| January 5, 2005 | ||
| How can it be controversial to remind people that voting is a civil right? A BUZZFLASH READER CONTRIBUTION The following was sent to Clear Channel CEO John Hogan by overnight mail on January 4, 2005. * * * January 4, 2005 John Hogan
Dear Sir: I am writing about a problem I have with WGY, a Clear Channel station based in Albany, New York. The problem occurred when I tried to place a series of issue ads on WGY. These ads concern the federal deficit, the right to vote, America’s oil dependence, Iraq, dissent, and Christianity. WGY is an all-talk radio station, and the biggest station in the area where I live. It is my choice of venue and where I want to spend my money. But so far, WGY has refused to accept my ads and more pointedly, refused to provide any explanation as to why my ads have been rejected. The only communication I have received is that "our programming staff would not approve your ads." As WGY, indeed any broadcaster, derives income from the use of public airwaves, I believe WGY has an obligation to provide some reason for denying a citizen access to their advertising market. To phrase this as an analogy, I have the money and I want to buy a Chevy. The Chevy dealer cannot look me over and say, "You’re not the kind of person we want associated with our product. Go buy a Ford." Now, I have nothing against Ford, they make a perfectly good product, but I want a Chevy. It is, or should be, my choice. I find it a real stretch to believe that WGY’s listeners would find commentary on the size of the national debt to amount to unacceptable content, or that reminding listeners of our dependence on foreign oil is inappropriate. And how can it be controversial to remind people that voting is a civil right? I have written to WGY about this issue on four occasions, but they prefer not to respond. That is why I am turning to you with the same question -- What is objectionable about these ads? Is it one ad or all seven? Is it specific language? What? I want to know. This is not a theoretical exercise. I am trying to spend my money in a specific market and on a specific station, WGY. If WGY can articulate a reason why it considers my ads inappropriate, I can then consider changing the ads to suit WGY. This is a basic, fair-play issue. To quote the FCC’s position on freedom of speech and use of the airwaves (http://ftp.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/freespeech.html):
The text of my issue ads is attached. Sincerely, Robert Millman * * * TEXT OF SEVEN PAID RADIO MOMENTS Robert Millman [BuzzFlash Note: Click spot title to hear the ad.] This is a paid radio moment-- 2. INCUMBENCY/REDISTRICTING SPOT This is a paid radio moment-- This is a paid radio moment-- This is a paid radio moment-- This is a paid radio moment-- 6. DISSENT SPOT This is a paid radio moment-- This is a paid radio moment A BUZZFLASH READER CONTRIBUTION More on Robert's efforts to air his radio ads: Dear Clear Channel, What's Your Position on Free Speech? - December 31, 2004 My Fight With Clear Channel - December 29, 2004 Clear Channel Tramples on First Amendment Rights. It Won't Allow a Modern Day Paul Revere on the Public Airwaves, Even if He Pays. - December 29, 2004 | ||
|
Interested in contributing an article to BuzzFlash? Click here for more info. Articles in the BuzzFlash Contributor section are posted as-is. Given the timeliness of some Contributor articles, BuzzFlash cannot verify or guarantee the accuracy of every word. We strive to correct inaccuracies when they are brought to our attention. |
||