Obama's Fortuitous Enemies

THE FIFTH COLUMNIST by P.M. Carpenter

"By almost every measure," Dan Balz of the Washington Post wrote, "Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama's overseas tour that concluded here [in London] Saturday was a clear success.... What isn't measurable is whether it worked. Will a week ... overcome the doubts he faces at home about his readiness to be president? And if it doesn't, what will?"

But just as Mr. Balz was asking, Gallup was answering -- at least in the limited way that any polling organization is able to answer. Sunday it released a fresh tracking poll that showed a nine-point advantage for Obama, just one painful point away from that magical double-digit status which provides so much aid and comfort to the soothsaying commentariat.

"The margin, coincident with the extensive U.S. news coverage of Obama's foreign tour," said Gallup, "is the largest for Obama over McCain measured since Gallup began tracking the general election horserace in March."

But then, Balzian- and koan-like, there came from Gallup the sound of that other, more ghostly shoe dropping: "A key question remains as to whether this 'bounce' is short-term (as happens to bounces in some instances following intense publicity surrounding a convention) or if his lead will persist."

Yes, that is commonly the question when a lead in any endeavor exists. Will it prosper and multiply? Will it flatline? Will it drop like the consumer confidence index? These, gentle reader, just in case you haven't made a scientific study of it, as polling organizations have, are the three general directions in which any statistical lead can head. Now you know.

Of greater entertainment value, however, is in the observance of the given pol out in the electoral wild -- Homo Politicus, as Balz's colleague, Dana Milbank, calls the creature -- as he plays with the numbers like a cat pawing a toy. And for my money, no pol is better at the expectations game than Barack Obama.  

"I'm not sure there's any short-term [political gain]," he told the traveling press corps en route from Paris to London, "and I know that seems strange since obviously we put a lot of work into it. I don't think that we'll see a bump in the polls. I think we might even lose some points" -- which Obama, in the role of Cheshire cat, believed about as firmly as John McCain believes he'll carry Massachusetts. 

At any rate, Obama then connected his gloomy, personal forecast with the declining personal fortunes of those marooned in George Bush's savage economy: "People back home are worried about gas prices; they're worried about jobs."

True enough. And among those folks knowledgeable enough to be genuinely worried about gas prices, jobs and the economy in general there must surely thrive an increasing worry that Obama's opponent is, it seems, a bit cracked.

After all, more corporate tax cuts and a little ExxonMobil offshore drilling to cure all that ails us?

Furthermore, what precisely is it that ails us? What, in McCain's stated opinion, is the greatest threat to the U.S. economy? "I would think that the absolute gravest threat is the struggle that we're in against radical Islamic extremism, which can affect, if they prevail, our very existence."

That's what the man said. About the economy. One-track Johnnie, who has embarked on a general election campaign possessed of the vastly improbable notion that voters will associate a costly Hundred Years War against scraggly terrorists with their best odds of finding a job.

All of which leads to this greater observation: From the start, Obama has been blessed with the most peculiar opponents. He could not have done what he's done, accomplished what he's accomplished, made it as far as he has made it, without them. From Hillary Clinton's martial fixations to John Edwards' rather mutable fixations to McCain's ... whatever, they have always been there, ready with their own message implosions that propel Obama even farther.

For a black man, he truly has the luck of the Irish. Obama himself could not have scripted a more promising GOP campaign -- for Democrats. Just as Tarmac Hillary almost literally shot herself in the foot, McCain persists in doing so almost each and every day, with gaffe after gaffe and inscrutable policy solution after inscrutable policy solution. His is among the most dependable of self-demolitions I've ever observed in politics.

So as for Obama's bouncing poll numbers? Not to worry. In the long run, McCain has him covered.  

 

Please respond to P.M.'s commentary by leaving comments below and sharing them with the BuzzFlash community. For personal questions or comments you can contact him at fifthcolumnistmail@gmail.com

THE FIFTH COLUMNIST by P.M. Carpenter

Technorati Tags:

Never Underestimate the Power of Racial Politics

Sorry, P.M. Carpenter, but as an African American who has seen the promising candidacies of Tom Bradley (D) for governor of California in 1982, Harvey Gantt (D) for U.S. Senate in North Carolina in 1990 and Harold Ford Jr. (D) for U.S. Senate in Tennessee in 2006 all go down to defeat because of last-minute appeals to white voters' racial fears, I am not convinced that Barack Obama's history-making run for the presidency won't also come under last-minute, racially-motivated attack. While I'm very proud that my home state of Vermont -- a state that is 97 percent white -- gave Obama his greatest margin of victory (59 percent) of any state in the Democratic primaries and caucuses, I'm nonetheless willing to bet that a racially-motivated attack against him late in the fall campaign is as certain as a snowstorm in January. It's hardly a secret that Obama has had problems drawing support form older white voters over 60 years of age (Even in Vermont, most voters of that age group voted for Hillary Clinton in the primary). And -- like it or not -- there is a stubborn 20 percent of white voters who won't vote for Obama under ANY circumstances, solely because he's black. Anyone who tells you that Obama will win easily in November is not telling you the truth. It's going to be an all-night cliffhanger on election night -- a repeat of the Kennedy-Nixon squeaker of 1960. I learned a long time ago that it's foolish to dismiss the power of racial politics.

Johnny McSame

This may well turn into a situation similar to what George Ready told Lyndon Johnson in 1964 when he said," You may as well stay home, Lyndon, your opponent is doing your campaigning for you."

Umm ...

Barack Obama is Irish, you silly person. As am I, from the Doherty clan.

I say Obama should make ‘I buried me wife and danced on top of her’ his official campaign jig.

"Black"

When I describe myself as "black", I'm speaking primarily about my connection to 400+ years of history of people of partial African ancestry in America. Is Obama connected in any way...?????

.

Does it matter?

Obama

The problem with so many liberals is that they think it horror of all horrors to mention that Obama is Black. He is, it is a fact and it is not racist to say so. Recognize it instead of trying to make all of us gray and a "oh, I never noticed he was black." Come on, get realistic and stop wallowing in the idea that we can't be different.

I DON'T HEAR ANYONE SAYING, "FOR A WHITE MAN".......

When they speak of McIDIOT! Of course it is racist!!!

I DON'T HEAR ANYONE SAYING, "FOR A MAN" ........

So everytime someone mentions Obama's race, they're being racist? There's no way it could have anything to do with the historic nature of his candidacy. Naaaahhhhhhh.....

Guess everytime someone mentions Hillary Clinton's gender, they're a misogynist.

BTW - Every time someone makes such ridiculous accusations, they dilute and diminish the claims of those involving real racism.

Who cares whether Obama is black, white, brown, yellow or green.

I'm happy I'm open minded enough not to worry about a candidate's ethnic background. I like Obama's vision of where this country needs to go. I also understand that I will disagree with him at times over specific issues. I'm looking for a president who will tell the truth. I'm also happy his VP choice will be someone who can tell him what he needs to hear, not what he wants to hear.

It's Hard Not to Look Presidential...

...when you're looking so, well, Presidential! I refer, of course, to Barack Obama. First, McCain lambasts Obama for not going to Iraq and Afghanistan, they he cries "foul" when Obama is well received throughout the Middle East and Europe. Then he shows the world that he, too, can eat sausage and drink beer. Then he rides in a golf cart with Daddy Bush. Will the photo-ops never end? And how about those McCain policy statements? Less drilling...no, more! The housing crisis & bank failures...it's all in your head! Birth control...yes, no, I dunno! Women are all c***s, anyway.

Uh, oh

"For a black man, he truly has the luck of the Irish." Please do not fall prey to what the corporate media outlets are doing: insistance on calling Obama a black with subtle intentions of influencing all bigots in the country, of which there are plenty. Obama is the offspring of both black and white. The correct definition of Obama's mixed heritage is bi-racial. So the above sentence would be better stated, "For a bi-racial man, he truly..." We all need to short circuit the corporate media by correctly referring to Obama as bi-racial when clarification is necessary. Better still, it would be nice to just call him a man.

Luck o' the Irish

How 'bout: O'Bama truly has the luck of the Irish.