|
"Mr.
Rove, anything else we can do for you?"
by
P.M. Carpenter
Oh, how today's Democratic pols make one long for the era of smoke-filled
rooms and corrupt bargains. Perhaps the bygone focus leaned a bit too
heavy on the equitable distribution of graft and patronage rather than
the best nominee, but on the upside, party bosses didn't spend their
time writing splendid ads for the Republican National Committee. Times
have changed. In pursuit of the party's highest nomination -- a rather dubious prize
in ‘04, you must admit -- Democratic hopefuls are mauling one of their
own, along with any hope of a unified, coherent message. Karl Rove can
save a bundle on opposition research and focus-grouped lines of attack.
Democrats are doing the work for him.
First, they're making sure the primary season is as bloody as possible.
That, of course, is not a difficult task for cannibalistic Democrats,
especially since this time around there happens to be a front-runner
with a knack for making himself an easy target. Both his status and vulnerability
stem from the same root: he speaks his mind. Voters like a politician
who speaks his mind, hence it's no surprise the mind-speaker happens
to be the front-runner as well. But he is saying things both logical
and true without much diplomatic adornment, which can be a career-ending
liability in the people-metered minefield of politics. (By the way, before
you write to skewer me for pimping one candidate or slamming others,
let's be clear. I have no dog in this fight. I'm too busy worrying about
something the president calls threatening "nucular" programs abroad.)
Most recently the front-runner said America is no safer as a result
of Saddam Hussein's capture. Not one whit of evidence exists to substantiate
what W. is hyping as a safer-America victory -- indeed, terrorist plots
and terrorist acts continue unabated. In fact, the capture was little
more than a feel-good moment, a rousing 48-hour news cycle of patriotic
delirium costing merely a few hundred American lives, roughly $170 billion,
education and health care at home, international respect and goodwill,
traditional allies and, apparently, any reasonable expectation that the
President of the United States should be honest with the nation.
In a forced twist of logic, however, somewhat-sort-of-pro-war Democratic
candidates latched onto the bagging of Saddam as a vindication of their
war-resolution votes. Not much of a vindication, but it's the only one
they have. They are buying into W's P.R. fantasy only because it's good
and available cover.
The behind-runners know that better than anyone, but what the hell.
The capture was a perfect moment to denounce the front-runner's loose
lips and deficient spine. Anything for a bump in Iowa. That's as superficial
as politics gets -- and meat for Rove's Democratic grinder.
The second reason for Mr. Rove's life of ease these days -- the more
problematic and fundamental one -- is all too familiar. The Democratic
Party has no central message, no theme, no focus. And so much of the
primary season's squabbling reveals just that.
Republicans
thrive on wondrous simplicity: tax cuts ad nauseam and a testosterone-pumped
foreign policy. Even though the executed message
guarantees looming American disasters -- dysfunctional government, crushing
debt and crippling global alienation -- the electorate opts for the message
largely because ... well, there is one. The message is clear. It is comprehensible.
It is supremely simple.
Yet Democrats seem to miss the simplicity behind W's success, and have
forgotten as well the similar key behind Bill Clinton's earlier success:
Everything was the economy. If you asked Bill about foreign policy, global
warming, health care, education, crime, Gennifer Flowers or for the time
of day, you got the economy.
Important historical note: Bill Clinton won.
Quickly now, name the Democratic message today.
Stumped?
Karl Rove isn't.
|