Of Media Orgies and Obama's Payment for Others' Sins

THE FIFTH COLUMNIST by P.M. Carpenter

 cc

Mike Allen, the Politico's chief political writer, has filed a story, of sorts, that could have begun, "Please forgive us, for we know all too well what we do."

It's something of a journalistic mea culpa, a self-examination of his own publication's flagrante delicto embarrassment. It is, that is, almost Spitzerian in its almost apology for having indulged in the latest media orgy -- yeah, that one -- at a politico's expense.

Further, it can be boiled down to four, red-faced little words: We can be bullied.

The "news" at the root of Mr. Allen's embarrassment is the non-story he variously describes as an "old, oft-written" tale of guilt by association; a bit of dead buzz that "has been written about countless times"; a piece of journalistic driftwood that "opponents of Obama have constantly pushed reporters to write about" with unthinking abandon; a reverberating "fracas" within the "Eastern media echo chamber." 

But hey, suddenly there was video, and though that video seasoned the actual meat of the story not one iota, "political reporters and editors were inundated with e-mails from red-state friends and relatives" to write about it -- again -- as though the morsel was something fresh, which is what political reporters are supposed to report and editors edit. 

"Many news outlets -- including Politico," writes Mr. Allen, "did not initially pile on with rehashes" about the unremittingly rehashed story because to do so would be ... now here's some news ... a rehash. 

But lordy lord especially the right-wing noise machine geared up with splendidly enthusiastic rehashed-ness, and in no time flat blithering idiots like Bill O'Reilly were splashing said video all over the tube.

The right, need I remind you, mostly relies on visual amusement since reading might upset its assorted philosophical states of denial. So perhaps to this woefully unread segment of our declining society -- one that happens to be in the otherwise newsworthy grips of two failing wars and a collapsing economy -- the story was, in fact, news.  

It wasn't, of course, but naturally it was, because bottomfeeding firms like O'Reilly & Hannity Unlimited were bound to say it was. And left unaccompanied, they could very well finish the happy race to the bottom in sole possession of the media prize money. 

Which is to say, one should not pick on only Fox for its magnificent obsession with the story. Because, let's face it, most newsy adult education in this country is a visual medium as well. So other 24-hour cable networks competitively "piled on" with the worst of them, and before long, even responsible print publications were forced to pile on, too. It's a market thing.

And all along, piling up on Mr. Allen's desk, as mentioned, were all those "emails from red-state friends and relatives." Also mentioned but downplayed by Allen were those conspiring mounds of screaming "gotcha" missives from other self-serving opponents of Obama -- those who once emotionally unraveled in "progressive" hysteria over the Illinois senator's objective notation of Ronald Reagan's historic trajectory.

My, my, how times, attitudes and tactical friends do change. At any rate, the external piling on came with crushing and inescapable force.

Allen's defense, in so many words: We can take only so much. We can be pushed. We can be bullied. But please forgive us, as we forgive those who hustled this intemperate crapola on us.

We shall, I trust and pray.

And besides, there are so many devils in this story it's hard to know for whom one should have the most sympathy -- the millions of Bill O'Reillys of this nation, who sadly suffer from arrested development; the millions of "other" opponents, who see their candidate plunging into the dark and desperate abyss; the unaligned and commonly inattentive millions, who just assume that news is whatever they're told is news; the press and electronic media, who are often battered by unmanageable market forces.

But back to reality -- at least for now, until yet another media orgy commences.

Please respond to the commentary by leaving comments below and sharing them with the BuzzFlash community. For personal questions or comments you can contact P.M. at
fifthcolumnistmail@gmail.com

THE FIFTH COLUMNIST by P.M. Carpenter

 

Technorati Tags:

Of Media Orgies and Obama's Payment for Others' Sins

Good article on the mark. I have been thinking a lot about the American Media lately and how their loyalty to the almighty dollar has completely changed their purpose and direction. Making money for owners and shareholders trumps any responsibility they have to report the truth, the facts, or what is relevant to American people's lives. Giant media has been for sale to the highest bidders, namely, government officials who will look the other way when big media wants to abuse their corporate responsibility. It's a match made in hell. Promoting intolerance and prejudice distracts, divides, and weakens public control to do what is right for the country. This deception opens the door for "our so-called" elected official opportunists to gut the treasury, public assets, natural resources, public welfare, our infrastructure, education system, health care system, our national integrity, safety, security of our personal and private communications, and wellbeing. American mainstream media is no better than gossip and low-brow entertainment. Most people no longer have access to the information needed to make intelligent decisions. The progress we have made over centuries has done an about face. Who knew our country would be in such a diminished capacity in just 10 to 12 years? Media companies claim that they are only giving the viewers what they want to see (More nonsense about Brittany or Paris Hilton types instead of dead bodies in Iraq and Afghanistan.) Politicians say that dirty underhanded campaigning is what we really want. After all, it works. What fun to watch the candidate for hope and change destroyed by misinformation or in-your-face exaggeration? Will no one take responsibility for doing the right thing? I am afraid if there aren't enough of us to rise to the top, our future looks grim. Cynicism does not make you look smart. Do responsible parents give their children a candy-only diet because that's what they want? Does a responsible adult provide an alcoholic with an open bar to please him/her? Don't voters deserve to be served the truth and facts in order to make wise voting decisions instead of being influenced by purchased smut, gossip and innuendo? Corporate responsibility and compassion for the less fortunate are on life support. Wake up people. If we don't help each other gain access to basic human needs, the whole masterpiece is spoiled. The wealthy will pay much more for societal problems that are ignored now than for fixing the damage done by our neglect later. Demand responsible journalism, Keep your eye on the ball and believe. Yes we can.

very nice

That was an enjoyable read. Thank-you. Also, maybe I'm wrong about the whole "because Obama's black he'll cater to black people only," but didn't I hear somewhere, and maybe this is just a left-wing lie to make him more palatable to racey Republicans and independents with brains, but someone told me his mother was white. Somehow, I just don't see Obama the same way others do.

no specifics of the scandal noted

O'Reilly as a case of arrested development is the best synopsis of him I've ever read. If it's been said before, I've never come across it. I love a concise all-encompassing description. Thanks.

mea culpa indeed

Thanks for spotting that. Erratum remedied.

Flagrante dilecto

OK, it's pedantry time. 'In flagrante delicto' means 'while the crime is flaming-hot', that is, while it is or was on-going. 'In flagrante dilecto' means, if it means anything, 'while the levy [or selection or choice] is flaming-hot'. So maybe this was a typo, but it cheered me up no end. Oh, and I know it's not much comfort, but at least we don't have Silvio Berlusconi running for President. Even McCain doesn't boast about rendezvous with showgirls, or advise people who ask him about how he will solve poverty (not that I suppose many people do) to marry a millionaire, as Berlusca does. About half of Italians will be stupid, venal, and ignorant enough to vote for him. About half of Americans will be stupid, venal and ignorant enough to vote for McCain. But at least our pols have the decency to hide their extra-marital intrigues for as long as the Feds let them.

Obma will Cater to the black people if elected

Many voters will use this theory to avoid voting for a black man.This is absurd Thinking, Legislation passed by the Congress and accepted by the President, is not based upon a voters Skin Color,it is based upon the Will of the people as a whole.for example if it is Demanded by the people, that Health Care be free of cost, that means all the people will recieve free health Care, not a particular Group. Think about It.

Even Keith Olbermann

I was - AM - so disgusted.

Kathy Gustafson Brookings, SD "Death has a tendency to encourage a depressing view of war." ~ Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld

I don't get it

The claim that the people have the power is absurd. It was thrown out. As was said before, Bill Clinton supported and signed 1996 legislation that made it possible for a handful of megacorporations with board members seated on other megacorporate boards with vested interests in war profiteering, chemical/drug/insurance and energy to buy up, consolidate and run roughshod over the content of what the US hears and sees via radio, TV, magazines and newspapers, about 92% of all MSM we access the last time I checked. These same corporate interests as a consortium own the exit polling for our elections which they have conviently adjusted in the middle of the night. I honestly don't know how we can put that genie back in the bottle. They tried to do it with AT&T making all those Baby Bells. I think about the Sorcerer's Apprentice taking an ax to the water-toting broom only to be drowned by the thousand brooms grown out of the splinters. There are many pressures on newspersons to both pursue multiple political attacks and suppress other potential scandals. The bottom line is, on the whole, that they are cogs in the machine to be rewarded, often lucratively, or punished with loss of their incomes. Perhaps this is too simple a view given the rise of Olbermann and Abrams and that Tucker Carlson has finally lost so many of his viewers that he is losing his regular gig. But that is only one network. Pat Williams

right on

I don't think your view is too simple at all. I think you hit it exactly on the head - these guys are essentially entertainers - their bread and butter is their ratings - (not just nielsen but Q) and that's what gets them their jobs - end of story. Of course the media has a bias - it's called PROFIT and they don't try to hide it. We've just gotten so used to the fact that there is no such thing as "serving the public good" that we hardly notice their self-aggrandizement or lack of civic responsibility. No, today's "news" programs are to journalism what Hustler is to erotica - a pornographic perversion.

Priority One

Priority One of Pelosi and the Dems in Congress should have been to break up the conglomerates. Granted, they might not have gotten far, but they would have at least brought the subject to the forefront and started some loud public debate about how Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big Health Care, Big Media and Big Insurance have wrecked the lives of this country's citizens and made us all much worse off.

Big Oil: controls everything, prices of all goods go up, more coming out of everyone's pockets.

Big Pharma: senior citizens forced to choose medications over rent or food, US citizens paying double, triple, quadruple what other nations' citizens pay for medications.

Big Health Care: we are all -- each and every one of us -- just one diagnosis away from total ruin. The system is rigged so that the loser is the patient. Different levels of insurance decide who lives or dies -- if you have an HMO, you do not get to receive the same treatment as someone who has a PPO.

Big Media: What we hear reflects the opinions of the media corporation bosses, not the unvarnished truth.

Big Insurance: Pay an arm and a leg to insure your house, then they drop you and you're left unprotected. Scam the system by forming corporations within states (such as Florida, high risk for hurricanes) and can then claim to be losing money, while the "parent" corporation is reaping the biggest profits in history.

Thanks, Bill Clinton.

Hillary: more of the same.

McCain has at least three of these hate mongering men!

http://www.motherjones.com/washington_dispatch/2008/03/john-mccain-rod-parsley-spiritual-guide.html for his latest horror of a spiritual supporter. McCain has sought these endorsements. Now, why has not the media demanded a rejection and all those other words of these hate filled ministers? Could it be, because the MSM is owned by Republicans? It is time that we demand that they are fair and balanced. Let's have the video's of these intolerant and hateful men of God on the air 24/7! Write those letters and e-mails or they win! Also, take a look at the difference in the negative issues which are brought up on Senator Obama compared to Senator Clinton or Senator McCain. Shameful! 464 to 125, 688 to 202. The MSM have the power to decide this for all of us. They decided that Senator Edwards was not their man, mostly because he was going after the Masters of the Universe and so they sidelined him. Did not report on him, did not publish the polling where he was leading in it. Ignored him at the debates, even though he, and not Clinton, was in second place. They are doing the same with Senator Obama, by attacking him 3 to 4 times more often. This must stop! Let's show them that we, the people, have the power! Yes We Do! WRITE!

Where's the video on Hagee and Parsley?

Since the corporate MSM seems to be into pastorial feeding frenzies these days, just where in the holy crap is a modicum of evenhandedness? I just saw an hour-long show on Hagee on PBS that exposes him as a superstitious, Zionist, armageddon-loving zealot, with some of the most far-fetched fantasies you'd ever see outside of "Romper Room"--yet the media did only one real day of coverage on him and completely ignored his armageddonist, fantacist, pro-Likud views and instead focused lightly on his anti-catholocism. And we're lucky they did that much. What am I to make of this willful deriliction of duty by our precious media? I have to go to the website "Counterpunch" to find out any truth at all in regards how the neocons in our Pentagon and far-right Likud in Israel are in complete lockstep, and how rightwing-Christian propagandist fantacists like Hagee are their willful enablers. What a perfect storm of religious vapidtry. If you saw my post yesterday you know that I believe there is a mountain of evidence supporting the fact that we have been using the US military to further corporate interests for a hundred years. But it's actually a 2-edged sword of stupidity--because our military is also being used as a proxy for the Zionist Likuds in Israel. If ever there was a perfect time to have a public discussion of our foreign policy ties with the far-right Likud Party of Israel and the "blowback" it is invoking upon this country by the rest of the world, you'd think Hagee's endorsement of McCain would be that time...wouldn't you? Rather than focus on media feeding frenzies in and of themselves, we would do better to question just WHO and HOW some people make decisions in high media places that COMPLETELY CENSOR any public debate over the proper role of our relationship with Israel. The next time you see a person make any of these points on bigtime TV (not access channels) and then gets a return appearance, let me know. I have a feeling I'll be waiting a while.

Conservatism, again, to blame

The consolidation of the media is another consequence of 30 years of "conservatism." I find it painfully ironic that Clinton and her supporters complain about "media bias" when the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (championed and signed by Mr. Clinton) was the final nail in the coffin of real TV news and helped create today's carnival. Once networks could own their own content, it all became about the bottom line and news divisions suffered because they NEVER made money. Put that on top of the loss of the 'equal time' doctrine, the death of local radio (again, blame the 1996 Act) and the rise of right wing talk (no coincidence, there!) and it's been a perfect storm. We don't live in the Information Age - we live in the Misinformation Age. Yes, "the truth is out there." But it is increasingly hard to find through the opinion and propoganda that pollutes the "news" shows.

Sad

I have said for a long time that the press, the MSM, is the most responsible for the sad state of our country. They have the most responsibility to be adults, yet they are the most childlike of all. This was quite obvious during the 24X7 coverage of Monica, or as you see how they laugh as Bush kids about not finding WMD in Iraq. Never mind that hundreds of thousands died for Bush's folly; his jokes about it are "funny".... pitiful indeed.