![]() |
|||||
|
September 3, 2003 |
|||||
The Words of the Prophets by Maureen Farrell "I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever. . . ." -- Thomas Jefferson, on eventual divine retribution for slavery "Fondly do we hope -- fervently do we pray -- that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue, until all the wealth piled by the bond -- men's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash, shall be paid by another drawn by the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said 'the judgments of the Lord, are true and righteous altogether.'" -- Abraham Lincoln, on the Civil War as divine retribution for slavery Though zealots might use the above quotes to prove that America is a Christian nation (and argue that God's wrath's will be visited upon us shall we not erect 10 Commandment monuments in state judiciary buildings), they refer, first and foremost, to the karmic repercussions of man's inhumanity to man. While Jefferson worried that retribution for slavery would eventually be exacted, Lincoln surmised that the Civil War was God's instrument for that reckoning. In other words, though obviously devout, they weren't advocating a Jerry Falwellian vision of America as Christian nation, but rather a quasi-John Lennonian notion of not-so-instant karma. The more secular among us might refer to this as "cause and effect" or "what goes around comes around" or even employ the CIA term, "blowback." But whatever you call it, Jefferson and Lincoln's musings on the subject prove that some lessons are eternal. Because these days, it seems, whenever you take an oil rich country, stage a coup to overthrow its government, install a brutal dictator, arm both it and its opponent in a protracted war, condone or condemn atrocities (depending upon convenience), ruin the country's infrastructure, impose sanctions that kill up to a million, litter the land with depleted uranium and turn a thriving nation into a third world county, it may rile the Powers that Be -- especially if, after shocking and awing the country once more for old time's sake, you kill 37,000 of its civilians, co-opt its natural resources and reap obscene profits for Halliburton, while patting yourself on the back for ousting the brutal dictator you installed in the first place. Of course, the wrath we're now experiencing -- and will experience as long as we stay in Iraq -- was widely foreseen by a cast of politicians, activists, generals and journalists. Deeming the Iraq war policy "a crock," Newsweek's senior editor Michael Hirsh said it was a "hugely risky operation," while career State Department diplomat John Brady Kiesling admitted much the same. "We have begun to dismantle the largest and most effective web of international relationships the world has ever known," he wrote in his resignation letter to Colin Powell. "Our current course will bring instability and danger, not security." General Wesley Clark also urged caution, while admitting, back in Aug. 2002, that hawks in high places privately acknowledged that Iraq wasn't a threat to the United States. [LINK] Scott Ritter repeatedly tried to address weapons of mass deception and in a blunt op-ed entitled "Don't Attack Saddam," former National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft flat-out said that a unilateral war would be a major mistake. Journalist Jay Bookman outlined the war's actual agenda -- and told us once we arrived in Iraq, we'd not be leaving. Gen. Eric Shinseki correctly predicted that we'd need "several hundred thousand troops" to occupy Iraq. And in February, an Army War College strategic study on "Reconstructing Iraq" predicted that "Without an overwhelming effort to prepare for occupation, the US may find itself in a radically different world over the next few years, a world in which the threat of Saddam Hussein seems like a pale shadow of new problems of America's own making." [LINK] In Feb. 2002, the Sydney Morning Herald predicted that the U.S. would ride roughshod over the U.N. and wage war regardless what Saddam and/or the international community said or did [LINK] and eight months later, reiterated its stance -- saying that the U.S. planned a military attack on Iraq five months before Sept. 11 in order to "secure control of its oil." [LINK] Sure enough, by the time some of Cheney's Energy Task Force's information was released in the summer of 2003 (those sections that weren't "stifled" by the Vice President, that is) two things were clear: 1) That task force documents contained maps of Iraq's oil wells and a list of "foreign suitors for Iraqi oilfield contracts" and 2) That the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy had recommended that Cheney's task force consider "a 'military' option in dealing with Iraq," months before the Sept. 11 attacks. [LINK] Though vilified as traitors or anti-American gadflies, many also tapped into a B.S.- detecting sixth sense. "I feel like the American people are being lied to and manipulated. [President Bush] is trying to force 9/11 and Saddam together," Janeane Garafolo explained. "Bush's arguments strain the limits of plausibility to justify war on Iraq, the Guardian's Simon Tisdall opined. And who can forget Sen. Robert Byrd prophetic vision? [LINK] So, yes, while it's doubtful we'll ever again see the likes of Jefferson or Lincoln, we had more than our share of post-9/11 prophets. With worldwide protests numbering in the millions and calls to Senate and House members running 2-1 against giving George Bush a "blank check" on Iraq, a chorus of modern-day Cassandras sang out against impending disaster. Amidst all this, however, some voices stood out. Here are but a few: The Christian Science Monitor Prediction:
This administration, like the last Bush administration, will distort
intelligence and lie its way to war.
Robert Fisk Prediction:
President Bush will go to war (and snub the UN) no matter what.
Denis Halliday Prediction: "An American invasion would be an international
crime -- and would make the U.S. even less safe." - March, 2002
Hunter S. Thompson Prediction:
The U.S. will engage in forever war, feed its citizens a steady
diet of disinformation and thrust us into darkness.
Reactions to Thompson's observations were less than warm and his credibility was questioned. But given that we now know TV was brimming with propaganda and disinformation and that the mainstream media consistently got it wrong, it's important to remember that while Thompson told us to brace for forever war, Newsweek predicted we were facing "the largest criminal investigation in the history of the nation." And in the immediate aftermath of September 11, when George Bush's approval rating hit 91% and the press corps was cowed into submission, Thompson warned that we were entering a new era of disinformation and distortion. [LINK] Though subsequent articles proved each prophet's prescience [LINK] [LINK] [LINK], Thompson's follow-ups have been hardest hitting of all. In a radio interview in Sept. 2002, he warned that "the gang of thieving, lobbyists for the military industrial complex" in the White House was hell-bent on attacking Iraq and added, "if to be against them is to be patriotic, then hell, call me a traitor." He also addressed "Wag the Dog" tactics and Sept. 11 mysteries. "I have spent enough time on the inside of, well in the White House and you know, campaigns, and I've known enough people who do these things, think this way, to know that the public version of the news or whatever event, is never really what happened. And these people, I think, are willing to take that even further. So I don't assume that I know the truth about what went on that day [Sept. 11]." He added, however, that the White House certainly had a lot to gain. [LINK] "Oh look, that's just another conspiracy theory from a drug-addled Gonzo journalist like Hunter S. Thompson," the interviewer said, of probable reactions to Thompson's musings. And that's probably so. But given his track record thus far, the Good Doctor's most recent predictions bear repeating: Source: Big Darkness, July 22, 2003
Source: The Nation's Capital, July 29, 2003
Source: Nightmare in La-La-Land, August 17, 2003
Though nobody knows what the future holds, questions remain. Will Iraq determine its own government? Will it control its own oil? Will democracy and peace flourish throughout the Middle East? So far, smart money isn't riding on the neoconservative's rosy forecast. Which brings us back to power of prophecy. Else you think it's all "Elvis Meets Bigfoot" type hype, well, there is more to heaven and earth than is dreamt of in your philosophy, Horatio. After all, Thomas Jefferson was right to "tremble for his country" and did so until he died on July 4, 1826, on the 50th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, just hours before fellow founding father John Adams passed on. And who can forget Lincoln's premonition of his own death, just days before his assassination? [LINK] We've
had countless modern prophets warning us about Bush and Iraq, who
were all pooh-poohed until now. Perhaps it's time to stop marginalizing
and vilifying our Cassandras and start paying attention? Because
if we don't, it will take but a wee while before prophecy becomes
fact -- and you can bet your bottom dollar that "Big Darkness,
soon come." |
|||||
|
Maureen Farrell is a writer and media consultant who specializes in helping other writers get television and radio exposure. © Copyright 2003, Maureen Farrell |
|||||
| DAILY BUZZ | ||||
| INTERVIEWS | ||||
| ANALYSIS | ||||
| MEDIA LINKS | ||||
|
Unless
otherwise noted, all original |
||||