How About a New Yorker Cover with the Editor's Head Up His Ass?

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG

Mark Karlin

Editor and Publisher

July 15, 2008

I tried my mightiest not to write about the appalling and inexcusable New Yorker cover that provides a racist, right-wing stereotyping caricature of the Obamas. From our view, knowing a thing or two about public relations, the decision of The New Yorker editor to run the cover probably included the likelihood of massive free publicity: mission accomplished. So I didn't want to help them out.

c

But I got a call yesterday from a long-time reader (since 2000) who occasionally e-mails us tips and with whom we have grown close in that Internet sort of way. (I won't reveal his name because he is in the media business in Manhattan and his feeding of information to BuzzFlash could cause his professional life a setback, to say the least.) He was distressed by the cover, in fact in pain. He was concerned that, given that there was no context to the so-called parody (The New Yorker could have had Rush Limbaugh popping pills and hallucinating the image of the Obamas with a contented druggy smile on his face, but the Conde Nast empire and its owners, the Newhouse family, probably doesn't want to offend Rush and his backers), and that a display of bigoted images on newsstands around the country (without any indication except inside the heads of the cartoonist and New Yorker editor that they were meant as "parody") could help further incite racism and a fear of Obama.

More stunts like The New Yorker pulled off could lead to setting off an assassination attempt.

The New Yorker is one of the best publications in America in terms of political writers and content. It, unlike The New York Times news section, regularly blows big wide holes through the lies of the Bush Administration and the status quo in D.C. It has a stable of some of the finest, most conscientious political-government journalists in the United States, including the incomparable Seymour Hersh. Today, July 15th, a book that blows the lid off Bush Administration war crimes in relation to torture is being released. It is by New Yorker writer Jane Mayer.

So what happened?

We can only speculate that a combination of a desire to get free publicity (The New Yorker has nearly a million subscribers -- more in California than New York by the way -- and is actually growing), New York insular smugness, arrogance, insensitivity, and a horribly misguided concept came together to cause a Frankenstein cover, in a magazine that has been known for its droll artwork.

It's inexcusable, and instead of apologizing or promising that McCain and his wife will get the same treatment, the editor of The New Yorker has indicated, with dripping disdain for critics, that they may or may not do something similar with the McCains (which is not really going to undo the original wrong, just compound it equally.)

If the Obama cover were not so radically devastating in fanning the flames of racial and political stereotyping, it would be something to move on from. But the cover of the July 21st New Yorker (weekly magazines dateline themselves a week ahead so that they appear timely on the newsstands) will be seen at bookstores, magazine stands, airports, doctors' lounges, etc., for quite sometime. This is not short-term damage to civility, but a contributing factor to the inflaming of the crackpots in our nation and the nurturing of the lies behind the caricatures. In short, the images on the cover don't debunk or sneer; they promote the lies themselves.

As one blog that a reader posted on BuzzFlash.net suggested: "Well, The New Yorker has published some of the great cartoons of our age. Here's an idea for a new one: a cartoon about a cartoonist penning a cartoon, and editors approving it, all with their heads up their ..."

Sometimes the insularity of Manhattan can be as confining as small town prejudices. Living and working in the world's most self-important city doesn't give one the right to act irresponsibly.

It just may mean that your head is stuck up your ass -- and you can cause great harm due to your smugness and a desire for some free publicity by creating a gaper's block that can harm the basic civility of our nation.

THE BUZZFLASH EDITOR'S BLOG

Technorati Tags:

Obama says New Yorker insulted Muslim Americans

Obama says New Yorker insulted Muslim Americans By GLEN JOHNSON Associated Press Writer This illustration provided by The New Yorker magazine, the cover of the July 21, 2008 issue by artist Barry Blitt, shows Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama dressed as a Muslim and his wife as a terrorist. The magazine says the cover is meant to satirize the use of scare tactics and misinformation in the presidential election to derail Obama’s campaign, but Obama's campaign called it "tasteless and offensive." Democrat Barack Obama said Tuesday that the New Yorker magazine's satirical cover depicting him and his wife as flag-burning, fist-bumping radicals doesn't bother him but that it was an insult to Muslim Americans.

Like Jon Stewart says ...

Barack Obama's response should have been - "Barack Obama should in no way be upset about the cartoon that depicts him as a Muslim extremist, because you know who gets upset about cartoons? Muslim extremists ...

It's just a f@cking cartoon!"

Buzzflash Cartoon: Jesse Helms hung by testicles not offensive

To: McCain Dirty Yellow Submariner Y(es)man... Clearly only Muslim extremists would be offended by such a cartoon... It's just a f@cking cartoon!

I wouldn't be offended by it, Norm ....

... but it's interesting that you think it would be offensive.

McCain Dirty Yellow Submariner Y(es)man says:

"but it's interesting that you think it would be offensive" Really, please show us, Moron, where I made that statement. BTW, do you think Jesse Helms would be offended by a Buzzflash cartoon showing himself being hung by his testicles?

I could care less if he would be offended ...

But more importantly, I almost missed it! You're ridiculous attempt at an analogy focused on Jesse Helm's testicles!!!!

Hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahaha..........

Moronic McCain Y(es)man

So apparently you believe that Jesse Helms would be offended by a Buzzflash cartoon of him being hung by his testicles...very interesting.

??????????????

Maybe if you got laid once in a while ....

Dirty Yellow Bellied McCain Y(es)man

Are you a voyeur? I really don't care. In any case you have proved yourself to be a hypocrite by attempting to use Jon Stewart to prove slandering Mr. and Mrs. Barrack Obama is not indefensible.

Try that again in English, Norm ...

... if you're able.

Moronic Yellow Bellied McCain Y(es)man

Your mother has my condolences...

Thanks, Norm ....

Your mother has my underwear.

.............................................. Could you get her to return them?

Y(es)man

Please give me your name, address and phone number and I'll see what I can do.

Thanks, Norm .... Re: the contact info ...

Just ask your mom ...

............................. or your sister. ;)

Yellow Bellied McCain Y(es)man

Who should I ask for?

Just me, Norm ....

Geeeez .....

......... How many guys do you think they're bangin'?

Ohhhhhhh ................... I see.

Y(es)man, I know you don't share your sister with anyone

It's a Republican kind of thing.

???????????

?????????

Satire

In order for this satire to be effective one has to be aware of what the New Yorker is all about. The problem is that the exact same cartoon would fit right in on any extremist right wing website and could be used by any of the usual hate mongers (Coulter, Hannity, etc.) with no changes. A group of minute men, aka racist losers, were protesting Obama's speech here in San Diego just yesterday. Their signs were echoing the exact same sentiments as the cartoon. As satire goes, this was very poor execution by the New Yorker.

watching from overseas

Davy Jones, How I feel for what I assume are the vast majority of American's who are distressed by the theft of their country. BUT, so often these days you sound like a country of barking dogs. The land of smug and smugger. This is the best one of your TOP magazines can offer? How constructive, one more barking point and never a look at the issues.

New Yorker cover

Letter to the Editor address at the New Yorker: themail@newyorker.com You can also comment on the cover at the same address while indicating you don't want your comments in print. In any event, the cover, whatever its 'satirical' intent, energizes the close-minded and easily fooled right to go to the polls lest that "Muslim terrorist" get elected. Most of these folks were going to sit this one out since even the arch-conservative McCain was not extreme enough. But no more. They've seen the cover. That's all the proof they need. And speaking of free publicity...they got it. My little right-wing rag in neocon West Central Ohio, featured the cover in their front section. In my Letter to the Editor, I wrote that "It is imperative that you apologize for this incredible misstep. In your lust for national coverage, you have exposed this country to a new round of lunatic statesmanship that will be sure to follow the election of Mr. 894 out of 899. Again, that address: themail@newyorker.com

THE BOAT CAME & WENT

The New Yorker cover was clearly meant for a certain segment of its readership and NOT the public at large. Where I presently reside, its 'import' would have evaded and offended over 4 in 5 'viewers' merely because they were 1) intellectually limited & 2) what I'd call 'voting booth racists'. The #1's would NEVER 'understand' the 'hidden meaning' in the cover and would vote for MCCAIN because they are more comfortable voting for a white man more stupid than they are rather than a HIGHLY INTELLIGENT African American. Hey, they've supported and seen such a man make it to the Whitehouse every election since 1980. As for the #2's, they'd smile at the cover and then vote for HITLER out of racist fear & hatred they'd only admit to themselves in the voting booth. BY THE WAY, OBAMA WAS NEVER RAISED A MUSLIM. ONE KNOWS THAT BECAUSE HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE KORAN IS 'VACUOUS'!

LMAO!!!!!

The truth hurts!!! LMAO!!!!

Right on Buzzflash! New Yorker Should Fire Remnick

Right on Buzzflash! Remnick definitely has his head somewhere on this--and it is not looking in the mirrior at this racist cover. I read his response today to criticism today. He called it “Political satire?” Puh-lease... Question One: Where was the New Yorker cover “satirizing” people who think Bush is a fascist, showing him in a Nazi uniform torturing an Iraqi with a branding iron with an insignia of the American flag, while his wife high fived him dressed in an S&M outfit? Answer: Will never happen. Because cartoons satirize people and ideas, they don’t satirize critics of those people and ideas. Question: Is there any racist, sexist, xenophobic, neo-Nazi cartoon that would, by Remnick's logic, NOT be a satire of “those people” who might believe is such racist cartoons? The answer is apparent, and your intellectually dishonest rationalization is transparent. Remnick should have looked in the mirror and seen the racist double standard his management provided in responding to this uproar. The imbeciles on West 43rd Street are hunkering down now. But they are in for the uprising of their lives. I will now cancel my subscription of 15 years. And I call upon other readers to boycott the advertisers of the New Yorker until Conde Nast fires or demotes Reminick and apologizes for this outrage.

Terrific!

I was thinking of canceling my subscription, but pressuring advertisers to get Remnick fired is waaaay cooler. Thanks.

I like it

I live in New York and I like the cover. I believe Obama was raised as a Muslim.

Where's the evidence?

"Raised" as a Muslim? Because he went to school in Indonesia for
a year or two?
1. What is being "raised as a Muslim" exactly?
2. And if he had been, so what?

Colleen Clark
Cambridge, MA

Mr. Pell Likes It

He also likes the Easter Bunny, who is real, and Santa Claus, who really lives at the North Pole.

Ed Pell is a Pinko Commie

Ed, Go back to Cuba where you belong!

Huh?

Why would you think Ed Pell is a Commie from Cuba because he thinks Obama was raised a Muslim. Most likely he's a Republican from Berchtesgarden.

bettysdad

All McCain Dirty Yellow Submariners are Pinko Commies because they support John McCain, who is a Pinko Commie Adulterer traitor to the American People. p.s. It's Berchtesgarten: http://www.briggsweb.de/Garmisch/index.html

TNR's Ryan Lizza "The Agitator" lent out to The New Yorker

Ryan Lizza recycled (no, not in the environmentally friendly way), his hatchet job report on Barrack Obama that he wrote way back in March 2007 for the New Republic as a Senior Editor. Ryan Lizza is a proud member of McCain's Dirty Yellow Submariners: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/bobamasunlikelypoliticaledu.html

New Yorker

I find it funny that you would be offended by the New Yorker when you spent so much time swiftboating Hillary Clinton. She was degraded, demeaned, and insulted and did not whine about it. The supposedly progressive DNC, Obama and his supporters celebrated this kind of behavior when it was aimed at Hillary. Keith Olbermann even called for violence against her. Did Buzzflash speak out about it? If you did not speak out about what was done to Hillary or took pleasure in it you are hyprocrits for whining about the magazine cover! YOU are part of the problem and have no one to blame but yourselves. What goes around comes around or you reap what you sow. I am not a Hillary Clinton supporter but I am a decent human being and I was appalled about how she was treated.

Really?

Swiftboating Hillary? The swiftboaters were liars. What lies were promoted abut your girl? And how did the DNC, Obama and his supporters celebrate these lies? And provide a link for Olbermann calling for violence against Mrs. Bill Clinton. Don't use terms you don't know the meaning of. and don't post information you made up.

How about some of your lies, Mikey

Since when do you have a problem with lies and information you made up? Let's see. Just a few of your lies about Sen. Clinton:

1) She was fired from her job as an attorney on the Watergate committee. Only she wasn't, as pointed out by none other than the accuser himself (Jerry Zeifman) and Media Matters. http://mediamatters.org/items/200804040011?f=s_search

2) She graduated in the bottom third of her law school class. Of course, a few days later you said bottom sixth, so it's probably even lower now. In reality, she was an editor of the law review.

3) You claimed she lied when she said she "helped" the Northern Ireland peace process. Then you claimed John Hume said she was only a cheerleader in the process. In reality, it was another participant who said that as far as he knew, she was a "cheerleader." Of course, many of the other important players in the process acknowledged the importance of her contribution to the process. Heck, even the Obama campaign acknowledged her contribution.

Then there's a myriad of lies by others on Buzzflash and other progblogs (the Trina Bachtel non-lie, the racism accusations, blah, blah, blah). Of course, I guess being in advertising you're used to the bar being set pretty low, huh?

Progressive?

Hillary is a "girl" eh? Oh. I get it. You meant it as satire, yes?

No.

It's meant to annoy all the phone feminists and PC loons who value process over progress. You know, it's more important to use perfect words than to prevent McCain from being elected.

tennismom, I understand McCain is still looking...

Maybe you could volunteer your services to Johnny Boy. He likes them young and beautiful. Do you fit the bill?

You'll have to excuse Norm

His posts tend to fixate on his own sexual musings.

Been a loooooooooooooooong time for old Norm.

how About a New Yorker cover with the Editor's Head Up His Ass?

Norm, This is just the kind of insulting remark you criticize the New Yorker for making through their cover. Disrespectful, off the mark, intended to destroy any semblance of civilized conversation.

Wrong.

One of the biggest, if not THE biggest reason the left is held in such low repute is that we are far too respectful, and do not set out to destroy our opponents. We are seen as wimps, and the right simply rolls over us. People want to see others as willing to stand up and fight for their beliefs. If that means taking them down verbally, that's great. You can only have "civilized conversation" with a civilized opponent, and ours are not civilized. This desire by so many on the left to be morally superior to the right is causing us to lose year after year. The most important movement in the last 100 years, the labor movement, was not led by men who worried about the words they used about management.

Not

No it's not. Your ability to mimic Republicans is what loses you elections.

Wrong

Yeah, Democrats are too respectful to our opponents and are utterly wimpy in that regard. Why? Because we are so busy being disrespectful to OURSELVES. We form a circular firing squad every chance we get. And, THIS is a good example of it. Hillary and Obama people are STILL fighting???? To WHAT end? That's my point. We NEED to turn our intelligent ire on the Republicans and quit insulting one another. And, that means me, too, and I mean no disrespect or insult to you at all.

Bettysdad HATES the Clintons ....

Even more than wanting Obama to win, he wants Hillary Clinton to lose. He even said he wants them "ground into the dirt", and he will no longer support Obama if he chooses her as his VP.

He's not a Dem ....... he's a nutjob.

Y(es)man, Another McCain Dirty Yellow Submariner

Y(es)man, stop banging your sister! Didn't you know your children would be genetically defective? p.s. Johnny will let you bang Cindy since he's got plenty of new squeezes on his Lynch Mob Express Bus.

My sister? She told me she was YOUR sister!

Hey ........ you should be happy for her, Norm. At least someone from your family's gettin' some.

As for the genetic defects, I had to get over that once she told me she was your sister.

BTW - Thanks for proving my point about your tendency to fixate on your bizarre, sexual musings.

Dirty Yellow McCain Submariner Y(es)man

How lame can you be, "She told me she was your sister?" You are so stupid your mother kicked you out of the house when you were 2 years old. Thank God that Black family in Lakewood, NJ fed you and clothed you and made you the good little neo-Nazi that you are today. I expected more intelligence from a Dirty Yellow McCain Submariner. What a moron you are. Adolf would be ashamed of you.

Meds a little off, Norm?

Why would a "Black" family make someone a "good little neo-Nazi"? And "Pinko Commies" support John McCain? Do you know what "communist" means? Stop giving communists a bad name.

Hey, wait...... just noticed. No bizarre sexual references.

Wait a second .................... what did you mean by "Dirty Yellow (McCain) Submariner"?

Dirty Yellow McCain Submariner Y(es)man

Moron, what have you done for your country lately? Working as a Pinko Commie McCain Submariner doesn't qualify you as a patriot. Why don't you sign up for duty in Iraq and make us all proud of you? Even your Black adoptive parents will respect you for doing the right thing.

Having "Black" adoptive parents ...

... is supposed to be an insult, Norm? Maybe in your circles, Norm.

"Sign up for duty in Iraq and make us all proud of you"?

You mean ................. you're not proud of me already? (sniff, sniff)