Something About Me and Mary: The Alleged NRA Spy Who Betrayed American Rights and Victims of Gun Violence

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG

Mark Karlin

Editor and Publisher

August 6, 2008

I knew an NRA spy.

Yes, the Editor of BuzzFlash (as many of our long-time readers know) has been an advocate for reducing gun violence for 25 years. My life has been threatened by gun nuts egged on by the NRA and other radical shills for the gun industry; I was commended for my work to save lives in public by Bill Clinton when he was President; I chaired or was president of the Illinois state group working for gun control off and on for 15 years; and I founded a national organization to promote grassroots public education on the issue.

Well you get the picture. I'm not boasting; I just want to lay the groundwork for what's to come.

I began my involvement with reducing gun violence after I was out jogging on the lakefront in Chicago in the early '80s. It was on the far North Side of the city and as I was running, I saw a funeral cortege go by with more than a hundred police cars, nearing a cemetery that separates Chicago and Evanston, Illinois.

A Chicago Police Deputy Superintendent had been shot and killed while waiting to be seated for dinner with another couple. He was armed, but it didn't matter. A gun owner was insulting the two women in James Riordan's group and Riordan told him to knock it off. The gun owner didn't like being told off, so he went to his car, removed a handgun from the glove compartment, returned to the restaurant, and shot Riordan point blank in the back of the head.

That was it, a Deputy Superintendent with a holstered handgun, trained in shooting, lost his life to some gun nut because he reprimanded the guy for being vulgar and obnoxious.

So I thought, as I was running and saw the massive tribute of surrounding suburban police departments that sent officers in their local police cars, that this doesn't make any sense. If an esteemed armed Deputy Superintendent, a man trained in firearms use, can be so easily shot down, what is the point of promoting the selling and ownership of handguns in the American society, which leads the industrialized world in firearms deaths?

And that was how I came to be an advocate against the NRA and someone that the NRA's state rifle association referred to as "Dr. Evil" and a "Bolshevik," if I recall. There have been so many tragically laughable insults and not so laughable threats hurled my way over the years by the gun lobby that I can't remember all of them. (And, yes, not all gun owners are pathological, but a lot of them are, particularly the ones in suburban and urban areas who see guns as an extension of their psychological identity. The rural guys tend to actually use guns for hunting and are often more realistic about the role of guns in their lives, but even for many of them firearms have come to carry a symbolic importance in their distaste for people from "the big city" who they feel "look down" upon them.)

Fast forward to 2008 and the publication of a bombshell exposé in Mother Jones magazine by James Ridgeway and David Corn. They reveal that a retired woman now residing in Sarasota, but formerly of Shady Grove, Pennsylvania, was a spy for the NRA. I knew her as Mary McFate, but the article revealed that she also spied on environmental groups and allegedly at least once urged illegal behavior in that role under the name Mary Lou Sapone.

The story has now hit the mainstream media, including the likes of ABC News and the Chicago Tribune. You see, most Americans don't like illegal spying (although Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi continually give the Bush Administration free rein to get away with it) -- and they don't like to see the Constitution violated. The NRA has always hidden its ideological and psychological zealotry (not to mention fronting for the gun manufacturers) behind the claim to a "Second Amendment Right" -- which only recently was given some partial legitimacy when a partisan 5-4 Supreme Court overturned all the Supreme Court legal precedent since the writing of the Constitution that de facto considered gun ownership a collective right.

As a volunteer and sometime consultant for gun control, I knew Mary McFate.

In fact, just this spring I was taken aback to be honored as a pioneer in the movement by state gun control groups at a dinner, as I assumed "emeritus volunteer" status. Mary was my dinner "partner," as she sat next to me, and we conversed through the long evening. She was always quite the conversationalist, someone you felt comfortable with. There aren't many grandmotherly types who make you suspicious, and neither did Mary. She was amiable, fun to talk to, but never mentioned her family, who -- according to Mother Jones -- joined her in her spying for cash enterprise.

When I first received word that Mary was being unmasked as an NRA and corporate anti-environmentalist spy, I was positively "blown away." Frankly, the NRA cut a deal with Rove in 2000 that if Bush was elected, they would get everything that they wanted, and they have -- including their insistence that terrorist suspects should have a "Second Amendment" right to buy guns, just like everybody else. So what did they need a spy for among gun control groups whose biggest need was funds to do battle with the well-heeled gun lobby?

I guess when you have as much cash as the NRA, you might as well violate the rights of Americans because you have to find something to spend it on. So why not pay a Daughters of the American Revolution member, such as Mary McFate/Sapone, who attended a fundamentalist college (that dropped government funding because it wouldn't comply with different provisions requiring equal access to education and sports for all) -- Grove City College in Grove City, PA -- to spy on gun control groups largely headed by people who had lost a loved one to gun violence or have been surviving on the most bare of budgets?

According to the background on McFate's/Sapone's college:

Grove City College remains true to the vision of its founders. Rejecting relativism and secularism, it fosters intellectual, moral, spiritual, and social development consistent with a commitment to Christian truth, morals, and freedom. Rather than political, ideological, or philosophical agendas, objective truth continues as the goal of liberal learning. The core of the curriculum, particularly in the humanities, consists of books, thinkers, and ideas proven across the ages to be of value in the quest for knowledge. Intellectual inquiry remains open to the questions religion raises and affirms the answers Christianity offers. The ethical absolutes of the Ten Commandments and Christ's moral teachings guide the effort to develop intellect and character in the classroom, chapel, and cocurricular activities

Mary McFate/Sapone is in hiding now. Ever since David Corn of Mother Jones called her Sarasota residence and she accidentally revealed that she was indeed the two Marys, her location has been unknown -- and she and the NRA have not offered any response to the Mother Jones article (which is based largely on the actual records of a consulting firm that engages in spying for corporate and NRA-type clients.)

People have asked me if I feel betrayed, and I guess my answer is I feel that, once again, the NRA and the gun lobby has betrayed the approximately 30,000 people killed each year by guns. It is for these victims that I feel the most outrage right now. They have been my friends and colleagues in doing the correct thing for a civilized and humane society for many a year, and I admire their tenacity and resilience in the face of a lobby totally indifferent to our rising death toll.

I don't know what part of Christ the woman who is the two Marys is claiming as justification for the treachery that she committed. She has worked against people whose lives have been torn apart and whose hearts have been ripped in half by gun violence. People on the right so often abuse Christ on behalf of their perfidy, it is a cliché by now.

But I do know this. What goes round comes round.

Good will triumph over the spies who would distort our Constitutional rights and so awfully take advantage of the trust of those who have suffered so much because of our gun mania.

I only wish that, wherever McFate/Sapone is at this moment, her dreams will turn into nightmares, and that the 30,000 Americans felled by gunfire in the last year will each parade before her and haunt her for the rest of her life.

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG

Technorati Tags:

Gun Control

Mark,

While I agree with you on most issues, I must depart from the fold on this. While gun control would make you feel safer, have you thought what it implies to have an unarmed citizenary.

If a president decided to declare martial law and call off the elections, only a well armed population would have any hope of regaining our swiftly depleting freedoms. Me, I'll be out there in the street with the other armed patriots trying to save YOUR butt.

If you really want to end the NRA's current policies, all you really need to do is sell voting memberships to the NRA on your website. If enough progressives join we can elect you to be the next Charleston Heston and you can lead the country to enact progressive laws that even most red-necked gun owners can back.

Don't destroy the NRA, become the NRA. The logic is almost Rovian. Just remember, even progressives can believe that the Second Anmendant is really all that protects us from dictators, foreign or domestic.

Keep up the good work.

The Old Hippy

So what did she do that was illegal, or violated rights?

You wrote "You see, most Americans don't like illegal spying…". What, exactly, did she do that was illegal? You wrote "I guess when you have as much cash as the NRA, you might as well violate the rights of Americans because you have to find something to spend it on." What rights, exactly, were violated? Seems to me that you and your ilk are the ones trying to violate the rights of Americans. I'm extremely glad someone is watching. Lastly, how, exactly, do you connect Mary to the NRA? Do you know somehow that she was with the NRA, or are you saying she was, because that is a well-known organization that you wish to besmirch? I suspect that your demagoguery has no basis in fact. My guess is that she did nothing illegal, the NRA violated no one's rights, and she wasn't in the employ of the NRA. My guess is that if she did something illegal and violated your organization's legal rights, you would be doing more than yapping about it.

At Least Get Your Story Right

Riordan died because he forgot everything he was supposed to have learned at the police academy. Here is the true story about that evening (taken from the perp's petition for appeal of his conviction): On June 6, 1981, Washington fatally shot James Riordan, First Deputy Superintendent of the Chicago Police Department. The shooting occurred in a corridor of the Marina City restaurant in Chicago. Prior to Riordan's arrival at the restaurant that night, Washington had been harassing patrons in the bar area. When Riordan arrived, he and his companion, en route to the restaurant area, stopped in the lounge to talk to a married couple they knew. Washington approached the foursome, grabbed the wife, held a gun to her head and pulled the trigger three times. The gun merely clicked; it did not fire. Riordan and the husband grabbed Washington and walked him away from the wife. Once away from the area, Riordan released Washington who thereupon entered the cloak room. When he emerged, Riordan attempted to escort him to the exit. In the corridor of the restaurant on the way out Riordan demanded Washington's gun and attempted to grab it. Washington pushed Riordan back and pulled the trigger four times. Unlike the earlier incident, this time the gun, apparently loaded in the cloak room, fired four bullets; three hit Riordan, two in the chest and one in the neck. He died from these bullet wounds shortly after midnight. Yeah, the real story doesn't tug so hard at the heartstrings, but oh well. Oh, how many "Mary McFates" do you think you have sat/are sitting next to?

The Trouble with Mr. Karlin

Mr. Karlin, I would first like to thank you for stating your opinion, in a very nice blog. And I commend you for exercising your First Amendment Right to Free Speech. I would also like to commend you for working on something that you believe has merit. Now, that you have stated your opinion and exercised your 1st Amendment Right to Free Speech. I would like to exercise mine. Granted we don't have to agree on anything, but the important principle behind the First Amendment is to be able to air our differences and.."Agree to Disagree". Fair Enough? On Gun Control: its the wrong approach to reducing violence. Violence is broader than just Gun Violence. Violence may be initiated due to emotion: Anger, Depression: a heated argument resulting in a murder or assault, suicide, etc. Violence may be initiated for Economic Gain, Sexual or some other type of "Reward": Robberies, Rapes, etc. A firearm (particularly handguns) are just one of many tools used to conduct some type of violence. Granted..they make a very convinient tool, but they are not the only tool, nor are they the cause of violence. The motivations for violence: its justifications and causes reside in the person's head who is committing the violent act. A Gun Ban, like a Ban on Alcohol or a Ban on Drugs is just a prohibition. It doesn't remove the demand for the product (sometimes it heightens the demand because now the banned product as a certain allure about it. It now becomes the "forbidden fruit"). Bans on items are rarely successful, and mostly in very small countries with tiny borders, and very restrictive governmental policies regarding civil liberties. The policies have to be restrictive in order to make a BAN work..even if only partially so. So lets deal with some facts. The United States has an estimated excess 300 million firearms in private hands according to the BATFE. The location of the vast majority of those firearms is mostly unknown. In addition, the Continental United States has 2 very long coast lines (bordering the Pacific, the Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico). The US also has 2 large borders..a border with Canada, and another with Mexico. Firearms do NOT disappear by themselves. They don't have an expiration date. They can remain functional for hundreds of years. Given the huge numbers of firearms within the US, in unknown locations, and given the fact that the US has some very long borders, and given the fact that firearms remain functional for centuries.. One can readily see the futility of enacting Gun Control Legislation within the United States in the attempt to either restrict or to prevent the flow of firearms. Like illegal drugs, people who want firearms will always get them. If laws are particularly draconian then the price of the banned item will go up and organized crime will move in to supply market demands. Simply because it becomes very profitable to do so. As for Gun Control..as a rationalization to prevent Gun Violence. It doesn't effect criminal elements. Only people who seek firearms through legitimate and highly regulated channels. One might as well try to stop the ocean's tide from comming in with a bucket and a shovel. Like it or not..Guns are going to be available to criminal elements of society. So...wouldn't all of the that hard won money and effort be better spent on addressing causes of violence? Such as Education, Institutionalizing the Mentally Ill like we did prior the the 1970's,or providing a way to re-integrate a former convict back into society through the use of rewards and punishments? That is, one can help reduce the recurrence of crime by a released criminal by offering a gradual restoration of rights after a certain period of time (after which their record becomes expunged) Regards, Boston Terrier

NRA Spy Should Be Shot

Seems kinda harsh, don't it?? But what better way for her to go out...in a blaze of glory. Since she is so enamored of the NRA, I'm sure she wouldn't mind taking a bullet for them. Would she? It is exactly what Mary McFate has created with her years of spying for the NRA: THOUSANDS of gunshot victims. A personal tragedy, suffering as she has made others suffer, is the only thing that will give people like Mary McFate a wake-up call to their unconscionable actions. I wouldn't wish it on her family, her children, her loved ones, even though apparently they share her predilections. It's obvious she got in first, and brought them in later. No excusing them, but she PERSONALLY should suffer the consequences of the ridiculous and murderous gun "laws" the NRA promotes and paid her to gather information for. I found Buzzflash in 2000 through my association with the Million Mom March. I became involved with that organization after the shooting death of the son of a friend. He was 20 years old. Out getting videos with some friends. Shot by a felon using 'cop-killer' bullets. His mother, my friend Rita, became a vocal advocate for sensible gun laws in California. She, like so many others, paid the ultimate price so that right-wing gun nuts can have their toys and protect their so-called "right" to shoot anything anywhere any time. People like Mary McFate make me physically ill to contemplate. They used to shoot spies.

Grove City College curriculum

The ethical absolutes of the Ten Commandments and Christ's moral teachings guide the effort to develop intellect and character in the classroom, chapel, and cocurricular activities

Uh, what about the part where Jesus says, "Those who live by the sword shall perish by the sword"?

ARGH! PLEASE edit your work!

Mark: You raise (albeit in a tortuous manner) valid points in your editorial. However, because of what is quite possibly the worst editing I have seen in an on-line service that wants and needs to be taken seriously, the reader has to wade through gaffe after gaffe. There is a HUGE difference between the word "their" (a pronoun) and "there" (an adverb). Check out your eighth paragraph, 2nd sentence. Woof! In the 13th paragraph I can't begin to understand your point because you tell me that Bush caved to the NRA "assistance" that terrorists be allowed 2nd amendment rights. I have NO idea what that means. I think you meant "insistence," yes? Finally, what in the world was your point in bringing up Biblical references to Mary? The sentence structure is so awful that it's hard to understand what you are trying to accomplish. In order to survive financially BuzzFlash simply HAS to do serious writing, and that includes doing some SERIOUS editing! Rollyn Carlson "A small bunch of fleas biting strategically can make a big dog lie down." Sojourner Truth

I have to agree about the editing.

I was going to post a similar comment yesterday regarding poorly written articles and the need for better editing. I'm a newly registered member, and over the past couple days I've been surprised by the numerous spelling and grammatical errors I've encountered while reading articles. Additionally, articles often include unnecessary statements, or ones that make little sense. I understand how funding might create some restrictions, but perhaps a dedicated, professional staff editor is in order? Thanks for the work you do and the service you provide.

Proofing/Editing

We've tweaked and hope readers will find the commentary clearer now.