|
Iraq's
#1 Problem(s)
by
P.M. Carpenter
Watching
the truth unfold is almost comical. No unwholesome weapons, no bug-filled
canisters, no imminent threats, no grave or gathering anything
except Saddam Hussein's pixilation. Turns out that while St. George the
tyrant slayer was hornswoggling the world about Babylon's frightful menace,
the swarthy Führer was writing novels. The Bush administration got everything wrong. Whatever intelligence
findings weren't dead wrong on arrival, the White House soon perverted.
The inevitable cover-up, starting at the posterior position, now dominates
the news, yet Bush II's prewar wantonness is obscuring the predictable
tragedy of Iraq's postwar predicament.
The country is a political basket case, a condition guaranteed by its
occupier's rush to war and hasty map redrawing. That things are bad in
Iraq is a given; just how bad they'll yet become is the question.
What is now clear is that beyond their vague assurances of smiling and
cheering liberated hordes, supposedly big-picture neocons had no clue
about a postwar Iraq. When the scattered cheers turned to deadly ambushes,
suicide bombings and a climbing American death toll, the administration
cooked up plans to cut and run -- a.s.a.p. A messy Iraq was messing up
the smooth road to reelection at home.
The scheme hatched by Bush II to thrust governing authority back into
Iraqi hands before the invasion dust settles is a complex, multi-step
caucus process that makes Iowa's look like a model of simplicity. The
administration's plan has a lot of problems, the #1 problem being that
the plan won't work.
For starters, it denies citizen participation in choosing a new government,
and right off the bat the truly astute saw this as a snag for democracy.
Among them is the Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, Iraq's most influential
Shiite, who really, really prefers direct elections and majority rule
over convoluted caucuses and minority-rights protections.
Which creates an additional #1 problem. Sunni Arabs don't like the idea
of seething Shiites dominating Iraq's new government -- not hard to comprehend
when one considers that Sunnis have spent the better part of 20 years
killing said Shiites.
Then there's the #1 problem of the Kurds. They'll likely get abused
no matter what happens in whichever electoral process is chosen or forced,
ensuring even greater #1 problems -- such as separatism -- shortly down
the road. But at least that's another day.
Right now we face the #1 problem of a divided Iraqi Governing Council
having to delay writing an interim constitution. That document would
have opened the way for the administration-desired June 30 transfer of
power, but other pressing #1 problems of council infighting over election
procedures and a lack of voter rolls to even stage elections have somewhat
overshadowed the first #1 problem.
Nevertheless, having already fled Iraq because of the then-#1 problem
of uncontrolled violence, the United Nations plans to step in at Ayatollah
Sistani's request to determine if hurried elections are indeed possible
before a hurried transfer of power. The U.N.'s involvement is welcome,
said Iraq's interior minister last week, assuming -- you guessed it --
the now-#1 problem of continuing violence doesn't preclude any possibility
of elections to begin with.
Today's problems, however, should not depress. Just stay tuned. Tomorrow's
will be much worse. In fostering a balkanized Iraq and thereby further
destabilizing an already explosive Middle East, the Bush administration
is proving its prewar incompetence and cluelessness were mere dress rehearsals
for the postwar era.
Naturally, the administration will attempt to correct course by raising
more money for its reelection campaign. Meanwhile, its more vocal supporters
will concentrate on pointing fingers at everyone except those in charge.
Their combined hope -- their only hope -- is that American democracy is
as lame as that which they have unloaded on Iraq.
|