If I Were a Betting Man, I'd Wager that Cheney Was Behind the Anthrax Attacks

Administration orchestrating the anthrax attacks? Well this is certainly conceivable. I see where Leahy is as of today (9-18-08) calling for an independent lab data investigation and input from the public. May I suggest AMIA Laboratories in Round Rock, Texas. If not for their superb technical chemical analysis expertise at the nuclear and atomic level, we never would have known NASA scientists were mischaracterizing our planetary science research resulting in scientific misconduct on their part.

http://www.bccmeteorites.com/misconduct-planetary.html

SRD-BCCM

Why?

Because these long-suffering groups have endured the most atrocious lies, corruption and genocide of this government to keep them in their place, they don't see Cheney through rose-colored glasses. While we're supposed to go strictly with the facts, the body language and nasty demeanor of Cheney says he has little regard for his constituents, let alone humanity. That's enough for me to go on, yet the facts are in your face.

But why single Cheney out as the evil one and the enemy - which he is? There will always be criminals in every society of the world. The real enemy here is ourselves. If the American people themselves weren't such greedy, consuming, arrogant, biased hypocrites, we would not allow a corrupt system to run our country and tolerate criminals like Bush/Cheney/elites to oversee it. We wouldn't allow a madman to get on TV and respond to legitimate questions by answering "So?"

We know what Cheney is. Until we come to terms with what WE are, there will always be Cheney's to enslave us and make us look like fools.

I don't see that happening anytime soon. This is a corrupt nation. It will take years for us to see the light...and we don't have that kind of time.

If Only I had a dollar for every time that I have been called a nutcase for saying that this was an inside job I could be sitting poolside in a villa in the South of France sipping a cool one.

One only had to look at Bush's face in that classroom on 9-11 to know that this slimeball was scared senseless .....not because of the attack but because he thought he was about to be exposed for his part in Operation 9-11.

That's the reason that when he collected his wits he hopped aboard AF One and was heading out of the country. My guess was that pRes Dick ordered him sedated and returned to DC!

Chicken George is the reason I adopted the Abby Hoffman quote below as a signature line shortly thereafter.

Just wait till Jesus gets his hands on you, you little bastard.... Abbie Hoffman

This is what these people do. Of course they are involved and is why the only things our side can is accomplish is to talk angry and send nasty letters. This is the lull before the storm. LTFO!

Outta the Cornfield

All of us can scream and bitch and complain about the corruption of this administration, but only one person can actually make a difference and do anything about it.....but she for some odd reason took accountability and impeachment off the table.

So complain all you want to Buzz Flash and elsewhere....but it is Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi that has done absolutely nothing to correct this.

For example, you didn't even mention Vice President Cheney's infamous, well-known scorn and contempt for Senator Leahy, long _after_ then Ranking Judiciary member(now committee Chairman) Leahy's office had been the target of those anthrax letters. (I am of course refering to Cheney's vulgar "go f*** yourself" spoken to Senator Leahy, on the Senate floor, a "blinking red" illustration of Cheney's repressed hatred and contempt for a Democratic Senator if ever there was one.)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3699-2004Jun24.html

More importantly, THESE LINKS should be on EVERY patriotic American's "Favorite LINKS" list or computer desktop:

#1. Bush and Cheney weren't merely warned "Osama bin Laden DETERMINED TO ATTACK IN AMERICA" by that August 6, 2001 CIA "presidential daily briefing" ("PDB"), because CIA DIRECTOR GEORGE TENET HAD GONE TO THE WHITE HOUSE on JULY 10, 2001, SPECIFICALLY TO WARN the president, vice-president, and anyone who would listen that "AL QAIDA WAS IN ADVANCED STAGES OF PLOTTING ATTACKS IN AMERICA," they already had cells in America, including potentially PILOT TRAINING CELLS.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/02/AR2006100200187.html

The NY Times also had a story covering Tenet's _JULY 10, 2001_ urgent visit to the White House to dicuss the LOOMING TERRORIST THREAT to Americans, a meeting that should NOT have been necessary, because for 7 long months, Bush and Cheney had done NOTHING to punish Al Qaida for the OCTOBER 2000 suicide-bomb attack on the USS Cole in a Yemen harbor, despite all their Republican campaign bragging about Republicans being the "better party" for America's national security concerns!

#2. Bush and Cheney gave Tenet THE COLD SHOULDER on that URGENT CIA Director's journey TO THE WHITE HOUSE to raise an urgent warning about possible TERRORIST ATTACKS ON AMERICA... BUT there is PROOF that Tenent's warnings were not ENTIRELY _ignored_, for less than two weeks later, ATTORNEY GENERAL ASHCROFT _STOPPED FLYING ON PUBLIC AIRLINERS_, citing an "FBI THREAT ASSESSMENT."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/26/national/main303601.shtml http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/26/national/main303601.shtml

Now neither you nor I nor any other American could say "THREAT ASSESSMENT" without asking, "Just WHAT KIND of 'threat'?" and of course the FIRST word that would spring to mind, especially regarding NOT FLYING PUBLIC AIRLINERS due to some vague "threat" - would be a TERRORIST threat.

From these three links, ALONE, the probability is well over 50%, that the Cheney-Bush administration KNEW that terrorists were on the way to execute attacks IN AMERICA, but that American passengers and airline crews were LEFT EXPOSED TO THAT THREAT, like sitting ducks.... like so much bait.

"BAIT" for what? Why, that, too, is easy: In June of 1997 (four long years before 9-11) then Halliburton Chairman Dick Cheney signed the Kristol-Kagan "NewAmericanCentury.org" manifesto, CALLING FOR THE INVASION OF IRAQ at the EARLIEST POSSIBLE MOMENT" to secure America's 'national security' in context of Mideast 'vital national security interests' (i.e "regime change" and a permanent US military presence in Iraq.)

Because Bill Kristol no longer is paying for the web-hosting of the now disgraced PNAC, you have to go to an archive site to see Cheney's signature (along with Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush, and his future Chief of Staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby among others) on that document.
(Note: After the 2004 elections, VP CoS Libby would be CONVICTED by a sympathetic Washington jury of PERJURY and OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE re the "CIA outing scandal" - everyone at that trial understanding that Libby was the "fall guy" carrying out orders for his superiors; just another illustration of VO Cheney's contempt for laws and America's genuine national security.)
http://web.archive.org/web/20070810113753/www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm

That attacking, invading, and occupying Iraq by force of US military were Bush administration policy goals long before 9-11(and pinning blame for 9-11 on Iraq after the terror attacks) has been established by many other writers, including former Secretary of Treasury Paul O'Neill (who was quoted in his biographical book "The Price of Loyalty" as saying " Bush planned Iraq invasion before 9/11")
(note: under terrific Republican/media pressure, O'Neill has since recanted some of his comments, and blamed "miscomments" on book co-author Ron Suskind)
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/10/oneill.bush/

and as well then US "counter terrorism czar" Richard Clarke has confirmed that not only did President Bush and VP Cheney IGNORE _repeated_ urgent warnings that Al Qiada had gone UNPUNISHED after the 2000 attack on the USS Cole and was PLANNING NEW TERROR ATTACKS AGAINST AMERICANS, but that immediately after 9-11 and the anthrax attacks, the Cheney-Bush White House sought to pin the blame for those attacks on Iraq. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/12/politics/12clarke.html

And finally, one last link that exposes the dark, morbid, sinister nature of the nation's "second-in-command" (VP) chief executive: all through the 1990s, then Halliburton Chairman and CEO DICK CHENEY was ENGAGING IN TRADE with SADDAM HUSSEIN, the internationally loathed and reviled Iraqi dictator, BEHIND THE BACK of the multi-billion dollar US-enforced UN SANCTIONS ON IRAQ, Cheney using Halliburton European subsidiaries to sell some $70 million of oil drilling technology to Iraq after Gulf War-1 had established Saddam as an "enemy of or threat to America."

Cheney's undercover, behind-back of US sanctions dealings with Iraq were all the more despicable, because, #1. US aircraft were actively BOMBING Iraqi positions in the "no-fly-zone" at the time; and, #2. that PNAC manifesto that Cheney had signed in June, 1997, DECLARED IRAQ TO BE AN INTERNATIONAL THREAT to America's security, precisely because those dastardly Europeans were helping Saddam evade and undermine the costly US embargo! http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/sanction/iraq1/oilforfood/2001/0627chen.htm

A final note to Democrats, patriots, and independents: all through the late 1990s, the Clinton-Gore administration REFUSED TO PUT A STOP to Cheney's HALLIBURTON DEALINGS WITH IRAQ, BEHIND BACK of costly US military sanctions on that country! This was not only a huge SQUANDERING of American tax-dollars, but was a case of political NEGLIGENCE if not dereliction of duty!

Democratic voters, activists, and donors worked their tails off to support Democratic candidates, but Republicans spent the entire decade of the 1990s trying to portray Clinton and Gore as being "TREASONOUS!" for dealing with China on nuclear spying and other issues... while the Democratic leaders LOOKED THE OTHER WAY on a far more substantive issue that for the average American (dealing with Iraq behind back of US military embargo on Iraq) would indeed carry the label of "TREASON"!

This was a horrible SQUANDERING, by Pres. Clinton AND VP Gore, of BOTH US taxpayer dollars, AND Democratic donor dollars. Because the Clinton-Gore administration was TACITLY COMPLICIT with Cheney's HALLIBURTON DEALINGS WITH IRAQ, Gore could NOT MAKE AN ISSUE of Cheney's treacherous double-dealings with a dictator HE, Cheney, had declared a "threat" to America's national security!