|
Capitol
Buzz
From
Capitol Hill to BuzzFlash.com
by
Anonymous
June
5, 2002
Who
am I?
Let
me introduce myself. I am a partisan Democrat who has something to say.
And as a senior staffer on Capitol Hill, I have a perspective that may
be different than the one provided by the mainstream media. But, due to
my position, I run the risk of my views being attributed to my employer.
So, I offer this anonymously-written weekly column and speak only for
myself.
*
* *
Phoenix
Memo Fallout
by Anonymous
A
remarkable turnabout occurred on Capitol Hill in the wake of the disclosure
of the Phoenix memo, a pre-9/11 document that encouraged FBI officials
to examine why alleged terrorists were being trained at U.S. flight schools.
House Democratic Leader Richard A. Gephardt has been criticized by members
of his Democratic caucus for being far too deferential to the President
after September 11. Suddenly, after the Phoenix memo was leaked to the
Washington Post, the lion roared: "What we have to do now
is to find out what the President, what the White House, knew about the
events leading up to 9/11, when they knew it and, most importantly, what
was done about it at the time."
This
was precisely the wrong question to ask and is the primary cause of the
Democratic loss of the Phoenix memo spin war. It also has set back Democrats
who want to ask the real questions about Bush's war on terror.
The
media played rope-a-dope, pouncing on Gephardt's questions, which clearly
implied that the White House or President could have prevented 9/11, but
failed to do so. We all know that Bush was on vacation at the "Western
White House," more commonly known as "cowboy camp," as
the memo rolled in. And that may have had something to do with the lack
of attention given to it. But never ones to give Democrats a break, the
press decided to make the Democrats prove the impossible: that Bush knew
the attacks were coming and did nothing about it. Facing this onslaught,
within three days, Gephardt was in full retreat on Fox News Sunday: "I
never, ever, ever thought that anybody, including the president, did anything
up to September 11th other than their best."
Total
nonsense. Did the FBI do its best? Did Ashcroft do his best when he refused
the FBI's request for additional counter-terrorism funding? Did the CIA
do its best when it failed to share information with other federal agencies
on two of the 9/11 hijackers? Did Bush do his best when he thought the
best use of federal law enforcement resources was shutting down medicinal
marijuana clubs? The list goes on and on.
A
popular parlor game on the Hill has been to watch the jousting of Gephardt
and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle as both gear up for Presidential
runs, with most members giving Daschle an edge. In this instance Daschle
again showed that his political instincts were sharper than those of his
House counterpart, when he asked "[w]hy did it take eight months
for us to receive this information?" That is the question that bears
asking over and over. If anything will be the undoing of this Administration,
it is its penchant for hiding the truth from the American people.
And
there are other questions as well. Why is it that Democrats are "unpatriotic"
and "unfair" in questioning the Bush Administration's readiness
for 9/11, but it was fair game for Ashcroft to threaten Senate Judiciary
Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy with responsibility for future terrorist
attacks unless he capitulated to the Administration's version of the Patriot
Act? When does the "war" end? When it does, can it be considered
a success, especially in light of the escape of Osama Bin Laden and many
of his top aides? Who is running our nation's foreign policy, Colin Powell
and Condoleeza Rice or Karl Rove (all three were present during the President's
recent European foreign policy swing)?
And
what about the FBI? Not reported was the fact that FBI Director Robert
Mueller's plan to reform the FBI called for consolidation of anti-terror
efforts at FBI headquarters and Ashcroft's guidelines called for dispersal
of authority to local offices. Even now, does this Administration have
its act together?
And
what about former FBI Director Louis Freeh? It was under his watch that
the FBI slid even further into incompetence and careerism. Freeh was too
busy playing patty-cake with Republicans on the Hill in their various
attacks on President Clinton. I was recently told by a high ranking law
enforcement official, that it was the Director's copy of the LaBella memorandum
(which urged the appointment of an independent counsel to investigate
Vice President Gore about alleged campaign finance improprieties) that
was leaked to the Los Angeles Times during the 2000 Presidential
election.
And
what about the Congress? The House Committee on the Judiciary, which is
entrusted with oversight of most counter-terrorism activities, took a
pass on any oversight of these agencies for the past several years, choosing
instead to impeach President Clinton.
And
finally, what about the press? Their obsession with getting Bill Clinton
on oral sex and twenty-year-old land deals stood in the way of reporting
on matters involving life and death. And with Chandra Levy, Robert Blake,
Michael Skakel, et al., here they go again.
*
* *
|