Obama: Richardson Fits the Bill

BE ELECTED
by Meg White

It's a long weekend, thanks to a politically-themed holiday, and Congress is out of session. News is slow...time to speculate! Of course, everyone's favorite topic is the choice for Sen. Barack Obama's running mate.

There are too many names to list them all, so I'll tell you about my favorite: New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson. He's got both executive and foreign policy experience, he's likable, he's Hispanic...need I say more? Apparently, yes.

Susan Albright's extensive article on MinnPost Tuesday about possible choices for a vice presidential pick starts off with a picture of Obama and Richardson captioned: "Might Obama look to his one-time opponents, like New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson?" However, she doesn't really talk about Richardson as a possibility, except to say that he's been considered in a similar analysis by Peter Keating.

Keating included this biography of Richardson:

Governor Bill Richardson (New Mexico)
Google Meter*: 465,000
Age: 60
Religion: Roman Catholic
Education: B.A. (French and Political Science), Tufts; M.A. (International Affairs), Tufts
Pros: Popular governor of a swing state that George W. Bush carried in 2004; Hispanic; crossed the Clintons to endorse Obama at a key moment of the campaign; international negotiator who has won the release of prisoners in hot spots from Cuba to North Korea; immensely charming.
Cons: Fairly terrible on TV; never caught fire with voters in 2008; uncertain influence among Hispanics outside New Mexico; Diane Denish, his lieutenant governor, said in 2005 that she tried not to stand or sit next to him because he touched her too much, including on the hip, thigh and "sort of the side of my leg."

* Keating explains the Google Meter as "the number of hits you get if you enter the candidate's name, "Barack Obama" and "vice-president" into Google."

Albright is in good company. Most of the media has forgotten Richardson was once at the top of their lists (though I'm not alone in my assertion. There‘s even a whole blog dedicated to the notion of Richardson-as-vice-prez, though the last entry was more than two weeks ago).

The most common objection is that he's sloppy. His beard is scruffy and his clothes are often casual and rumpled. But wouldn't that be a good influence on a candidate like Obama, who has been accused to being too polished?

His loyalty to Obama was starkly displayed when he endorsed the Illinois Senator after dropping out, despite his ties to the Clintons. Any Hillary supporter who's willing to forgive Obama will also forgive Richardson, and having a guy who served in Bill Clinton's White House could be a draw for that crowd.

Some worry that adding a Hispanic man to Obama's ticket will make some white voters nervous. The idea that a Black/Brown ticket is too much for America is a little preposterous. Anyone who's racist enough to oppose a Hispanic vice president probably wouldn't vote for a Black president.

The most troubling assertion is that he's flirty. While that gives him actual charisma points, that also gives him potential scandal points. But as long as he's properly vetted for past indiscretions (maybe I'm giving him too much credit, but he doesn't seem like an Eagleton to me), I think he can keep his hands to himself for four to eight years.

Richardson has been fairly reticent on the possibility, saying it would be an "honor" to serve Obama as vice president.

The Obama campaign has been even quieter regarding the VP spot. Obama said he wants someone who would be a good president should he become incapacitated, and someone who won't be afraid to give him advice. Obama's top advisor David Plouffe said they aren't picking a candidate just because it will win them one state or another.

Gee, thanks a lot guys. That could be anybody!

Even Bill Richardson.

BE ELECTED

Technorati Tags:

It may be all academic - come November

Obama has "changed" his position on FISA, and now he is having to explain his position on Iraq troop re-deployment. I know he took a lot of Clinton advisors into his campaign, and it's starting to show. Triangulation is not what the American people want, or expect, from Senator Obama. If he chooses Senator Clinton as a V.P. running mate -- there goes the "my campaign is about change" thing -- right out the window. He will be sending the message to Democrats who got him to where he is, that "business as usual, continues inside the Democratic Party, and inside the beltway. And, the special interests win - once more." The people be damned.

It's Worse Than That, ERW

The People will truly be damned - b/c Obama will LOSE in November, or like Gore win by so little that the Right can steal the election right out from under him!

Yes, I genuinely believe Obama is a much better choice than McCain, and enough of a better choice than Hillary that I supported him during the primaries - but nobody in the Democratic Party (including Obama, sadly) seems to have gotten the memo that the DLC and the Blue Dog Dems are the problem, not the solution. The equivalent pandering to the mythical "center" is what killed McGovern in 1972, Gore in 2000 and Kerry in 2004 (Mondale in 1984 didn't have to pander - he WAS The Mythical Center). Only Clinton in 1992 could win by win by "running to the Center" - and I have my suspicions that he really has H. Ross Perot's 19% showing in the popular vote, thus sucking away a lot of disaffected George I voters, to thank for that.

I still hold out hope that Obama actually believes in his "new kind of politics" that are genuinely inclusive - but his tossing out the ever-changing figleafs of "judical review" and "GAO accountability" for folding on FISA seems too much like Politics As Usual, and Screw the People Because Big Telco is Whining and Squalling! These are the same greedheads who are fighting Net Neutrality tooth&nail and w/lots of lobbyist's money...so I begin to wonder why Obama's catering to them at all....

18 million votes is not 18 million voters, come November

18 million people having cast a vote for Senator Clinton during the primary no longer translates into 18 million Hillary-voters to be won over for Obama, blah blah and blah. The numbers have drastically changed. If the primary race were held today in California, Senator Clinton would not win California. I would prefer Senator Obama not choose a Clinton or a Richardson for his v.p., but really, it's out of our hands.

NEWSFLASH: The Clintons Betrayed THEMSELVES

Richardson didn't "betray" the Clintons - the Clintons betrayed their supporters and themselves by their own actions. Or it's possible that, from their respective behavior following Hillary's concession, Bill and "his boys" betrayed Hillary by pushing her nomination campaign in a disgustingly ad hominem, racist direction. I originally had my doubts about the sincerity of Hillary's concession to Obama - but the more I see of her doing her part to ensure a Democratic victory in November, the more I'm sure a good part of her worst stumbles were due to really bad advice from her husband and his "DLC Bad Boyz" coterie.

As for you two, Andyod and Doc? You both remind me of those Japanese soldiers they found years after WWII ended, still holed up in caves and determined not to surrender to America no matter what. Or maybe you remind me of Bill "Obama can kiss my ass" Clinton - who may yet edge Holy Joe the Quisling Lieberman aside to run as McCain's VP on the Grumpy Old Men ticket....

Richardson fits the bill.

Read "My Country Versus Me" if you believe Richardson fits the bill.After the way he treated Bill and Hillary I would not trust him with 40 piece of silver,never mind our country!

VP

You got that right...Richardson couldn't get Obama four votes...Here's my opinion...If Obama starts blowing McCain away in the polls, He can pick Bill Richardson or any on else like him...But, if the polls show the race is going to be close, Obama's going to be forced to pick Hillary...18 million votes is 18 million votes...There's not another canidate out there that can get him that amount of votes..