|
Springtime
for Pfizer
by
P.M. Carpenter Way back before July, 1965, before the socialist monster of Medicare
terrorized seniors with guaranteed health care, conservatives told horror
stories about it 'round the political campfire. Ronald Reagan -- by then
a long-time peddler of GE toasters, Borax and right-wing Arizonans --
typified the sentiment. Medicare, he admonished, would so encroach on
"freedom in this country" we’d be left to wile away our autumn years
"telling our children and our children’s children what it was like in
America when men were free."
The rhetoric was, at best, silly. But at least in that era conservatives
professed their convictions with some semblance of probity: that is,
through a filter of clinical paranoia untreated by slick mass-marketing
consultants. From every hilltop GOPers unabashedly rang the alarm of
domestic Bolsheviks plotting to enslave the populace with social compassion.
People politely listened, then promptly dismissed Republicanism in droves.
The good old days. Republican pols were honest -- hence a minority.
Things are of course different now, though Medicare remains every bit
the bugaboo. The right has always belittled government’s ability to get
anything right or do anything right, promoting free-market options as
better and cheaper. Unlike the Pentagon, which has a habit of misplacing
a few billion here and a few billion there with impunity, Medicare forever
has been under an intensive conservative microscope and equally intensive
criticism.
Yet time has shown these selective fiscal watchdogs that, left to its
own devices, for-profit health care simply cannot deliver as efficiently
as government. Just compare Medicare’s administrative costs to any HMO,
or consider studies that show seniors with private health plans are less
satisfied with their care than their Medicare counterparts. That factual
history lesson is more than a thorn in conservatives’ side; it’s a dagger
in their ideological heart.
Their response? A curious, dishonest and misnamed tour de force of cognitive
dissonance: the Medicare "drug" bill. In brief, to eviscerate a social
program that has worked well for nearly 40 years, laissez-faire conservatives
have set out, in effect, to socialize -- or to put it euphemistically,
welfare-capitalize -- the dickens out of private health care alternatives.
It seems our American Tories believe only socialist ripostes can slay
the demon of social equity.
So much for living up to the courage of one’s convictions.
Indeed, the Medicare bill is a study in ideological contradictions,
public policy time-bombs and negative consequences that are anything
but unintended. It allots a whopping 30 percent more of your money on
privately covered seniors than otherwise would be spent through Medicare.
To pay for massive HMO subsidies, the bill robs many of the elderly poor
of Medicaid’s "wrap-around" protection. While it covers less than one-fourth
of the elderly’s prescription costs (according to the Center on Budget
and Policy Priorities), the bill lavishes mountains of cash on already
profit-gorged and politically sheltered drug companies by barring Medicare
from the free-market practice of negotiating volume buys. And in permitting
private health-plan "cherry picking," the bill leaves Medicare with the
sickest population and its recipients with skyrocketing premiums.
You can almost hear the kaboom.
The deathblow will come when Medicare is in shambles and the federal
deficit too bloated to do anything about it. (Say, what a coincidence
that will be.) It’ll be closed-for-business time, as well as time for
crocodile conservative tears over "socialized medicine" having always
been doomed to fail.
Meanwhile, there’s that one inconvenient fact that must stick in the
craw of every conservative who sired the drug-bill stalking-horse. Medicare
is among the most efficacious social programs ever. The contemporary
right won’t stand for that, so it’s out for blood -- out-Medicaring Medicare
with perverse welfare-capitalist tricks that would make bygone conservatives
heave.
|