March 23, 2004
Statement of Senator Tom Daschle on the Administration Attacking Good People for Telling the Truth
BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION
BuzzFlash Note: BuzzFlash readers know that we have been highly critical of Tom Daschle's performance as Minority Leader in the Senate. In fact, we have repeatedly called for his resignation in editorials and headlines. However, his Senate office sent us the following statement that Daschle made on the Senate floor this week, and we want to say, finally, "Good job Senator Daschle!"
We hope that this indicates a new trend in Daschle's stance, and that we will see fewer comments that end up being used on the Bush/Cheney weblog to indicate that Daschle supports many of Bush's policies, including his conduct of the Iraq War.
But we are open minded and glad to give credit where credit is due.
As far as the following statement by Senator Daschle, BuzzFlash says, "Keep it up, Senator! Nicely said, indeed."
* * *
of Senator Tom Daschle on the
I want to talk this morning about a disturbing pattern of conduct by the people around President Bush. They seem to be willing to do anything for political purposes, regardless of the facts and regardless of whatís right.
I donít have the time this morning to talk in detail about all the incidents that come to mind. Larry Lindsay, for instance, seems to have been fired as the Presidentís Economic Advisor because he spoke honestly about the costs of the Iraq War. General Shinseki seems to have become a target when he spoke honestly about the number of troops that would be needed in Iraq.
There are many others, who are less well known, who have also faced consequences for speaking out. U.S. Park Police Chief Teresa Chambers was suspended from her job when she disclosed budget problems that our nationís parks are less safe, and Professor Elizabeth Blackburn was replaced on the Council on Bioethics because of her scientific views on stem-cell research.
Each of these examples deserves examination, but they are not my focus today.
Instead, I want to talk briefly about four other incidents that are deeply troubling.
When former Treasury Secretary Paul OíNeill stepped forward to criticize the Bush Administrationís Iraq policy, he was immediately ridiculed by the people around the President and his credibility was attacked. Even worse, the Administration launched a government investigation to see if Secretary OíNeill improperly disclosed classified documents. He was, of course, exonerated, but the message was clear. If you speak freely, there will be consequences.
Ambassador Joseph Wilson also learned that lesson. Ambassador Wilson, who by all accounts served bravely under President Bush in the early 1990s, felt a responsibility to speak out on President Bushís false State of the Union statement on Niger and uranium. When he did, the people around the President quickly retaliated. Within weeks of debunking the Presidentís claim, Ambassador Wilsonís wife was the target of a despicable act.
Her identity as a deep-cover CIA agent was revealed to Bob Novak, a syndicated columnist, and was printed in newspapers around the country. That was the first time in our history, I believe, that the identity and safety of a CIA agent was disclosed for purely political purposes. It was an unconscionable and intolerable act.
Around the same time Bush Administration officials were endangering Ambassador Wilsonís wife, they appear to have been threatening another federal employee for trying to do his job. In recent weeks Richard Foster, an actuary for the Department of Health and Human Services, has revealed that he was told he would be fired if he told Congress and the American people the real costs of last yearís Medicare bill.
Mr. Foster, in an e-mail he wrote on June 26 of last year, said the whole episode had been "pretty nightmarish." He wrote: "Iím no longer in grave danger of being fired, but there remains a strong likelihood that I will have to resign in protest of the withholding of important technical information from key policymakers for political purposes."
Think about those words. He would lose his job if he did his job. If he provided the information the Congress and the American people deserved and were entitled to, he would lose his job. When did this become the standard for our government? When did we become a government of intimidation?
And now, in today's newspapers, we see the latest example of how the people around the President react when faced with facts they want to avoid.
The White Houseís former lead counter-terrorism advisor, Richard Clarke, is under fierce attack for questioning the White Houseís record on combating terrorism. Mr. Clarke has served in four White Houses, beginning with Ronald Reaganís Administration, and earned an impeccable record for his work.
Now the White House seeks to destroy his reputation. The people around the President arenít answering his allegations; instead, they are trying to use the same tactics they used with Paul OíNeill. They are trying to ridicule Mr. Clarke and destroy his credibility, and create any diversion possible to focus attention away from his serious allegations.
The purpose of government isnít to make the President look good. It isnít to produce propaganda or misleading information. It is, instead, to do its best for the American people and to be accountable to the American people.
The people around the President donít seem to believe that. They have crossed a line -- perhaps several lines -- that no government ought to cross.
We shouldnít fire or demean people for telling the truth. We shouldnít reveal the names of law enforcement officials for political gain. And we shouldnít try to destroy people who are out to make country safer.
I think the people around the President have crossed into dangerous territory. We are seeing abuses of power that cannot be tolerated.
The President needs to put a stop to it, right now. We need to get to the truth, and the President needs to help us do that.
A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION
Articles in the BuzzFlash Contributor section are posted as-is. Given the timeliness of some Contributor articles, BuzzFlash cannot verify or guarantee the accuracy of every word. We strive to correct inaccuracies when they are brought to our attention.
otherwise noted, all original