Sarah Palin and Fond Memories of Demagogues Past

THE FIFTH COLUMNIST by P.M. Carpenter

And thereupon graced the stage a woman whose very name 99 out of 100 delegates would not have known just one week ago, yet she was greeted by thunderously supportive hoots, hollers and hosannas as if she was the Resurrection, the Light and the Way; perhaps Ronald Reagan, Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln, all in one.

There is -- no kidding -- a metaphysical and in this case eponymous term, palingenesis, meaning, literally, from the Greek, another beginning, one in which one's soul slips right into another's physical form. Last night I think we witnessed just that.

It must be feeling pretty crowded in there for Sarah Palin right now, given that Spiro Agnew -- and not, as so many on the convention floor thought, Reagan or Roosevelt or Lincoln -- seems to have found a way back. At long last.

John McCain thought he needed an Agnewesque pit bull with lipstick, as the Alaska governor self-deprecatingly joked -- I think -- of herself. And John McCain sure got one.

This lady knows how to play rough, which in politics means disgracefully foul. Happily, that's the best of all possible scenarios for us political junkies, who possess a congenital love for the taste of blood.

And did she ever spill some last night -- this loving Christian; this warm, forgiving acolyte of Christ; this metaphysically regenerated marvel of Nixon's attack cur, in a skirt.

Oh, Spiro, how we missed you but nevertheless had our memory banks of you tapped last night as Ms. Palin unctuously inveighed against what she called "the permanent political establishment" -- let's see, Mr. Agnew, that would be the one you helped create (see, especially, Rick Perlstein's Nixonland), would it not? -- in which she denied any membership.

Producing, pleasantly enough, one of those paradoxical bad news-good news things.

On the one hand, through her speechwriters Ms. Palin has "learned … these past few days that if you're not a member in good standing of the Washington elite, then some in the media consider a candidate unqualified for that reason alone."

But take this you blackguards, you scurrilous lowlifes of Eastern elitism and liberal bias: "Here's a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I'm not going to Washington to seek their good opinion -- I'm going to Washington to serve the people of this country."

With that, the right-wing tumescence on the manly floor of the Republican National Convention commenced. These clowns will buy anything, as long as it's packaged in the most commonly demagogic denominator possible.

Still, Ms. Palin's heavier dose of venom was reserved, of course, for the real enemy of the people: He who strives to make government politically accountable and socioeconomically responsive -- you know, by promising silly stuff, like a mature global presence and domestic health care.

But beware, for he is but a wolf among you: "In small towns, we" -- the small-town we, not the cynical and citified you -- "don't quite know what to make of a candidate who lavishes praise on working people when they are listening, and then talks about how bitterly they cling to their religion and guns when those people aren't listening," said Ms. Palin.

So the dagger flashes, and now the wolf knows how he shall be hunted by -- a reminder is necessary -- this loving Christian; this warm, forgiving acolyte of Christ.

But I'm not complaining. This stuff is great. For it is merely the stuff of the poisonously unenlightening democracy we have so effortlessly fashioned for ourselves.

On second thought, however, perhaps I have my human analogues wrong, as well as the wrong election in mind.

At first, some of us thought this presidential election might be a defining replay of the somewhat more serious, if not classier, 1960 version. Then, last night, Ms. Palin seemed to transformationally elbow her way onto stage in a 1968 manner. But on further sensory reflection, I smell more Goldwater of '64 vintage than Nixon or Agnew.

Because that Arizona senator, too, realized he couldn't defeat the promise of a Greater Society with rational discourse. So he went, reluctantly, I should add, for the cultural jugular instead, deploying or exploiting whatever sharp wedges he could find. He wasn't happy about his strategic choice, but he saw no options. It was either the slimmest hope of desperation politics, or sure defeat.

And that, it would seem, is the ghost that Ms. Palin's speechwriters channeled last night. Their words in her mouth radiated the unmistakable message that they know this thing can't be won on the dignified up-and-up. No way.

And that, furthermore, is actually the good news: They were detectably dispirited at the starting gate.

Please respond to P.M.'s commentary by leaving comments below and sharing them with the BuzzFlash community. For personal questions or comments you can contact him at fifthcolumnistmail@gmail.com

THE FIFTH COLUMNIST by P.M. Carpenter

Technorati Tags:

"Sarah Palin

davidL Fact known only by a rare few: "Sarah Palin" is not who you think. Because of the opportunity to continue as the real person running the country, this is a crafty makeover, and we are actually seeing Cheney in drag. Same policies, new dress and 'do. . This explains his no-show on the early speakers list. His makeup person, now posing as the husband, is that creature done over with a new CIA face, created while he was in "retirement", is his good bud Rummy!

Silent Palin

You know they're not going to let her speak to reporters or answer any questions. She will make scripted speeches and that's it. "In this world of sin and sorrow, there is always something to be thankful for; as for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican." H.L. Mencken

Vice Presidential Debate

I can hardly wait for October 2nd when Gov. Sarah Palin debates head to head with Sen. Joe Biden, moderated by my favorite, Gwen Ifill who, I am positive, will do a great job. My bet is that Biden will leave Palin in the dust even with a month's prepping. Pat Williams

Having Lower Expectations Always Wins For Repugs

A consistent theme for Repugs is to downplay their candidates' debating skills so that if their idiots even string two sentences together then they were "surprisingly" good. They did it with Bush v. Gore and Bush v. Kerry. They are doing it with McCain v. O'Bama by saying McCain only does well in town halls and with Palin v. Biden. Please don't claim Biden will wipe her out or she will win with the commentators and the public by just having stood on the same stage with him. It is time to praise her oratory skills and raise expectations so that she cannot meet the pre-debate expectations.

It's hard to misunderestimate Sarah Palin.

That she will campaign like a pit bull, I have no doubt. Nor do I doubt that her presence on the ticket will energize the evangelical base of the Republican Party. But Sarah Palin will also be a bottomless well of scandal and controversy. Her lack of qualification for the VP job will become painfully evident if reporters bother to ask tough questions about subjects other than her personal life. And, as is already happening, she will be seen for the extremist that she truly is. Her religious faith in God's bloody, war-loving plan for the nation will frighten anyone with an ounce of sense and intelligence. But most of all, her mere presence on the ticket will call into question John McCain's judgement and decision-making ability. That should be the main thrust of the Democrats' plan of attack.

I'm seeing Eagleton...times 10

What Palin actually is is the least vetted VP candidate in modern American political history. The list of scandals that could force her to withdraw from the ticket truly dwarfs Thomas Eagleton's history of mental illness "scandal" in 1972. But in this case, Palin cannot and will not withdraw. McCain will take his Eagleton with lipstick and channel Pat Buchannen's 1992 culture wars and run for whatever daylight he can muster. And you're right, he has taken his Eagleton and morphed her into Agnew as they attempt a jury nullification strategy against the press by claiming any fact-based scandal they report about her is agenda-driven and should be disguarded. And when they're not doing that, they'll parade a bevy of GOP harlots in front of the camera schewing all the "sexism" pilled on poor unvetted Sarah as if every attack on her fitness for office is decried as an attack on all women's honor. And they'll try to get every small town in America in an uproar over the so-called Eastern urban liberal elites. And they'll act as if they are the only ones who can reform the corruption their own party created. We'll see how it all plays out. But I must say, I was impressed with Palin's political and communicative skills last night. And my gut tells me she played well with a helluva lot of people, so this is serious business. Now we'll see how she does when she pops out of her cocoon and tries to answer serious questions from serious journalists (if that ever happens). I suspect things may not go as swimmingly as they did for her last night.

All they need to do is stay close and they will win...

I got a wake up call for you...it go's something like this from, Joe Stalin....It doesen't matter who gets the most votes...It only matters who counts them....'nough said....

Little respect for the religious conservatives

Sarah Palin is a good example why I have little to no respect for the Christian conservatives and their movement. They lie, cheat and steal (My opinion!) Monday to Saturday and believe they are honest, good, worthy people because their religion forgives them on Sunday. This whole concept is BS. Good people live a good life seven days a week. She may say it's just politics and I should forgive the process. I say, let's discuss the issues on their merit. If the American electorate doesn't see through this smoke screen and she wins the right to occupy the house at the National Observatory it will be time to leave this wonderful country. It will never be the same under McCain/Palin.

Home run or lucky inning for weak pitcher?

After the speech that was half "a noun, a verb, and POW" and half disinformation, it seems the better baseball analogy, rather than hitting a home run, is that the inexperienced pitcher of questionable ability made it through the inning against the weakest part of the lineup (reading a speech written by others to a friendly crowd) and so the manager feels compelled to stick with the pitcher to face the heavy hitters coming to the plate in the next inning. If she had performed poorly, it is highly likely she would have been soon dumped from the ticket, but given her performance McCain is now forced to stick with her, almost no matter how many new revelations arise or how the existing stories develop. I would say "Good luck with that!"

Reposted: Hijacking in progress...

Have you been watching the Republicans' convention? the empty bleachers, the bored attendees, the choreographed hat wavers? The guy with the microphone, hooting "yeah, yeah!" over and over, pretending to be more than one sad and lonely shill in a disengaged, sparsely populated amphitheater? You know what we are witnessing, don't you? It is the hijacking of the tattered remnants of the Grand Old Party. The religious wrong has finally done it: they have made the brand "Republican" finally show its face. The Religious Wrongs don't care a whit about the drowning economy. They don't care about the next generation's health or wealth. They don't even care about sex before marriage, contrary to popular belief. They have chosen the Anti-choice and anti-gay stance above all other concerns, and are backing a candidate they assume will hasten Armageddon by any means necessary. With the pick of Sarah Palin, John McInsane has split his party in twain. May the GOP rest in peace. And may the Religious Wrong attain Nirvana all by themselves, among consenting adults, and leave the poor kids out of it!!!

Very interesting

I find it interesting that the three Presidential examples you used were Lincoln, Roosevelt, and Reagan. Was the inclusion of Reagan in that list intentional or a slip?

Conservatism Works

As a conservative I may be able to share the reason why Sarah is so popular now. She is a conservative. That's the summary, here are the details.

The conservatives in the Republican party have not been happy with many of their elected officials because they have moved toward liberalism. If you look back over the past 8 years, and even when Bush 41 was in office, the president and the congress lost approval ratings every single time the Republicans comprised their trusted and proven convictions to appease the liberals.

For the presidential race, Americans do not elect Democrats...they either hire or fire Republicans. This is because the country is center-right. Clinton got in (with less than 50% of the popular vote) because America wanted to fire Bush 41 because he compromised with the Democrats and raised taxes (which broke a campaign promise). Recall that he had 89% approval rating right after the first Iraq war.

Bush 43 has lost so much in the approval ratings because he compromised with the Democrats. If he would have remained conservative consistently then I believe he would have fared better.

Note: the current do-nothing Congress, controlled by Democrats, have the lowest approval rating ever in history. At one point it was in the single digits. Go Sarah.