  How can anyone continue to believe that Bush and his piss-poor administration are better at protecting this country against terrorists than John Kerry would be?  Or for that matter, you or me or any of the BuzzFlash readers and contributors who have functioning brains and actually use them.  Then again, I read that Dimson's poll numbers went up following Reagan's death.  And a majority now believe things are going well in Iraq.  It may be difficult finding a silver lining in all that dreary news.  I'll try though and I'll let you know when I've found it.

Thanks again Buzz for being there.

Judy Maclean
Colorado


Subject: Check out AOL News - Al-Qaida Cell Posts Photos of Johnson's Beheading

Bush asked for a war against Islamic militants and now he has one. Not only in Afghanistan and Iraq but in every country with a sizable Muslim population. What should have been a police action to capture a band of terrorsts has become a holy war, Islamic Fundamentalists and nationalists against Zionists, and the Fundamentalist Christians who, along with the corporate interests, have taken over the US. They are not going after your average American, They are targeting Americans who work for the war machine and their allies in the media. But soon it will be the average American caught in the crossfire, just as now the average Iraqi and Palestinian is caught daily in the crossfire. The attack on the Twin towers could have been a symbol to rally the world in favor of a just American cause. Instead the Bushites couldn't resist turning it into a war against Iraq and liberal America. The passage of the patriot act was a declaration of war against all Americans who believe in fair play, decency and democracy. It was an assault upon the freedoms of people all over the world who do not step in line and support the corporate take over of the planet. The Al-Qaida may have represented a small group of fundamentalists at one time. Now they represent the aspirations of the downtrodden of the third world who identify as Muslims and a lot who just like the way that a small group has taken on the United States, the biggest and Baddest macho Machine in the world.

Those of us who represent the voice of rationality and spreading the wealth into an increasing percentage of the world and who want to see responsible development that accounts for the needs of the environment, other species and the other people on the planet, those of us who care about what happens next door and around the world, we are being identified with the fundamentalists by the Bushites. They are playing the old game, you are either with us or against us. But it won't work any more. We are more sophisticated then we were back in the days of tricky Dick Nixon, and there are a lot more of us.. And Putin can't trick us with that sleight of hand game.

Gary Rumor


Subject: Draft Duhhbya's girls !!

Buzz,

Feeling the draft - which demands, "All men and women between the ages of 18 and 26 would have to serve in some form of national service, not necessarily a combat position, for a minimum of two years."  Surely Duhhbya's girls fit into draft-able category - with NO EXEMPTIONS !!   Bring 'em on! - maybe they'll grow up a bit (like their papa never did).

T. Quigly


Subject: Bush to Congress 3/18/03--Saddam Hussein Linked to 9/11

To BuzzFlashers concerned about the repeated lies linking Saddam Hussein and 9/11...

Thanks to Debra H. for alerting us to the USA Today story by Mimi Hall that mentions Bush's 3/18/03 eve-of-war letter to Congress justifying the invasion of Iraq. Here's the link to the official letter from the White House that says the invasion was a necessary action "against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001. So much for Rice's statement on NPR 6/18--"We've always said...that we do not have any evidence that Saddam Hussein had anything to do with 9/11." Rice's comments were one part of the White House's coordinated offensive this week to counter the 9/11 Commission Report. Continue to press for the truth.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030321-5.html

Judy Munro-Leighton


Subject: Saddam & OBL

The new operative phrase seems to be that there were “numerous contacts” between Saddam & OBL. Sort of reminds one of the “weapons of mass destruction program related activities” morphing of the rhetoric, does it not?

Turk Meister

ADDRULEHERE

Subject: Let's not forget

Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM.N) and ChevronTexaco (CVX.N) have received subpoenas from a federal prosecutor regarding the U.N.-run oil-for-food program in Iraq, the two largest U.S. oil companies said on Friday.

Oil Giants Get UN Oil - For - Food Subpoenas  (NY Times)

Let's not forget Condi was on the B of D of Chevron and that Hamid Karzai, the President of Afghanistan, is a former oil consultant for Chevron.

Rosamond

ADDRULEHERE

Subject: Why . . . Some Wonder . . .

BuzzFlash,

In reading your mail, I saw that a reader was disappointed in McCain's flattery towards Bush as he introduced him (paraphrasing). Just a wild guess, but if Cheney goes down, I think McCain could be asked to join the Bush team. Why not??

If he were to accept, I think it would be the end of his bipartisan career. Just a humble opinion, but the Bush team will stop at nothing and if they think he (McCain) could win them votes, this would not surprise me. Cheney could step down for several reasons -- because his . . . VP seat is getting too hot . . . certainly for medical reasons, or "just to spend more time with his family."

Maybe McCain is popular with everyone (both parties), but these are dangerous and deadly times and principles should dominate over political party or popularity . . . but I haven't seen any sign of this judging from the "congealed state of the Republican Party."

Just a thought,

Shirley Smith


Subject: KoKo

What Bush needs is a spanking by his mother.

Michael Barry
Reston, VA.


Subject: the horror of war

Is anyone out there feeling the same way I do? Every time I hear of another American who has been beheaded by the 'terrorists'... I really wonder, does this country think or wonder for a minute why? Did we not invade them....treat the prisoners abusively, then torture them?? Why do we wonder why our countrymen are getting slaughtered?

Everyone goes on camera...Bush, mostly, and berates them as, "There is no reason
to kill..." fill in the name! Yes, there is, Mr.Bush...you started an illegal war, invaded a country, tore it all to hell....killed innocents...what else do we need? I remember seeing an entire family wiped out by our soldiers...before the statue in Baghdad fell...a poor old family going to town in a broken down car...just to get supplies...the old woman was running around like a crazy person.... As her husband and kids lay dead, she said they had held up their hands and told the soldiers, "We are peaceful, we are a family, we are just going to get food." But, the soldiers killed them anyway!!  Is that humane?  Where am I wrong?  Why does everyone around me look at me as if I have lost my mind when I ask that?

I do not think I have ever been so ashamed as the day the soldiers pulled the statue of Saddam down...a few liked that...but a whole hell of a lot did not! Those are the ones who are going to really cause this country some problems. But, what the hell, Bush and Cheney will be safe in the tunnels they have dug at our expense...just like the ones the rulers of these eastern countries have!!  How in the world do we rise above this???? How do we stop it????

Someone has suggested going door to door to get Bush impeached!! I would do it in a heartbeat...but I am not a young person...and if my brothers and sons will not speak to me because I hate the man...how can I be sure the neighborhood will.? The only ones I have spoken to think Saddam had to go...I don't discuss it with many people anymore...because the entire world is so imbecilic...they think Saddam bombed the trade center...how can you talk to people with that kind of hard heads, with nothing inside, so mentally affected by the Bush Regime???

And, to Clarkie...I agree totally. McCain is not and never had been the man...he wants to be a Republican...even though Bush has treated him like shit...'scuse me! I think he loves to tease....and I am as sick of him as the rest of the Republicans. I do not think I have lived in a time when Republicans were so evil....why else would the Reagans not want to associate with them??? I hope Ron Reagan goes on the campaign trail...I think his voice might be heard!!!

I will always recall the first Iraqi war...back in 1991...when daddy bush went into Iraq.... I was against that, too, but thought we were helping an ally...so I didn't hate the man as much...but I can remember seeing young soldiers shipped out...young...I mean, like the ones now in the Guard....and this 18 yr.old soldier, just outfitted, said as he was leaving...someone asked him how he felt about leaving to fight this war...and he had an almost evil grin, like the dungeons and dragons game the kids played then, and said, "Oh, I cannot wait to get over there and kill someone!!!" My husband heard this and had to leave the room...and he is a rabid republican!!

What is it about Republicans...other than maybe Reagan....even though he was a typical Republican with everything for the rich, nothing for the poor or middle class...what is it that makes them so adoring of the entire war thing? Why do they love to fight anything? It is so depressing to see this happen day after day, and no one in the world catch on!!!!! I find myself almost wishing someone would take them out of my misery!!! Does Bush think he is the Savior and is going to cause Armaggedon...like in the Bible? There are those on political chat rooms who think he is...and Geeeez it is scary...because I do not think that is the way it should happen!!

Shirley.............St.Louis


Subject: Remember Greenpeace and Exxon and Ashcroft

Dear BuzzFlash,

Your story about Ashcroft seeking Corporate help to stymie lawsuits...

Bush Justice Dept. asks energy industry for help fighting suits

calls to mind that old story about Greenpeace unearthing the Exxon memo, where, apparently, Ashcroft incited Exxon to issue their own lawsuit to stymie the EPA.

http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en//news/details?item%5fid=308563

It was subsequent to that revelation, by the way, that Greenpeace found itself charged under a law not used for over a hundred years.

Here's an except from the Greenpeace link.

...In the email, Myron Ebell of the Exxon-funded Competitive Enterprise Institute writes to Phil Cooney, a senior official at the White House Council for Environmental Quality. He describes his plans to discredit an EPA study on climate change through a lawsuit. He states the need to "drive a wedge between the President and those in the Administration who think that they are serving the president's interests by publishing this rubbish." He notes his group is considering a call for the then-head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Christine Todd Whitman, to resign, and openly suggests that she'd make an appropriate "fall gal" if the administration is serious about getting back into bed with conservatives opposing action on climate change.

His memo to the US government official begins "Thanks for calling and asking for our help."

I have a theory about Ashcroft. Remember when he put drapery over the bossom of the "Spirit of Justice" statue? Here's my theory: It wasn't prudishness on Ashcroft's part, it was jealousy. After all, he's been obsessed with screwing Justice ever since he got in office.

Jim P


Subject: Fahrenheit 911 - R rating

Buzz,

Michael Moore is contesting the 'R' rating for Fahrenheit 911.  The movie rating board gave it this rating because of the  "violent and disturbing images and for language...graphic footage of corpses of US soldiers being burnt, dragged behind a truck and strung up, and a scene of US soldiers apparently mistreating Iraqi prisoners."  

Ratings Row over Moore Iraq film (BBC News)

Since Moore has simply filmed the horror of the Iraq invasion and occupation, the rating board's decision confirms the anti-Viet-Nam-war message that "War is not healthy for children and other living things."

T. Quigly


Hi BuzzFlash,

Re: Lauer interview with Michael Moore on Dateline:

Michael Moore to Matt Lauer: "You know I've been sitting here for like the last 20 minutes thinking, man, if he would have only asked Bush administration officials these kind of hard questions in the weeks leading up to the war, and then when the war started, maybe there wouldn't be a war.

Moore defends incendiary film

That line says it all. It just says everything. And Matt Lauer had no answer for it. With all of his false bravado -- asking his hard ass questions to Michael Moore. Give me a break. Lauer's eyes looked like Charles Manson's. He was so over the top in attacking Michael Moore.

The mainstream media don't want this movie seen any more than the Bushies do. It embarrasses them. Michael Moore did their job for them.

Barbara in NYC


Subject: A "discrepancy" in "Will Michael Moore's Facts Check Out?"

Dear [NY Times] Editors:

Why is it that Mr. Shenon's facts don't check out?

I wish to point out a "discrepancy" to actual facts (which may or may not have been intentional, but the implication seems to discredit Michael Moore's reporting of the facts) in Philip Shenon's June 20 article "Will Michael Moore's Facts Check Out?"

Mr. Shenon states:

... the Sept. 11 commission said in a report this April that there was 'no credible evidence that any chartered flights of Saudi Arabian nationals departed the United States before the reopening of national airspace' and that the F.B.I. had concluded that no one aboard the flights was involved in Sept. 11.

What Mr. Shenon curiously avoids printing, and most certainly must have known (and most certainly SHOULD HAVE known, if indeed, he did not), is the fact that the Tampa International Airport has recently acknowledged (on June 9, 2004) that the flights in question carrying Saudi Arabian nationals DID take place, during the time of the "No Fly" order, which kept all other commercial and private flights grounded, and both Bill Clinton and Al Gore (in separate global locations) from returning to the United States.
See the article TIA now verifies flight of Saudis of June 9, 2004 in the St. Petersburg Times:

The terrorism panel, better known as the 9/11 Commission, said in April that it knew of six chartered flights with 142 people aboard, mostly Saudis, that left the United States between Sept. 14 and 24, 2001.

The St. Petersburg Times article also states:
Two days after the Sept. 11 attacks, with most of the nation's air traffic still grounded, a small jet landed at Tampa International Airport, picked up three young Saudi men and left.

The men, one of them thought to be a member of the Saudi royal family, were accompanied by a former FBI agent and a former Tampa police officer on the flight to Lexington, Ky.

The Saudis then took another flight out of the country. The two ex-officers returned to TIA a few hours later on the same plane.

For nearly three years, White House, aviation and law enforcement officials have insisted the flight never took place and have denied published reports and widespread Internet speculation about its purpose.

But now, at the request of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks, TIA officials have confirmed that the flight did take place and have supplied details.

The odyssey of the small LearJet 35 is part of a larger controversy over the hasty exodus from the United States in the days immediately after 9/11 of members of the Saudi royal family and relatives of Osama bin Laden."

Now, it seems to me that if a smaller, less well-funded newspaper could print the TRUTH of the matter, so could the New York Times ... if that was actually your intent, especially at the time, by your own inept and long overdue admission, of falling down on your job of proper editorial scrutiny in matters related to the "War on Terror".

Please... get it right BEFORE you print it, or just admit that you really prefer to hold Bush in a better light, and thereby permit little "editorial slips," regardless of what the TRUTH of the matter may be!

Perhaps your subscription to the St. Petersburg Times might help.

At any rate, it seems that a correction and apology to Michael Moore is in order.

nerdeaux in Idyho


Subject: Contempt of Congress

I would like to know if I have just missed the contempt of Congress meetings for Ashcroft and his torture memo. Does he not get punished? Just what is happening?

Dennis Tucker


Subject: Fahrenheit 911

Buzz,

The New York Times movie reviewer states "conservative commentators [will be] eager to prove sloppiness and exaggeration in...[Fahrenheit 9/11].... Mr. Moore may face an onslaught of fact-checking unlike anything he -- or any other documentary filmmaker -- has ever experienced. "  These same "conservative commentators," without one-minute's-worth of "fact-checking," accepted every lie Duhhhbya and the Cabal put out as excuse to invade and occupy Iraq -- lies the Cabal fabricated without its own one-minute's-worth of "fact-checking."

Dateline NBC started its interview with Moore with, "The White House communications director said of your film, it is so outrageously false it's not even worth commenting."  So that is how the Cabal slimes F-911 without debating the facts presented -- "it's not worth commenting."

And Disney, who was too beholden to Jeb to distribute F-911, is going to "bring Disneyland to Pakistan as well as set up a museum called ‘Planet Museum of Celebrities' for the statues of famous media artists...from the world of glitz and glam."

[Pakistan Daily Times - 'Mickey Mouse May Come to Town']

Can anyone spell 'culture-clash' or 'parallel-universes'?  Strange, strange world!

T Quigly


Subject: Fox affiliate encourages censorship

Hey fellow Buzzers,

Tonight I was watching Mad TV on KTVU2, our local FOX affiliate, when a promo came on for their “Mornings on 2” show. At approximately 11:22, part of the announcement said, “Why you shouldn’t see Michel Moore’s new movie.”

Needless to say, I was floored, FLOORED to see a news outlet dare to suggest that on the say-so of some dim bulb talking head, that I ought not see a movie that raises serious questions about the motives and judgment of our pResident during the most perilous time in modern history! I mean really, what they’re saying in essence is trust our judgment and don’t bother your beautiful mind over this trivial piece of propaganda. As though I can not view the damn thing and make up my own mind!

Is it just me, or does anyone else think that a line has been crossed when a news organization takes such a stance? Needless to say, I tried to call immediately to register my outrage, but I got no answer. The phone number is (510) 874-0242. I ask everyone reading this to call KTVU’s management to register your complaint. I also think a complaint with the FCC is in order.

But it occurs to me, since this was a FOX affiliate, is it possible that other affiliates across the country have made similar statements? You tell me buzzers. If so we should blow this thing up big time. Rub their friggin noses in it. I think it is time to take a note out of the right winger' playbooks and go for having their licenses yanked.

I’d love to see some feedback on this one way or another.

Jay Bagi
San Francisco, CA


Subject: More proof Bush lied

Now the administration is saying that they never said that Iraq was involved in 9/11. Surprise, it's another lie!!!! Could they get more deceptive? Well, let's look at the letter Bush was forced to send to congress to comply with the War Resolution:

March 18, 2003

Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:)

Consistent with section 3(b) of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243), and based on information available to me, including that in the enclosed document, I determine that:

(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic and other peaceful means alone will neither (A) adequately protect the national security of the
United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq nor (B) likely lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions
regarding Iraq; and

(2) acting pursuant to the Constitution and Public Law 107-243 is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or
aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.

Sincerely,

GEORGE W. BUSH

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030319-1.html

So, next time they say that they didn't try to mislead us into believing that 9/11 and Saddam were linked--tell them to look at their own website. As usual with the Bush administration--the truth is out there for all to see. The problem is they will tell you that the truth either doesn't exist or that what you know is not a fact.

Regards,

Ron Russell
San Francisco, CA


Subject: Ronald Reagan's legacy

Dear Buzz,

The death of Ronald Reagan brought a cascade of memories to me.

Coming here from Canada in 1977, I had always thought the United States was the most creative and progressive and forward-looking country in the world. I had been in this country as an immigrant for only four years when Reagan was elected, and I couldn't believe it. That is how little I understood some aspects of the American psyche and the ideological proclivities of American media.

Until Bush the younger came to power I definitely thought Reagan was "worst president ever." During the Democratic debates Dick Gephardt said a number of times that George W. Bush made him long for Ronald Reagan, and I knew exactly what he meant. (I have to admit, Al Qaeda makes me long for the Soviet Union.) 

It's true that George W. Bush makes Ronald Reagan seem benign, but in reality the policies of his presidency were very destructive. Furthermore, I believe it was during the Reagan era that we began to see the extreme political ruthlessness, distortion of truth, and incivility that are standard Republican practice today.

Reagan presided over the destruction of PATCO, the cruel non-response to the AIDS crisis, the increase of poverty, the useless tax cuts, the huge deficits, the destruction of the environment, the ruinous increase in wasteful and useless defence spending, the reversal of policy on nuclear weapons that scared most of the world (I bet a lot of Buzzers remember the 1.2 million strong demonstration in NYC in 1982 against nuclear war), the brutal suppression of genuine liberation movements in Central America in the name of fighting communism, not to mention an extremely corrupt administration.

The romanticization of Reagan and the Reagan years is sickening and alarming. How can we expect to do better in the world if, as a nation, we don't have a better grip on reality?

Leslie Smith
Winchester, MA


Subject: Ken Lay prosecution

Is there any chance the Ken Lay prosecution is heating up so he can make a plea bargain

before the election and then be pardoned before Bush leaves office?

Mike D.

ADDRULEHERE

Subject: Fascinating 1997 Ashcroft Article

You might find this 1997 article by Senator John Ashcroft on the dangers of government Big Brotherism and threats to Fourth Amendment rights interesting.

"Keep Big Brother's Hands Off the Internet"

http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itgic/1097/ijge/gj-7.htm

Janet H.

ADDRULEHERE

Subject: Cold Comfort

"I read the news today, Oh boy." This line from an old Beatles tune played in my head today as I finished reading my newspaper. Like all good music, it gives me a different meaning at different times in my life. The news today. Oh boy.

In the newspaper today there was a story about a memo regarding the redefining of torture, and there was a Bush response in regard to said memo. A reporter asked the President if he had approved the use of torture for our prisoners in Afghanistan and Iraq. Bush responded "I told our people to adhere to the laws of the United States." When pressed further and asked if the law of the United States was now that of the memo, or of the old Geneva standards, Bush replied, "Look, I am going to say it one more time. The instructions went out to our people to adhere to the law. That ought to comfort you." He did not ever answer the intrepid reporter's question. He evaded it with this strange choice of words. "Comfort you."

Hmmmm. Funny, I don't feel comforted. In fact, his words left me feeling slightly sick, and gave me an odd feeling that something very bad is happening in my country.

To tell the truth, I wish I could be comforted. I search every day for good news to comfort me, and sometimes I find it. But every time I do, I am confronted with the fact that for every good thing this administration claims to have accomplished, there is an ugly, often scary dark side that goes along with it and it outweighs any good that could have come from it.

I suppose I should be comforted by the fact that the 9/11 Commission found "no credible link" between Iraq and Al-qaida. Yet this is cold comfort now, after we invaded and killed thousands of Iraqis. Bush misled this nation into a violent conflict with Iraq by making Americans think that they were closely tied to Al Qaida by statements like this one he made in regard to Saddam Hussein in Dearborn Michigan. Bush stated: "This is a man that we know has had ties with Al Qaida. This is a man, who, in my judgment, would like to use Al Qaida as a forward army." This statement, along with others, was told to a scared and susceptible American public. We are supposed to be able to believe our president when he says Saddam would like to use Al Qaida as a forward army. Alas, twas not true.

I suppose I could find comfort in the fact that in the days after 9/11 the Congress and Senate got together to fix the communications problems between the CIA and the FBI. But this is cold comfort to me now, since the solution they gave us was the civil rights infringing Patriot Act. The administration tried to comfort us with the idea that it would not be used against regular citizens, just terrorist suspects. Too bad they have already taken to using it against regular American citizens. The FBI recently used the Patriot act to obtain financial information about figures in a political corruption probe centered on Las Vegas club owner Michael Galardi. Political corruption, while not nice, is not terrorism. There have been other abuses of Patriot Act, and so no, I am not comforted.

In normal times, I would take comfort in the fact that the military has been investigating itself regarding its abuses of prisoners at its various facilities. I would feel they were on top of the problem, ashamed of what happened in those secret cells, and ready to call themselves to act in a higher manner. But I read today that Rumsfeld, on the request of George Tenent, himself approved the hiding of at least one prisoner from the Red Cross. These ghost detainees are shipped from facility to facility...their names never recorded officially...their status and well being never determined. One prisoner. I could take cold comfort that it was only one. But I can't even take that because my gut (and evidentiary letters the Red Cross sent to Rumsfeld) tell me otherwise.

In better times, I would take comfort that America was a place where no black suburban ever pulled up beside you and pulled you in. Here you could not become one of the "disappeared" like they have in Argentina. Oh, I read the news today. Oh Boy. It seems one of our young US citizens was snatched just like that. Wasn't heard from for weeks. The young man's name is Sherman Austin and it seems he had a website where he voiced his opinion on Bush. And because he carried brake fluid and gas in his trunk (he drove a 1981 Toyota with a broken gas gauge) as emergency supplies he is being accused of having the stuff to make a bomb. Well, I have brake fluid in my car, and when I go to the garden center, I have fertilizer in it as I drive home. Because I am going to fertilize my roses am I now considered a terrorist? Will one day soon a black Suburban pull alongside me and pull me inside and keep me incommunicado for weeks or months or years?

One thing most people seem to take comfort in is the fact that Bush is a religious man. Certainly his Christianity would call him to treat all kindly, to be merciful to those who suffer, to offer aid to the stranger. Yet, I sense no Balm of Gilead in his sort of religion. Indeed, from his own words there is no comfort to be found...instead discrimination and hostility is there. This President, this leader of this pluralistic country where there is separation between church and state once said: "I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one Nation under God." Hmmm....since World War II about 2 million atheists have fought for this country. A few thousand have given their lives for it. Yet this man who is supposed to have a heart filled with Christian charity finds none in it for the citizens of this country who believe in no God, yet fought and died to uphold the moral principle of freedom. No, no comfort here.

There are other places to find comfort. The senate has had committee meetings where they questioned pretty harshly Attorney General Ashcroft for having his department come up with legal documents that tried to redefine torture. This however is extremely cold comfort, since what was in those memos chilled me to the bone. It appears that this administration has tried to have torture defined as being "equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impaired bodily function or even death." So cutting off of hands is not torture because it does not cause organ failure or death? What is most discomforting is that there are way too many Americans who see nothing wrong with torturing. They do not see in themselves the reflection of the gulag, or the concentration camp.

No Mr. Bush, you bring me no comfort. Your administration has no problem in locking up and punishing American citizens who simply have a political difference with you. You are scary because your fundamentalist beliefs make you think you are in sole possession of the truth. You have mislead the American people into an unnecessary war and caused the deaths of over 800 service people. Indirectly, you are responsible for the death of over 100 contractors. You have the blood of thousands of Iraqis on your hands. The only thing I now take comfort in is the fact there will be an election in 2004, and maybe we can get you out of office. However, I read the news today, and I see where your brother Jeb is trying again to remove people from the voter rolls. With this, the thought of an election becomes cold comfort indeed.

Liesse Hand


Subject: With Putin and Bush It's the OIL

From my blog, The Spoon Report, http://www.spoonreport.blogspot.com/ , June 18:

...Russia is estimated to have the second largest petroleum reserves in the world after Saudi Arabia. For his part Putin wants to control the Russian oil industry from his Kremlin office rather than the upstart capitalist Mikhail Khodorkovsky, head of Yukos Oil. At one time slated to become the fourth-largest private oil producer, the company is now in danger of bankruptcy as a Moscow court ruled it must pay $3.4 billion in back taxes. Not only that but Yukos chief Khodorkovsky is under indictment for fraud, tax evasion and embezzlement. Khodorkovsky's biggest sin seems that he had the temerity to consider a run against Putin in last year's Russian election. Now it's not that Khodorkovsky probably isn't guilty of some of the charges against him, Hell he's a businessman after all, but for Putin it was a mighty convenient way of eliminating a political opponent. Dubya probably wishes he could get rid of John Kerry so easily. So as Saudi reserves shrink oil addicted Uncle Sucker looks for a new pusher. Dubya and Puti-Poot understand one another and if they can direct oil profits into their own pockets so much the better.

E.T. Spoon


Subject: Why Won't Westar Release It's Report on the DeLay Contributions?

Rep. Chris Bell (D-TX) yesterday filed an ethics complaint against Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX) alleging that, among other things, Tom DeLay violated the federal bribery statute by accepting a $25,000 soft money contribution from Westar in exchange for ensuring that Westar's pet provision was added to the energy bill. Westar hired an outside law firm, O'Connor & Hannan, to prepare a second special report focusing just on Westar's political contributions during the Wittig era. That report was prepared by a lawyer named Tim Jenkins with O'Connor & Hannan in Washington, D.C., and was finished and sent to Westar's board months ago, but Westar refuses to release it. It certainly seems likely that the House Ethics Committee will ask for a copy of the report on the political contribution investigation. If requested will Westar provide it? What if the House Ethics Committee tries to subpoena it?

Here's a link to the Tim Jenkins bio on the O'Connor & Hannan Web site:

http://www.oconnorhannan.com/atttjenkins.htm

Here's link to Westar Energy's media representatives:

http://www.wr.com/corp_com/contentmgt.nsf/publishedpages/newsroom

It says that they'll be happy to answer inquiries from the media. Perhaps if this information were out on the blogosphere some reporters would call and the report would be released?

Alfredo G.


Subject: A question for Matt Lauer instead of Michael Moore

Matt just said that MM would be back on today to answer viewers' questions, but I have one for Matt. Why should all of MM's facts be checked out when you lazy news guys don't care if Bush's, Cheney's or any other adminstration officials' facts check out?

Matt, ask Dubya and Dick a couple of questions about their facts to justify the sacrificing of over 800 Americans and 10's of 1,000's of Iraqis.

How's this? Did your connections between Saddam and Osama get lost with the WMD's? Will Cheney's proof cook his goose because of connection to the illegal business dealings between Saddam and Haliburton during the embargo?
NO: C heney A shcroft R umsfeld B ush

Speak up or they assume you agree!!!   ABB

Karen Webb
Moore, Ok.



BACK TO TOP