McCain's Troubles, and My Sincere Thanks to Hillary

THE FIFTH COLUMNIST by P.M. Carpenter

"Do we have to win any of those to get to 270? No. Do we have reason to think we can be competitive there? Yes." 

The specified number, of course, is the needed electoral-vote count -- which George Bush exceeded by only 16 in 2004 -- and the "there" referred to is the expansive territory of traditional Republican states. That, in a nutshell, is Barack Obama's general election strategy, as outlined for The New York Times by his campaign manager, David Plouffe.

In effect, John McCain is under siege, or at least he soon will be. If anything keeps him up at night, it is surely the stark realization that his loose and rather shaky coalition of distrustful conservatives and unreliable independents is a mile wide but only an inch deep.

As a result, McCain is finding himself in a defensive position almost everywhere -- from North Carolina, straight through the nation's heartland in states such as Missouri and, almost incredibly, on out West to Montana.

As I wrote a couple weeks ago, some GOP strategists remain, to use politicians' favorite patois, cautiously optimistic about McCain chances. While acknowledging the ocean of scenario-changing time between now and November, one observed that "We’re actually sitting pretty well in most states.... McCain looks a lot stronger than our prospects as a party." (Not the most encouraging comparison for the Arizona senator, all things considered.)

Said another GOPer: "The broader environment clearly favors the Democrat. [But] a state-by-state analysis actually makes McCain a narrow favorite to win the Electoral College majority."

Those scenarios, however, are pre-siege -- an Obama offensive not only against McCain's strategic weak points, but a slash-and-burn campaign against the Republican nominee in virtually all 50 states.

It's going to exhaust McCain, physically, mentally and, above all, in financial resources.

While he's attempting to put out Obama-started fires in the swing states of, say, Pennsylvania and Ohio, the Democratic nominee will already be dumping personal facetime and millions of advertising dollars into the now-thin Republican states of Georgia and North Carolina.

By the time McCain travels to the most recently opened of Obama fronts, the latter will be long gone, campaigning in Missouri or Montana or Virginia and, most ominously for McCain, soaking them all with boatloads of media cash.

The anticipated outcome is the wearing down and out of the financially strapped McCain campaign. As the NY Times paraphrased Obama's strategists: "Some states where they intend to campaign -- like Georgia, Missouri, Montana and North Carolina -- might ultimately be too red to turn blue. But the result of making an effort there could force Mr. McCain to spend money or send him to campaign in what should be safe ground, rather than using those resources in states like Ohio."

Add to that mix an Obama veep pick of Ohio's Governor Ted Stickland or Pennsylvania's Ed Rendell, either of whom can singlehandedly keep the McCain forces pinned down in his respective swing state, and the GOP's candidate will soon be wondering why he didn't just settle for that fat Senate pension and Cindy's modest millions.

It's still far too early, of course, to accurately read a November electoral map. But Obama's financial ability to launch a 50-state strategy against McCain's current financial ability to launch what amounts by comparison to a 50-precinct strategy provides a persuasive peek.

Hence a little retrospection.

The two principal and positive results -- amidst the torrent of negatives -- from Obama's protracted primary war with Sen. Hillary Clinton were that he accumulated piles of ever-increasing cash from ever-increasingly enthusiastic donors and, second, he was forced to mobilize a nearly 50-state get-out-the-vote operation in the pursuit of victories in previously neglected, smaller and largely Republican states.

He accomplished both brilliantly. Yet perhaps both accomplishments would have been less than splendid without Hillary's determined if not quixotic and, at times, party-destructive opposition -- and for that we can extend to Mrs. Clinton, however begrudgingly, our gratitude.

That is scarcely a unique insight; nevertheless it is one that progressives of all partisan stripes should reconcile to.

Now, let the new asymmetrical games begin. Lacking cash, McCain's camp will need to compensate with creative ingenuity -- and knowing the GOP, it will be full of real duzzies.

Please respond to P.M.'s commentary by leaving comments below and sharing them with the BuzzFlash community. For personal questions or comments you can contact him at fifthcolumnistmail@gmail.com

THE FIFTH COLUMNIST by P.M. Carpenter

Technorati Tags:

mr 5th

save your phony gratitude and go back to what you've been doing, spreading propaganda: bill from ct

spreading propaganda

It is an old strategy for a propagandist to call those who are seeking the truth propagandists. I'm not pro-pagan, and neither is Mr. 5th. Pagans believe whatever appears on the surface without verification or proof. We antipagandists do the hard work of digging beneath the surface for the underlying truth. The only justification for Hillary's campaign tactics is the vetting of Obama. He has been proven as a purebred by Hillary's veterinarianism. In the most recent Doonesbury site's Straw Poll, a large majority of voters say that Hillary has earned the role of Team Player who does everything to get Obama elected, including turning her more vicious supporters away from McCain. I predict that she will not be chosen by the Democratic Party as their candidate for Vice President precisely because of the other interpretations of her campaign tactics which are not as generous as mine.

This land of ours

If the United States of Amerikkka ever wants to be the United States of America, Obama better be elected in a landslide. You would have to be a member of the Klan or have the IQ of a dish sponge to vote for McStain.

Obama will win the True Vote, but will he win the Recorded Vote?

truthisall.net http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/2008ElectionModel.htm

If the election were held today, the 2008 Election Model indicates that Obama would win by 310-228 electoral votes.

The State model projection indicates that he would capture 52.3% of the 2-party vote.

The National model average is 52.6%; but the latest 3-poll moving average (53.2%) shows he is gaining steam.

These graphs display the trends:

Aggregate poll shares

Electoral vote and win probability

Electoral vote and 2-party vote share

Latest battleground state polls

Battleground state win probability

Projection sensitivity analysis for 5 undecided voter allocation scenarios

The expected 2008 electoral vote was calculated in a Monte Carlo simulation of 5000 election trials. Since Obama won 99.5% of the trials, that is his win probability.

The model ran five scenarios of undecided voter allocation. In the most likely base case, 60% were allocated to Obama. In the worst case (50%) scenario, he had 51.2%, 289 EV and a 88% win probability,

Obama leads the latest state poll aggregate by 45.7- 43.0%. He is ahead in CO, IA, MO, NM, OH, VA.

He leads the latest national poll aggregate by 47.4 - 43.9%.

But there’s a catch: the projection assumes a fraud-free election. It assumes that the recorded vote will be equal to the True Vote – but it never is.

Approximately 3-4 million Obama votes will be uncounted (70-80%) and there will likely be vote-switching on the DREs and central tabulators.

The Democrats need a very heavy voter turnout to overcome the fraud. Obama will probably need at least 54% of the True Vote (2-party) to win.

Now for the good news: Obama should get the 54% - at a minimum. It’s only June and he is still leading despite all the media-driven negatives from the primary. Bush is at 25% in the polls – and McCain supports his policies. Obama's poll numbers vs. McCain can only go up as the focus turns to the election.

In 2004, the Election Model projected Kerry the winner with 51.8% of the 2-party vote and 337 electoral votes.

Unlike the Election Model’s poll-based projections, the Election Calculator Model was designed to determine the True Vote based on the estimated vote shares of returning voters.

http://www.geocities.com/electionmodel/2008ElectionCalculator.htm

The number of returning voters is estimated after adjusting for voter mortality and assumed turnout. Uncounted votes are estimated based on census statistics as a percentage of total votes cast.

Each candidate’s share of returning and new voters is entered into the model (the preliminary National Exit Poll “How Voted” category is a reasonable best case estimate).

The 2004 Election Calculator determined that Kerry won the True Vote in a 67-57m landslide (53.2-45.4%).

Slightly adjusting the 2004 NEP vote shares for 2008, the Election Calculator indicates that Obama should win the True Vote in a 71-59m landslide (54-45%).

Change happens from the ground up

Barack Obama often repeats this because it will take localized organization and participation at the grassroots level to engage voters and counteract the media propaganda. (I would never have known about my primary caucus if a kid hadn't come up to my front door with a pamphlet with all the caucus information on it.) Also we need to continue donating money, since Obama isn't taking lobbyist money. If we all take part in some way, it will take the load off all of us, and together in huge numbers we can rock this old USA!

Hillary and the 50 state strategy

Although I have been highly critical of Clinton's blatant efforts weaken Obama in the general election, I must concede that the extended primary battle served to broaden and heighten public awareness of the Democratic Party and its ultimate candidate. It also brought millions of heretofore political couch potatoes into the process and got them to register or self-identify as Democrats. This is especially true of younger voters, who are likely to remain Democrats for the rest of their lives (or until such time as the Dems screw up as badly as the current generation of Republicans). Obama's 50 state strategy is likely to yield dividends to down-ticket candidates in red states, who can expect a larger than average turnout of energized Democratic leaning voters. We have already seen Democrats triumphing in special elections in what were considered to be deeply red districts. The presence of the charismatic Obama in more of these districts will change voting patterns and the electoral map in ways that would have been considered impossible only a short while ago. It is good time to be a Democratic candidate and a bad time to be a Republican one.

Hats off to Hillary--- if Gore or Kerry had that spirit...

they'd have been president by now. I am NOT a Hillary fan... prefer Edwards... prefer Obama... BUT HATS OFF TO HER.... and if she has the strength and class to do it without the #2 spot... Let's see her get OBAMA into the WhiteHouse

Yes...

...there was a silver lining after all!! Hillary's campaign reminds me of the football adage: "If the practices are hard, the games are easy"! We will see if that theory holds true for Presidential politics! But man is it nice to actually begin the real fight. I expect that Hillary can be used to further Obama's victory in November. Bill, well who knows? He seems to connect well with voters in white Appalachia - as long as he doesn't put his foot too far down Barack's throat! Your suggestions of Rendell or Strickland for VP seem obvious from a tactical standpoint of winning key electoral votes. But I hope whoever gets the nod will bring in more than just either of those two states.

The creative duzzies are already in evidence

All other things equal McCain would not have a ghost of a chance, and the Gang Of Pirates would be spending their money on Criminal Lawyers rather than 527 attacks. Unfortunately things are not equal and McCain will still have near Mugabe level advantages

Most obvious is a Puppy Press that is increasing in open partisanship, sometimes stating openly than anything but GOP Psychophancy is just obvious left wing propaganda. Expect this in kind help to reach levels even Soviets would have been embarrassed by.

The next problem is the attorney firing scandal, or rather the ones not fired. They have had setbacks, but most of their bots are still in place already vetted for willingness to place ideology above all no matter how unlawful

Lastly there is the Nuclear option (either figurative or literal) that Bush implement well documented plans to abandon even pretense of Democracy, either as a result of real reaction to something like striking Iran, or any false flag plot that said press gin up with equally false hysteria.

While some things cannot be easily hidden, the GOP has quite a history of catching Americans flat footed with attacks so outrageous no one believed they would think of doing it till after they did so.

Without being paranoid, we still need to be prepared to not let that happen this time.

If the Gang Of Pirates think that the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat, only a fool would think it bipartisan to accommodate them by acting the part.