A BUZZFLASH READER CONTRIBUTION
by Tom Wieliczka

As we sadly see that the 4,000th American Soldier has died in Iraq, I feel it is my duty to reveal to the American Public just how UNconcerned the American Media, especially The New York Times, is about the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars.

Greg Mitchell's book proves these facts.

Recently we had Bush tell the American soldiers and Afghanistan citizens, via a teleconference, that he thought war was "exciting" and "romantic." I searched the NY Times (America's Newspaper of Record) for these quotes and did not find a word about it reported.

Below is my letter to the NY Times Public Editor along with the reply I received from him. Brace yourself in your chair as you read how Mr Perez-Pena does not think this is newsworthy.

To: The NY Times Public Editor

Dear Mr Perez-Pena,

Why hasn't the media been reporting a single word of Bush's astonishing comments to the soldiers in Afghanistan?

The Australian press reported the following [1] back on the 14th of this month.

President Bush spoke of his dream to work on the frontline in Afghanistan during a video conference with U.S. military and civilian personnel in the war-torn country.

"I must say, I'm a little envious," Bush said.

"If I were slightly younger and not employed here, I think it would be a fantastic experience to be on the front lines of helping this young democracy succeed.

"It must be exciting for you ... in some ways romantic, in some ways, you know, confronting danger. You're really making history, and thanks," President Bush said.

To hear Bush say that war is ROMANTIC and EXCITING and he wishes he were young enough, after he went AWOL in Vietnam, is a slap in the face of the soldiers who have served.

VoteVets.org has comments by retired soldiers that are in no way complementary of the president's comments. And yet, the networks and newspapers in this county continue to mute these comments on the fifth anniversary of the Iraq War.

VoteVets Replies are at: http://www.votevets.org/news?id=0110 [2]

I suggest you do a search of various MSM Internet sites and major newspapers with the search parameters of:

Bush Afghanistan Romantic Exciting

and you will not get any hits (or very few), including the New York Times.

Tom Wieliczka
Windsor Locks, CT

The NY Times Reply

From: readerservice@nytimes.com
Date: Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23373396-2,00.html

Mr. Wieliczka,

I wasn't aware of this episode until I saw your message. And I don't know the thinking of the editors here or elsewhere in not reporting it. But I would offer a few observations.

It seems that only one reporter was allowed to observe this event and had any direct knowledge of what was said - a reporter from the Reuters news service.

Bush wasn't just speaking to soldiers, and apparently, he wasn't referring to combat. Here is the text of the first few paragraphs of the Reuters article:

U.S. President George W. Bush got an earful on Thursday about problems and progress in Afghanistan where a war has dragged on for more than six years but been largely eclipsed by Iraq.

In a videoconference, Bush heard from U.S. military and civilian personnel about the challenges ranging from fighting local government and police corruption to persuading farmers to abandon a lucrative poppy drug trade for other crops.

Bush heard tales of all-night tea drinking sessions to coax local residents into cooperating, and of tribesmen crossing mountains to attend government meetings seen as building blocks for the country's democracy-in-the-making.

"I must say, I'm a little envious," Bush said. "If I were slightly younger and not employed here, I think it would be a fantastic experience to be on the front lines of helping this young democracy succeed."

I would argue that that this is not news. You may see this as absurd, hypocritical fantasy, and as such, if he were a new president about whom we knew little, with many years ahead of him, his words would be worth noting. But this is a lame-duck president with less than a year left in office, who I would guess has said many things that you object to equally (if not more). His statements in that conference are of no particular significance, they reflect no new policy.

The media are generally not paying a lot of attention to Bush, focusing instead on the people who are competing to succeed him.

It is possible that a lot of editors, perusing the wires that day, would not have noticed this particular Reuters story. Also note that the words "exciting" and "romantic" don't appear until well into the story. Even those editors who noted the story could easily have missed that part.

- Richard Perez-Pena

A BUZZFLASH READER CONTRIBUTION

Tom Wieliczka
Windsor Locks, CT

Technorati Tags: Reader Contribution [7] Tom Wieliczka [8] George W. Bush [9] Iraq [10] Afghanistan [11] The New York Times [12] newsworthy [13]