BuzzFlash Reader Commentary
November 17, 2003
CONTRIBUTOR ARCHIVES  
Support BuzzFlash
Get a copy of


MORE
BuzzFlash

INTERVIEWS

WORLD MEDIA WATCH

P.M. CARPENTER

MAUREEN FARRELL

BARBARA'S DAILY BUZZ

SOUTHERN STYLE

CARTOONS

THE ANGRY LIBERAL

EDITORIALS

CONTRIBUTORS

MAILBAG

PERSPECTIVES

ANALYSIS

NEWS ALERTS

LINK ARCHIVES

SEARCH

ABOUT

FAQ

Feel Safer Yet?

A BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY
by Bri Held

Dear Buzz:

So, if the world is "more peaceful and more free under my leadership," as Bush insists, then the following, demanded for Bush's three-day visit to Britain, is a little gratuitous, don't you think?:

"Closure of all London subway lines, widespread blocking of London streets, the patrolling of London skies by fighter jets and Black Hawk helicopters, a shoot-to-kill protestors order for American special agents and snipers WITH immunity against prosecution if they kill anyone, and the shipping in of battlefield weaponry to use on PROTESTORS...."
Democrats.com

Er... that battlefield weaponry would be:

" ....a piece of military hardware called a 'mini-gun', which usually forms part of the mobile armoury in the presidential cavalcade. It is fired from a tank and can kill dozens of people. One manufacturer's description reads: 'Due to the small calibre of the round, the mini-gun can be used practically anywhere."
The Guardian

Not to mention:

"They [the Americans] wanted blast-and bullet-proofed windows and curtains and some strengthening to the walls of the president's suite and other rooms at the palace where he would be spending time."
Washington Times

Oh and that's over and above:

" ...5,000 British police officers involved in the security operation for the president...."
Washington Times

Thank goodness the Queen refused to have Buckingham Palace torn up and re-structured for the cowardly demands of this Unelected (Chickenhawk) Fraud:

"Her majesty takes the view that no amount of strengthening of windows and walls could protect the president in such an eventuality [an airborne attack] and that the work would cause disruption and involve discarding original fixtures and fittings."
Washington Times

Unbelievable! How can Bush even possibly stand himself! Is he on the same stuff as Rush? This is the blowhard who swaggered "Bring 'em on!," yet doesn't even have the guts to face non-violent protestors for even one second:

"An internal memo sent to Cabinet Office staff and leaked to the press this weekend urged staff to work from home if at possible during the presidential visit. Serious disruption would be caused by 'the President Bush vehicle entourage requesting cleared secured vehicle routes around London and the security cordons creating a sterile zone around him'."
The Guardian

Mr. Bush, if this is the world that's "more peaceful and more free under [your] leadership," then stop the world, I want to get off!

Three days of Bush? God Save the Queen.

Bri Held

A BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY

BACK TO TOP  

Articles in the BuzzFlash Contributor section are posted as-is. Given the timeliness of some Contributor articles, BuzzFlash cannot verify or guarantee the accuracy of every word. We strive to correct inaccuracies when they are brought to our attention.

 
 
MEDIA WATCH
DAILY BUZZ
P.M. CARPENTER
MAUREEN FARRELL
CARTOONS
ANGRY LIBERAL
INTERVIEWS
SOUTHERN STYLE
CONTRIBUTORS
MAILBAG
EDITORIALS
ANALYSIS
ALERTS
PERSPECTIVES
ABOUT
SEARCH
MEDIA LINKS
HEADLINE ARCHIVES
HEADLINES
EMAIL BUZZFLASH
HELP KEEP BUZZFLASH BUZZ'N!
 

Unless otherwise noted, all original
content and headlines are © BuzzFlash.
Contact BuzzFlash for reprint rights.