To
whom it may concern,
Recently
Trent Lott was repudiated by the White House, and forced down from
his position as Majority Leader in the US Senate, for having publicly
endorsed the policy of racial segregation. At Strom Thurmond's
100th birthday party on Dec. 5, Lott, praising the old guest of
honor, made these now-notorious remarks: "I want to say this
about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president we voted
for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had
of followed our lead we wouldn't of had all these problems over
all these years, either."
A
lifelong opponent of the civil rights movement, Sen. Lott had said
such things before. This time was different, however, because Lott
made that ill-considered statement at a function covered by C-SPAN.
The resulting furor cost him heavily, despite all his excuses and
apologies. " Segregation forever!" had been Thurmond's
platform back in 1948. So egregious was Lott's praise for it that
the Republicans themselves-led, eventually, by Pres. Bush-were
forced to turn against him. He had few defenders; Jesse Helms was
one of them.
I
have no doubt that Pfizer's management was in complete agreement
with the president when, on Dec. 12, he pointedly rebuked the senator: "Any
suggestion that the segregated past was acceptable or positive
is offensive, and it is wrong," Bush said, to great applause. "Recent
comments by Senator Lott do not reflect the spirit of our country." Assuming
that you share the president's enlightened view, I find it odd,
and more than troubling, that Pfizer is a sponsor of Rush Limbaugh's
program-a frequent source of commentary even uglier than the senator's.
Indeed,
Limbaugh has made statements very similar to Lott's. When Thurmond
once referred to a gay soldier as "not normal," Limbaugh
thus defended him: "He's not encumbered by being politically
correct.... If you want to know what America used to be-and a lot
of people wish it still were-then you listen to Strom Thurmond." By "used
to be," Limbaugh clearly meant the days before the passage
of the Voting Rights Act, the days when schools were segregated,
polling places were frequently off-limits to black people, and
lynch mobs had their way throughout the South.
That
was by no means Limbaugh's only racist outburst. Such comments
have in fact been commonplace throughout his long and loud career. "Take
that bone out of your nose and call me back," he once snapped
at a black caller. Later, he once mused on the air: "Have
you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals
resemble Jesse Jackson?" He has routinely slandered not just
Jackson but the NAACP and black Americans in general. To a caller
who once insisted that black people have a right to be heard, he
replied: "They are 12 percent of the population! Who the hell
cares?"
I
could come up with many similar examples-and, as well, with many
equally offensive statements about other groups and individuals:
women, gays, Democrats, immigrants, the poor. Limbaugh is, moreover,
a veritable fount of dangerous claptrap on subjects of all kinds,
from the US Constitution to the world economy, from HIV to global
warming. And he has sometimes strayed from mere falsehood to outright
provocation, not-so-subtly urging his listeners to take violent
action on behalf of their political beliefs.
Rush
Limbaugh is, in short, a public menace-a figure just as poisonous,
in his own way, as any outright neo-Nazi, Klan apologist or, for
that matter, Islamist or Afrocentrist agitator. The difference
is, of course, that Limbaugh's voice is heard from coast to coast
day after day, and has the blessing of some powerful politicians.
And he enjoys such influence in part because of Pfizer's sponsorship.
I'm sure that, if your board members and shareholders knew more
about the content of his broadcasts, they would object to your
support for him, and urge you to suspend it.
Thank
you for your time and attention.
Sincerely,
Mark
Crispin Miller