![]() |
|||||
|
May 5, 2003 |
|||||
Why Do U.S. Military Helicopters Keep Crashing? A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS In the beginning weeks of Operation Iraqi Freedom, as well as during the war on terrorism, military helicopter crashes and "hard landings" were a common occurrence. A number of BuzzFlash readers wrote in to comment on this, with many questioning why U.S. helicopters seemed to pose more of a threat than the enemy. Indeed, the war with Iraq was supposed to be an "ambitious test" for the Apache helicopters, which were never used in battle in Kosovo because of logistical problems and deadly training accidents. (Bear in mind that each AH-64A Apache costs at least $14 million, according to Jane’s Information Group and the U.S. Army. The newer version, the Longbow, costs about $18 million.) The news media also began to raise questions -- and tried to provide answers. "Series of crashes highlights the vulnerability of copters," read a March 23, 2003 Boston Globe headline. "For soldiers, the crashes served as reminders that helicopters - the workhorses they rely on for quick delivery into and out of hostile areas, as well as countless more mundane operations - are delicate crafts whose stability can be easily affected by changes in weather and visibility and sudden maneuvers." The Washington Post reported April 4: "After a spell of bad weather and hasty repairs, many of the high-tech Apaches attached to the Army's 11th Aviation Regiment are once again in the thick of war. But they are flying more cautious missions than the long-distance ones envisioned for the world's most advanced attack helicopters." Writing in May 2002, James Ridgeway of the Village Voice may have been one of the first columnists to question the number of aircraft-related deaths in Afghanistan: "Could the lack of adequate maps have played a role? Were the deaths from poor training or musty equipment? One Pentagon spokesperson declined to comment. Another said the number of crashes didn't seem unusual to him," wrote Ridgeway. "Helicopters hate dust, and there's plenty of it in Afghanistan," was the title of this Stars and Stripes story from Feb. 21, 2002. Dust and sandstorms were mentioned as contributing causes to helicopter malfunctions in Iraq, as well. You just have to wonder: Didn't the military commanders know this would be a problem? Has the amount of sand increased so much since the 1991 Persian Gulf War that no one thought, gee, maybe helicopters aren't reliable for the sort of desert missions the military has planned? The age of the helicopters was also frequently cited in the press: The CH-46 Sea Knight helicopter that crashed in Kuwait, killing 12 American and British soldiers, "was part of an aging U.S. Marine Corps fleet that is long overdue for retirement,"according to the Orlando Sentinel (via Stars and Stripes). "The CH-46 went out of production in 1971 and was scheduled to be phased out by 1999. But safety problems with its replacement, the V-22 Osprey, has the future of both helicopters in limbo. That leaves the marines with no choice but to keep flying their fleet of nearly 300 CH-46s into combat, where they are used primarily to transport troops and equipment." (As an aside, Stars and Stripes reported in February, 2003 that by fiscal 2009, "the [Marine] Corps hopes to buy 117 of the Osprey for a total of $9.9 billion." Yes, folks, $9.9 billion -- even though the Osprey has been blamed for dozens of deaths and there have been charges of misconduct concerning the investigation into the troubled Osprey. "I've got some real problems with this airplane," Edward "Pete" Aldridge, undersecretary of defense for acquisition, logistics and technology, told defense reporters last August. "I'm probably the most skeptical person in the Defense Department at this time on the V-22." Knowing this doesn't raise performance expectations now, does it?) Even amid all the controversy, some people aren't convinced that the military needs to take a hard look the role of helicopters: "In no uncertain terms are the rates we’re experiencing for all types of airframes out of the ordinary," Lt. Col. Benjamin Moody, the executive assistant for the Marine Corps' safety division, told Stars and Stripes April 7, referring to the number of helicopter accidents that occurred during the war with Iraq. "We’re doing fantastic," said Marine Col. David Kerrick, deputy commander of Naval Safety Center in Norfolk, Va. Fortunately, however, not everyone’s buying that line. Fred Kaplan, who’s been providing military analysis for Slate, called for reducing funding for the Longbow and the RAH-66 Comanche helicopter in this April 31 article. In a previous article, "Chop the Chopper," he wrote: "With [Secretary of Defense Donald] Rumsfeld's star rising and the generals' tarnished, he can be expected to mount a new offensive on their bureaucratic turf at the first opportunity. He might want to start by junking the Army's attack helicopter. The current version, the AH-64D Apache Longbow, is in many ways a vast improvement over earlier models, but it is still too dangerous to the pilots who fly it and not dangerous enough to the enemy it's designed to attack." A BUZZFLASH NEWS ANALYSIS * * * For more information: See the U.S. Army aviation accident statistics for the current fiscal year. Class A accidents -- those in which damage exceeds $1 million or results in a fatality -- are up 60 percent over last year. The Navy and the Marines are also having off years, according to military data. * * * HELICOPTER FATALITES: 2001- 2003 U.S. Helicopter Fatalities U.S. Helicopter Fatalities BuzzFlash has researched these incidents to the best of its ability, but may have overlooked something. If so, please let us know so we can provide the most accurate count.
Fatalities Due to Accidents 2003 Date: April 4, 2003 Date: April 2, 2003 Date: March 30, 2003 Date: March 23, 2003 Date: March 21, 2003 Date: March 11, 2003 ** Date: Feb. 25, 2003 Date: Jan. 30, 2003 2002 Date: Aug. 21, 2002 ** Date: Feb. 22, 2002 Date: Jan. 20, 2002 2001 Date: Oct. 19, 2001 Date: Oct. 11, 2001 ** * * * Fatalities Due to Enemy Fire Date: March 4, 2002 Date: March 4, 2002 POWs Captured As Result Of Enemy Fire Date: March 24, 2003 |
|||||
| DAILY BUZZ | ||||
| INTERVIEWS | ||||
| ANALYSIS | ||||
| MEDIA LINKS | ||||
|
Unless
otherwise noted, all original |
||||