More Tax Cuts for the Rich
BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY
by Edward
B. Winslow
The
president’s $600 billion tax cut, which follows on the heels of his $1.35
trillion tax cut for the very rich, is unveiled amid great fanfare of
an economic stimulus.
In
reality, this new proposal, which calls for an end to federal income taxes
on stock dividends, is yet another giveaway to the very rich. This new
proposal to shift the wealth from the middle class and the poor to the
richest Americans will do little to stimulate economic growth. What's
more, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that this
fiasco is going to increase the flow of red ink in the U.S. budget deficit
to more than $200 billion. That doesn't include the estimated $100 billion
to $200 billion for Bush's war on Iraq.
The
Bush proposal is class warfare on the weakest sectors of America's socioeconomic
strata. "When they direct their tax programs to benefit the very, very,
very few and eliminate the majority from any benefit of these tax cuts,
it is class war," said Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.).
The
poor don't own stocks, so they will see no benefit in the centerpiece
of Bush's most recent effort to give more to the rich. Economists report
that more than half of the benefits of eliminating the tax on stock dividends
would flow to only 5 percent of taxpayers. What the rich don't pay in
taxes, the middle class and the poor must pay. The alternative is a reduction
in needed services and investments in our nation's infrastructure. But
the callous attitude of the extreme right-wing in our country calls to
mind the Charles Dickens character, who said the poor should simply die
and reduce the surplus population.
While
the administration touts the benefits to stock prices, and rich stock
investors start pouring the champagne, many economists say the tax cut
would not help business or consumer spending. Bush proposes a meager increase
in the childcare tax credit from $600 to $1,000 that will do little for
families who are struggling in the failed economic problems of an administration
whose sole effort is to help the rich take more from the poor and middle
class. Nearly a quarter of a century ago George Herbert Walker Bush described
these failed policies as voodoo economics. He was right, yet the oligarchy
continues to force these ill-advised programs down the throat of the American
people.
While
more liberal voices decry the Bush tax cut for the rich as unfair, even
some conservatives have expressed dismay. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.),
who voted against Bush's $1.35 trillion tax cut in 2001 because it was
"too tilted" toward the rich commented, "I think it's very important that
we give low-income Americans a break."
If
the administration were really interested in doing something to jump-start
the nation's economy, it would offer incentives to small business owners.
These people are the backbone of the American economy. People who own
vast amounts of corporate stock look to dividends as an income stream,
and do not have the need or the motivation to risk these resources. It's
the entrepreneur who has fewer than 100 employees that generate new jobs
and business expansion. How about doing something that gives these men
and women incentives to create new jobs and new services?
Furthermore,
investment tax credits could be given to homeowners and builders who invest
in energy efficient construction. Buyers and manufacturers of energy efficient
cars and trucks could be rewarded by tax-saving incentives.
These
ideas don't require a vast knowledge of economic theory, only a real desire
to get the economy moving again without further shifting the nation's
wealth from those who have less to those who have more.
(This
commentary contains the writer's opinions. Edward B. Winslow is a freelance
writer, who can be reached at edwardwinslow@attbi.com.)
A
BUZZFLASH READER COMMENTARY
|