Is George W. Bush Guilty of Murder? Vincent Bugliosi Thinks So. Do You?

A BUZZFLASH READER CONTRIBUTION
by Ilene Proctor

Q: How Can A Man Become a National Best Selling Author Without Ever Being Reviewed By The Mainstream Media?

A: The Internet and Progressive Radio Caused This Media Sensation

WATCH OUT WASHINGTON! HERE COMES Vincent Bugliosi’s The Prosecution of George Bush for Murder.

Make no mistake, things have been done to America in these recent years that are unwise, unjust, unconscionable, unacceptable and un-American by President George Bush who pursues his partisanship, his profiteering, his perjury, his pardons and his power that are frankly, according to best-selling author Vincent Bugliosi, unpardonable.

In The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder, Bugliosi presents a tight, meticulously researched legal case that puts George W. Bush on trial in an American courtroom for the murder of nearly 4,000 American soldiers fighting the war in Iraq. Bugliosi sets forth the legal architecture and incontrovertible evidence that President Bush took this nation to war in Iraq under false pretenses-a war that has not only caused the deaths of American soldiers but also over 100,000 innocent Iraqi men, women, and children; cost the United States over one trillion dollars thus far with no end in sight; and alienated many American allies in the Western world.

A BuzzFlash Review

Make no mistake, the hourglass is running out of sand for the darker impulses of this decider of our national politics and his destructive policies.

In The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder (Vanguard Press, 2008), Bugliosi, the man who successfully prosecuted Charles Manson for murder, argues convincingly that President George W. Bush's conduct in taking the US military to war against Iraq under false pretenses in March of 2003 qualifies him to be prosecuted for murder in any state in the nation. Written in an in-your-face gutsy style, Bugliosi manifestly maps out Bush's destiny.

Despite a virtual press blackout, Vincent Bugliosi's book has became a national best seller and is fast becoming a cult fave amongst outraged Constitution loving, Bill-of-Rights adherents, Declaration of Independence followers, Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Greens and Independent Americans alike.

One of the first references to Iraq made by the Bush administration after 9/11 was made on October 15, 2001, by then Secretary of State Colin Powell when he told the press: "Iraq is Iraq, a wasted society for 10 years. They're sad. They're contained ..." If that were the case, how were they supposed to be a threat to the world's strongest military power?

Bugliosi calls our attention to the fact that after Bush had started talking about the possibility of war with Iraq, he said that his decision will be based on the "latest intelligence." What he never said, of course, is that on October 1, 2002, the classified 2002 National Intelligence Estimate issued by the CIA and other US intelligence agencies said that Saddam was NOT an imminent threat to the US.

Not long after that, on the afternoon of October 7, 2002, then CIA director George Tenet delivered a letter to Senator Bob Graham (D-Florida), Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, saying "Baghdad for now appears to be drawing a line short of conducting terrorist attacks with conventional or CBW (chemical or biological weapons) against the United States." That evening Bush delivers a speech to the nation at the Museum Center in Cincinnati, Ohio in which he called Saddam Hussein a "great danger to our nation."

Then there is the infamous reference to Saddam's supposed quest for uranium in Africa in the President's 2003 State of the Union speech, which was based on documents which beltway insiders believed to be forgeries. In October of 2002 George Tenet told Deputy National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley that the president "should not be a fact witness on this issue," and the reporting on it was "weak."

However, for many, the conclusive evidence that Bush knew Saddam was no threat to this country, and therefore an attack on Iraq was unjustified, was the following. Back in March 2003, Bush said that if Saddam Hussein did not give up his weapons of mass destruction, Iraq would face war. But earlier, in a January 31 closed-door meeting, Bush told his British buddy Tony Blair that the attack would take place even if no WMDs were found. Indeed, George and Tony candidly conceded that the discovery of such weapons was unlikely.

This deliberate deception is revealed in a confidential five-page memo written by David Manning, Blair's top foreign-policy advisor, who was at the meeting.

Manning records that both Bush and Blair were uptight that the WMDs were not going to be found, so George W. offered another fabrication to give them an excuse to attack. He suggested that the U.S. would paint one of our own surveillance planes in the colors of the United Nations and fly it over Iraq, hoping that Saddam would be provoked into shooting it down. Then the U.S. and Brits could invade, claiming that they were retaliating for Saddam's attack on the UN.

Ultimately, Bush and Blair stuck with the WMD lie, apparently assuming that the war would be quick, a new Iraqi democracy would spring up, and no one would remember all that WMD stuff.

Meanwhile, more than 4,000 Americans have died, Iraq is a bloody mess, and George W. says his war of lies will continue indefinitely.

In addition to providing us with the legal rationale and possible jurisdiction for such a prosecution of the President, Bugliosi also provides examples of how monstrously callous Bush has been since the war began in March of 2003. He provides several pages of photographs of scenes of carnage from Iraq juxtaposed with pictures of a grinning, clowning President Bush, having the time of his life. He also provides several quotes from President Bush made during a variety of stages in the war showing that the President was more concerned about running, fishing or going to a ball game than about the thousands killed in the war that he started. As Bush said in a press conference on December 4, 2007, he's been feeling "pretty good about life."

In the Acknowledgments section of the book, Bugliosi provides a valuable insight into the world of book publishing when he claims that many people at the largest publishing houses in the country told him that although they agreed with the conclusions in the book, and thought that the book would make money, they wanted to have nothing to do with it out of fear. It was, they said, "too hot to handle." In fact two liberal law professors of his acquaintance were scared to even look at the book! Bugliosi claims that this is all due to the climate of fear created by the current right wing in America, which brands anyone who believes George Bush's actions to be criminal as a "pro-terrorist," "anti-American" sufferer of "Bush Derangement Syndrome." One is hard-pressed to disagree with him.

In a political environment where impeachment of President Bush is "off the table," those who wish to bring the man to justice may have to look to the courts, but the question is, of course, who would step up and prosecute him? There are not too many prosecutors today who posses Bugliosi's passion for justice. Even if no charges are ever actually filed against Bush, at least The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder stands as an historical record of one more American President's mendacity on the issues of war and peace.

Bush's ascent to power has meant tragedy, failure and death. His arrogance and his administration's imperial grandeur have alienated what Jefferson called the decent opinion of mankind. His tactics have been pursued with contempt for alternate views, corruption of our democratic system, and condescension toward those who know far more about military affairs than he does.

While deliberately deceiving his nation into war, Bush championed the politics of fear, desperately seeking to frighten the people to justify his attacks on freedoms guaranteed by statute and constitution.

Like no administration before it, team Bush has mastered the media with its use of psychological research, coupled with the modern means of communication, to muster mass support for his elite agenda. With Bush as the prime player, his administration staged photo ops whose choreographed drama and camera-ready visuals ("Mission Accomplished"!) were intended to play to the emotions and overrule objections; reducing complicated geopolitical issues to black-or-white dualisms: Good Team America vs. the Axis of Evil.

The Bush administration represents the apotheosis of government by spin control. The philosophical takeaway here is the historical shift from the Enlightenment, whose commitment to reasoned debate and empirical truth used to be the cornerstone of our little experiment in democracy, to the faith-based worldview of fundamentalism -- not just the Christian fundamentalism of the religious right, but fundamentalisms of every sort.

The Iraq War came about, in large part, because of a harmonic convergence of personal passions, political agendas and ideological crusades, all faith-based rather than fact-driven. Bush, Bugliosi reminds us, is a man who "convinces himself to believe what suits his needs at the moment" and who "to this day ... seems unbothered by the disconnect between his chief rationale for war and the driving motivation behind it. Empowered by God to democratize the Middle East and police the globe as part of the constabulary duties of the Last Action Superpower, Bush has clearly delighted in establishing a star-spangled imperium. America's an empire now, and when we act, we reinforce Bush's own reality.

Today, Bush is busy covering up his dirty laundry, all the while planning for the next war. But Bugliosi is hot on his case, and the clock is ticking, the day is coming, when a grateful nation will soon celebrate Bush's complete and total removal from the high councils of government, once and for all, and hopefully, one day, be called to judgment by an awakened America for the great tragedy he has wrought.

The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder

A BUZZFLASH READER CONTRIBUTION

Technorati Tags:

Bugliosi

Not only should Bush be prosecuted, entities such as Faux News should be prosecuted as accessories. A huge part of the difficulty in bringing Bush to justice is the complicity of traitors such as Pelosi who also should be impeached and prosecuted.

Absolutely

Thanks for reminding us. Of course that coward is going to pardon everyone, then eigther pardon himself hope it holds up, or resign and let Cheney pardon him. Much better for saving some US prestige, to have dozens of states prosecute him for murder, than to pass it on to a war crimes tribunal. What he's done is so obviously a murder for profit scheme. Around 2003, I learned that there were enough lies, bullying, etc that it did qualify as murder, but then most of America was asleep. Now an MSNBC poll says 89% are for impeachment. If the Supreme Court tries to block us, impeach Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy for rigging the 2000 elections, and Roberts and Alito beacause they were not chosen by a constitionally chosen President.

Great book

Bugliosi's book is a cathartic read, and really gives the reader the feeling that such a prosecution is a possibility. Bugliosi deserves kudos for this courageous indictment. He does, however, leave certain things unsaid that need saying. For instance; he leaves the Bush cabal's specific motives out of the discussion. He frequently writes that Bush lied us into war "for his own gain" or "his own benefit", but leaves the specifics in this regard unexplored. I would have liked to have seen a chapter discussing a sopeana of Cheney's mysterious "energy task force", and the possibility that the Iraq invasion was in part conducted to remove Iraq's oil from the market for nearly a decade, resulting in the vast increases in oil prices that we have seen. Perhaps the oil companies could be named as co-conspirators in Bush's murder conspiracy? Furthermore; I'd like to have seen a little more discussion of the media's role in the crimes of the administration. Bugliosi frequently refers to the "stupidity" of our news outlets, but never explores the many clear examples of out and out complicity, which could and should - through the author's overriding logic - lead to the lethal injection of Brit Hume, Sean Hannity, and Peggy Noonan right beside Bush, Cheney, and Rice. ....but all in all a wonderful book that needs exposure. Read it and write about it to your local newspaper editorial page.

Yes, He's Guilty...

...along with many others. And, we can talk about it and talk about it till we all turn blue. He's stacked the Supreme Court; he's got the Congress so afraid that they won't act. Our only hope now is that the tide is turning, and that when it turns, we will not only look forward, but back. We will not only say, "Thank God they're gone", but "What really happened here?" Because if we don't prosecute these criminals, then we're just as guilty as they are. When Barack Obama is President, change will happen. And when we open the Pandora's box to public scrutiny, I believe we'll find evidence of a conspiracy so horrendous that we will all hang our heads in shame that it could happen in the good ol' USA.

well reasoned

Bugliosi's book is well reasoned, well documented, and well worth the read. Won't be too much of a surprise to anyone who has been following the news the last eight years. Had a bit of a problem finding it in a chain bookstore and the info people couldn't find it in a search at first, but eventually found it tucked in politics. Buy it, read it, and *then* discuss it.

Prosecution of George W Bush

Would someone please tell me why no one has assassinated the perpetrators yet?! My God! Why hasn't at least one of those returning soldiers done to these people in charge what they saw and did to innocent poor people in Iraq?! PTSD for all returning vets and not a one of them has gone ballistic on these freaks in charge?!

Bugliosi

Not that Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, Powell, Wolfowitz, Perle, Rice, Libby, Feith, et al should not be caged at Gitmo, water-boarded, receive a "trial" by military tribunal, taken outside, tied to posts and summarily executed by firing squad for their crimes but the D.A. that rose to fame by solving the Tate murders also wrote a book claiming that L.H. Oswald was solely responsible for the death of JFK and Specter's magic bullet really was magical. Let's not nomninate the guy for sainthood just yet!

Bugliosi and the JFK Assassination

How much of Bugliosi's book on the JFK assassination have you read? Can you site specifics where he is wrong in his analysis? Bugliosi's conclusions about JFK make me even more willing to accept his arguments that Bush should be tried for murder, not less. Now if we could just get him to investigate 9-11, we might finally get real answers there as well.

The DA and JFK

Please Jonathan, space does not permit debating the assasination here. The Warren Commission offered 26 volumes, the Bugliosi tome over 1600 pages, which only proves one thing, quantity does not equal quality. Vince might be a good prosecutor but he should leave detective work to the professionals. An area of the investigation that Bugliosi ignores, and a good book for you to begin your quest into figuring out who really did kill JFK is "Kill Zone" by Craig Roberts. As for your thirst for knowledge regarding the truth behind 9/11, I refer you to.....http://www.911truth.org/

Bush deserves a fair trial

Then he should be sent to prison where he belongs.

bravo

This was a well written article by someone who has apparently read the book rather than regurgitating one of the synopses available. Thank you Ilene Proctor!

George Bush for Murder

Should not Bush hang at Nuremberg alongside Powell, Rumsfeld, Perle, Feith, Rice, Cheney, Libby, et. al., and the ghosts of his fellow Nazis? This would be condign, ironic punishment.

Main

The main reason why prosecution and/or impeachment will not happen? Democratic Party complicity. Indictment and prosecution would mean self-incrimination for Democrats. Don't hold your breath.

And the penalty?

Public hanging that all family members must attend.

Is Bush guilty of murder?

He certainly has done enough to call for impeachment and to be indicted for murder, treason and war crimes. I agree with the above letters that his gang should be indicted with him. He is monstrous.

It this a trick question?

Hmmmm?

Simon Wiesenthal

One needs to start at the bottom and work up just as the Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal did. Americans and Iraqis are just as valuable as human beings as were the Jews and others in Nazi Germany. Those who killed these Americans and Iraqis to further an agenda need held fully accountable. I'm not going to hold my breath for Pelosi and her good but impotent buddy Steny Hoyer.

GUILTY OF MASS MURDER AND CONSPIRICY

Bush and all P.N.A.C. conspiritors

For sure..

Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld should be in prison awaiting execution for war crimes, treason, torture, violations of international law, and violations of the U. S. Constitution.

I agree that these

I agree that these scoundrels need to be punished, but you've got to remember one thing: this is The United States of America. This kind of justice doesn't happen here to these kinds of people. Steal a loaf of bread from the 7-11, then you've got something coming!

7-11

If you're BLACK and you steal a loaf of bread from the 7-11,you just might get the death penalty,depending on whether or not it was a loaf of white bread.

Why do you leave off so many accomplices?

Wolfowitz is as guilty as any; as is Feith, Libby, and that war salesman, Richard (The Prince of Darkness) Perle. What have people been smoking and drinking that blocks their vision of these criminals and their crimes?

People are sedated by the complicit media

It's not what they're smoking or drinking but what they're listening to. The corporate media has tickled their ears with what they want to hear i.e., "he's a good Christian man" so that people listen to the propagandists for their daily fix while the country has slid into a fascist state. It's gone. It's not coming back. Where are we going and why are we in this handbasket?