|
Meditations
On a White House Yale Reunion, Hosted by the Model "Academically
Mediocre Son of a Wealthy Eastern Seabord WASP" Affirmative Action
Admission
Candidate
A BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY
Meditations
on a White House Reunion
(Or
How an Unabashed Left Liberal from the Yale Class of ‘68
Was Mindlessly Sucked Up into the Hoopla of the George W. Bush White
House Reunion Only to Be Regurgitated into the Harsh and Painful Reality
of the Radical Right Bush World View)
by
Allan N. Karlin Yale '68
On
Thursday night, May 29, the Yale Class of 1968 congregated at the
White House, the temporary home of George W. Bush, its most famous
(or infamous) member, for their 35th Reunion. More than 450 classmates
and an equal number of spouses, children or other guests spent more
than four hours sharing memories and nostalgia as they ate and drank
their way through the Rose Garden and the first two floors of the White
House. Among them was the author, a confirmed Bush detractor, who had
come to the White House believing himself immune to the rumored Bush
charisma, to see what a Bush event looked like from the inside out
and, instead, found himself seduced (or perhaps duped) into admiring
Bush’s personal skills as the allure of the Bush White House
momentarily confounded his good judgment and befuddled his common sense.
The
Bush Reunion Event was not without controversy among Yale ‘68ers,
many of whom would have preferred to visit a White House occupied by
Al Gore, a graduate (ironically) of Harvard, not Yale, or perhaps one
occupied by John Kerry, another Yale Grad who, unlike Bush, has a resume
that actually qualifies him for the job. Earlier in May, news articles
and columnists quoted several of Bush’s classmates who refused,
for political reasons, to attend any reunion hosted by a man that some
considered a national disgrace. Doonesbury, the creation of a Yalie
with a sense of social justice, Garry Trudeau (Class of 1970), spent
the week of the Reunion skewering Bush and his Reunion, reminding its
readers that Bush’s Yale experience had less to do with the Spirit
of 1968 than with the party-hearty tradition of his fraternity brothers
in DKE.
Classmates used the class listserve to exchange messages from, on
the one hand, those who advocated attendance at what they naively perceived
to be an apolitical class reunion and, on the other hand, those who
passionately believed that their attendance would lend credibility
to yet another George Bush/Karl Rove photo-op for an administration
that stood for the antithesis of a Yale education. Indeed, one writer,
explaining why he would not attend, noted that his wife had promised
she would puke on the White House lawn if they went to the Reunion.
For
this Alum, the Reunion started earlier in the day as he joined ‘68ers
from Davenport, Bush’s residential college at Yale, for lunch
at the Cosmos Club. As members of the same residential college as Bush,
Davenporters had apparently earned the right to learn important and
intimate knowledge of the mature George W. Bush from a White House
insider (and fellow member of the Class of ‘68). Following a
lunch of sandwiches and chips, our insider offered us his “Perspectives
from the White House,” a series of anecdotes designed to assure
us that, whatever else had become of George W. Bush, he was still the
same good old boy with the same good old “swagger” that
we remembered from Yale. The insider, offering us a personal view of
Bush lore, recounted Bush’s response when asked if the now famous “cod
piece” in the flight suit he had worn for his aircraft carrier
landing came with the suit or whether it was made specially for Bush.
At
first, or so the story goes, Bush replied to the question about the
cod piece by reminding his friend about “the importance of
marketing.” Then, when the friend repeated his cod piece question,
our Machismo President responded that what appeared down below (presumably
in the vicinity of the cod piece) was really all his. While this may
have convinced some that the President was quite a cool guy, it left
others convinced that Bush has more going for him below the waist than
above the neck.
The
same insider moved on to a story that allegedly demonstrated our
former classmates’ true intelligence, recounting how Bush
always asked the smartest questions at every White House meeting. Once,
he explained, Bush even asked folks from the Department of Defense
to state the Department’s purpose -- allegedly confirming that
Bush had asked a truly profound question, but leading at least one
listener to conclude that Bush, having perhaps day dreamed through
more than one social studies class, just didn’t know the right
answer.
Before
the speaker finished, he suggested that Bush was a man who recognized
his own weaknesses, describing how the President once had
someone assemble a videotape of his parade of rather creative abuses
of the English language during the 2000 electoral campaign. Watching
the video with friends, Bush commented, “How did the American
people ever elect me?” (In a spirit of civility, no one pointed
out that the American people had not, in fact, done so.)
Just
as I wondered whether anyone was actually reassured by these Tales
of the Fatuous Dubya, one classmate rose to tell the speaker “how
proud we all were that George Bush was our president,” accompanied
by a round of applause. Go figure! We had just heard a series of anecdotes
demonstrating conclusively that the leader of the free world had not
matured, emotionally or intellectually, much beyond the swaggering
frat guy we knew (or knew of) at Yale and here we were, most – but
not all – of us applauding. Were we taken in by this contrived
glimpse into the soul of the real Dubya? Did we really think that a
president who asks the purpose of the Defense Department, while sending
our soldiers to war in Iraq, is worthy of celebration? Or were we just
a group of successful Yalies, who had come of age in the sixties believing
we should “ask what we can do for our country,” but who
now appreciated a president who assured us that it was OK to “ask
only what our country can do for us?”
The
Reunion for the entire class began toward 6 p.m. The evening, for
which guests paid $150 each to the Reunion Committee, began with
George and Laura Bush personally greeting each guest (although some
observed that Laura Bush looked as if she would rather have been somewhere
else). Here, even this hard core Bush detractor found himself marveling
at his initial reaction to the real Dubya. As I approached Bush, my
every instinct reminded me that this was a president I abhorred. Yet,
up close and personal, I found myself noting that the smirk that some
of us swear we see on TV was gone. The eyes were warm. The smile seemed
genuine as Bush reached out to shake each hand. The only flash of the
rumored temper may have occurred when this former classmate greeted
Bush by asking if he read Doonesbury. The eyes flashed and Bush snapped
a decisive and not too friendly “No!” before recovering
quickly and asking what Doonesbury was saying about him. I demurred.
After all, I thought, this was an event on Bush turf played by Bush
rules.
As
the evening progressed, it became apparent that, for many in attendance,
the Reunion was less a photoop for Bush than a photo-op for those seeking
a picture with Bush. (Wow, me and Dubya together, his arms on my shoulders,
wait until they see this at the office.) While no photos were allowed
in the reception line, Bush went upstairs after welcoming his classmates,
sang with Yale’s most famous singing group, the Whiffenpoofs
(“we’re poor little lambs who’ve lost our way, baa,
baa, baa”), and then spent the next several hours appearing to
revel in the evening as he signed autographs and posed endlessly for
pictures with whomever succeeded in pushing their way into the vortex
of classmates, children and spouses that whirled around him. In the
center of that vortex, he smiled and joked and moved his arms effortlessly
from one set of shoulders to another as the flashbulbs sparkled continuously
around him.
And
why shouldn’t he be reveling in the evening. There he was,
larger than on TV, the frat-rat with the C average welcoming all of
his classmates to his home, reminding them that whatever he (and they)
had achieved at Yale, no one had outperformed him in the years since
graduation. So what if Bush thought that nuclear energy was nucular
energy and so what if he could not pronounce a plethora of other commonly
understood words in the English language; he still had the coolest
house of anyone in the Class of ‘68.
Even
some of those who believed themselves immune to the Bush charm found
themselves afflicted by a hallucinatory madness probably induced
by an invitation to the White House from its seemingly likeable (although
politically dangerous) occupant. One Yale spouse, an unrepentant liberal
Democrat, found herself sucked in the gravitational pull of the congenial
looking Bush: “If I set my liberal politics aside, would you
pose for a picture with me Mr. President?” she asked. “You
don’t have to set your politics aside for a photo with me,” Bush
responded. Adding, “you can vote for whoever you want,” before
smiling for yet one more photo.
And
at the earlier luncheon, one ‘68er expressed his personal
concern about the safety of his daughter who was about to begin a job
in the Middle East and asked the insider a question about Middle East
policy. Later that evening, this same classmate and his wife lined
up to flow through the receiving line and exchange greetings with Bush
and his First Lady. When they reached Bush, to their surprise, he singled
them out. Already briefed on the events of the afternoon, Bush personally
assured them that their daughter would be safe. Moved by his words,
the classmate’s wife responded “You can’t know how
much this means to me.” Bush, placing his arms around the worried
parents, replied, “It means a lot to me too.”
How
could Bush possibly assure the safety of any American in Israel in
the coming months? Wasn’t this a bit hypocritical since Bush
spent the first two years of his administration doing little or nothing
to stop Israelis and Palestinians from killing each other? Oh well,
whatever the reality of the Bush comments, it was, on this night, trumped
by the illusion of Bush gesture. (Indeed, when I visited a friend in
New York, 10 days later, she recounted the story of Bush and my classmate's
daughter having heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend and
so it goes. The story had already traveled from Washington to the West
Coast to New York, a legend in the making.) The United States Supreme
Court is not the only reason why George W. Bush is now the president.
So
what did Yale Class of ‘68 really think of Bush? Many who
are successes in business, medicine and other lucrative fields, undoubtedly
respect, support and vote for this Guru of the Infinite Tax Cut who
assures them that fawning over their self-interest is an act of patriotism.
Yet others disagree. Yale has produced Bush, but it had also produced
Kerry, Doonesbury, and -- to a degree -- Oliver Stone. One classmate,
who applauded Bush at the luncheon admitted that he disagreed with
75% of what Bush stood for.” (So why did he applaud?) Later,
I approached another group of classmates who were watching Bush from
a distance. When asked what they thought of him, one quickly gave him
a firm thumbs down. Yet, there we were, all together, Bush fans and
Bush detractors, watching a parade of classmates push their way into
the crowd for a photo with a man whose personal congeniality masks
a dark and dangerous political agenda.
I
stood there admiring the social skills of Yale’s greatest
Fraternity President, but then reality struck. Damn reality. How can
any of us, well-educated Yale graduates, pretend to admire the personal
skills of a man who is laying waste to our government and doing so
with a smile? After all, this congenial man is the same Bush who is
willing to rally the world around his personal war in Iraq by apparently
misrepresenting intelligence on the “weapons of mass destruction” and
who dares to risk alienating allies by adopting arrogance as a primary
principle of American foreign policy. The same Bush who thinks that “promote
the public welfare” means promote the welfare of the wealthy
and who panders to the fundamentalist right. The same Bush who seems
to assume that environmentalism is an anachronism, that the primary
victims of racism are white, and that John Ashcroft is part of a divine
plan to eviscerate the Bill of Rights. And so it goes.
But
then, what else can we expect from Bush? Admitted to Yale as an affirmative
action candidate under the legacy quota, Bush’s
full-time responsibilities to his fraternity brothers (scheduling beer
runs and making sure the parties started on time) prevented him from
joining some of his classmates working with poor African American children
in the neighborhoods of New Haven, attending teach-ins or demonstrating
against the Vietnam War. Later, he was too busy pursuing money losing
oil ventures, bankrolled by family friends, to find the time to join
the Peace Corps or VISTA or otherwise learn how so much of the rest
of the world lives and suffers. When other classmates were teaching
in the poorest public schools to avoid the draft or considering fleeing
to Canada, he was stuck in a special National Guard unit, bypassing
other applicants who had been on the list for years. No wonder he lives
in a world so different from so many of us. He is a child of the privileged
and yet underprivileged elite whose limited life experiences leave
them culturally disabled in an increasingly complicated world. Poor,
misunderstood guy.
As
I wandered through the Rose Garden and I imagined seeing Al Gore,
or was it Martin Sheen, standing in the Oval Office, the seductive
magic of the Bush personality began to fade. As the evening moved toward
its end, I contemplated the immense disconnect between the appealing
illusions engendered by the Bush congeniality and the dangerous future
engendered by the Bush reality. And I hoped that others of my political
persuasion would leave the image of the likeable Dubya behind them
when they left the White House, recalling the words of the liberal
Democrat who earlier posed for a presidential photo: “Vote for
him? Never. I do have my standards.”
A BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY |