|
Authorization of Torture by Bush an Impeachable Offense
A
BUZZFLASH READER CONTRIBUTION
The
United States DID ratify the Convention back in 1994.
(CONVENTION
AGAINST TORTURE)
We
also passed a federal statute outlawing it, and assigning severe criminal
penalties.
See: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/pIch113C.html and http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/2340A.html.
(a)
Offense. -
Whoever outside the United States commits or attempts to commit torture
shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both,
and
if death results to any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection,
shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for
life.
(b) Jurisdiction. -
There is jurisdiction over the activity prohibited in subsection (a)
if -
(1)
the alleged offender is a national of the United States; or
(2)
the alleged offender is present in the United States, irrespective of
the
nationality of the victim or alleged offender.
(c) Conspiracy. -
A person who conspires to commit an offense under this section shall
be
subject to the same penalties (other than the penalty of death) as the
penalties
prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of
the
conspiracy.
So,
arguably, it's an impeachable offense for the President of the United
States to authorize the use of torture under any circumstances.
I sure hope Dubyah doesn't mind the color orange.
http://counterspin.blogspot.com/2004/05/tortured-logic-umm.html
-----------------------------------
CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE
and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment
http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cat.html
An
excerpt
-
Article 2
1.
Each State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative,
judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory
under its
jurisdiction.
2.
No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or
a
threat or war, internal political instability or any other public emergency,
may be
invoked as a justification of torture.
3. An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be
invoked
as a justification of torture.
Article 3
1. No
State Party shall expel, return ("refouler") or extradite
a person to
another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that
he would
be in danger of being subjected to torture.
2.
For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the
competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations including,
where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent
pattern
of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
A
BUZZFLASH READER CONTRIBUTION
|